Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Otolaryngology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2014 Apr;4(4):298-308. doi: 10.1002/alr.21272. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
Besides sensorineural factors, conductive impediments likely contribute to olfactory losses in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) patients, yet no conclusive evidence exists. We aimed to examine possible conductive factors using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models.
A total of 29 CRS patients were assessed via odorant detection thresholds (ODTs), rhinomanometry (nasal resistance [NR]), acoustic rhinometry (minimum-cross-sectional area [MCA]) and computed tomography (CT) staging. CFD simulations of nasal airflow and odorant absorption to olfactory region were carried out based on individual CTs. Biopsies of olfactory epithelium (OE) were collected, cryosectioned, stained, and scored for erosion.
Significant correlations to ODTs were found for 3 variables: odor absorption in the olfactory region (r = -0.60, p < 0.01), MCA (r = -0.40, p < 0.05), and CT staging (r = 0.42, p < 0.05). However, significant findings were limited to ODTs of the highly soluble l-carvone. Multiple regression analysis revealed that these variables combined, with the addition of NR, can account for 65% of the total variance in ODTs. CT staging correlated significantly with OE erosion (r = 0.77, p < 0.01) and can replace the latter in the regression with comparable outcomes. Partial correlations suggest the contributions of both conductive and sensorineural variables are more prominent if adjusted for the effects of the other. Olfactory loss and inflammatory factors have strong bilateral involvement, whereas conductive factors are independent between sides. As validation, CFD-simulated NRs significantly correlated with rhinomanometrically assessed NRs (r = 0.60, p < 0.01).
Both conductive and sensorineural mechanisms can contribute to olfactory losses in CRS. CFD modeling provides critical guidance in understanding the role of conductive impediments in olfactory dysfunction in CRS.
除了感觉神经性因素外,传导性障碍可能也是慢性鼻-鼻窦炎(CRS)患者嗅觉丧失的原因,但目前尚无确凿证据。我们旨在使用计算流体动力学(CFD)模型来检查可能的传导性因素。
对 29 例 CRS 患者进行评估,评估指标包括气味检测阈值(ODT)、鼻阻力(NR)测压、声鼻测量(最小横截面积[MCA])和计算机断层扫描(CT)分期。根据患者的个体 CT 数据,进行鼻气流和气味吸收到嗅区的 CFD 模拟。收集嗅上皮(OE)活检标本,进行冷冻切片、染色,并对其进行侵蚀评分。
发现 3 个变量与 ODT 有显著相关性:嗅觉区的气味吸收(r=-0.60,p<0.01)、MCA(r=-0.40,p<0.05)和 CT 分期(r=0.42,p<0.05)。然而,仅在高度溶解的 l-香芹酮的 ODT 中发现了显著的相关性。多元回归分析显示,这些变量与 NR 结合,可以解释 ODT 总方差的 65%。CT 分期与 OE 侵蚀显著相关(r=0.77,p<0.01),并且可以替代回归分析中的后者,产生类似的结果。偏相关分析表明,如果调整其他因素的影响,传导性和感觉神经性因素的贡献更为突出。嗅觉丧失和炎症因素有强烈的双侧受累,而传导性因素则在两侧之间是独立的。作为验证,CFD 模拟的 NR 与鼻阻力计评估的 NR 显著相关(r=0.60,p<0.01)。
传导性和感觉神经性机制都可能导致 CRS 患者的嗅觉丧失。CFD 模型为理解 CRS 中传导性障碍在嗅觉功能障碍中的作用提供了重要的指导。