• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

逆行性肾内手术治疗大于 2.5 厘米的肾结石。

Retrograde intrarenal surgery for kidney stones larger than 2.5 cm.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Curr Opin Urol. 2014 Mar;24(2):179-83. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000030.

DOI:10.1097/MOU.0000000000000030
PMID:24451091
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The management of large intrarenal stones (>2 cm) is typically percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Although the stone-free rate (SFR) of such a procedure is high (up to 95%), the complications related mainly to the renal access are sometimes a concern. Because of the evolution in technology, it is nowadays possible to treat intrarenal stones with retrograde intrarenal surgery. It remains unclear weather or not retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) may be effective also for the treatment of larger stones (>2 cm). The purpose of this review is to provide recent data on the ureteroscopic management of kidney stones larger than 2.5 cm.

RECENT FINDINGS

A systematic review of the literature for studies identified between January 2000 and September 2013 was performed. Only English language articles reporting on more than 10 cases treated with RIRS for intrarenal stones larger than 2.5 cm were considered for this review.Particular emphasis was given to studies published within the last 12 months. Of the 324 studies identified, only 10 were considered suitable for this review. There were a total of 441 patients with a mean stone size of 2.9 cm. The SFR with an average of 1.6 procedures was 89.3%. The overall complication rate was 8% with major complication rate of 1.9%.

SUMMARY

Although not supported by high evidence because of the absence of prospective randomized studies, it appears that in selected patients with large intrarenal stones, RIRS and laser lithotripsy may offer an acceptable efficacy with low morbidity.

摘要

目的综述

对于>2cm 的大肾结石,通常采用经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)治疗。尽管该手术的无石率(SFR)很高(高达 95%),但主要与肾通路相关的并发症有时令人担忧。由于技术的发展,目前可以采用逆行性肾内手术(RIRS)来治疗肾结石。对于>2cm 的肾结石,RIRS 是否有效尚不清楚。本文旨在提供最近有关输尿管镜治疗>2.5cm 肾结石的资料。

最新发现

对 2000 年 1 月至 2013 年 9 月间发表的文献进行了系统回顾。只有报告采用 RIRS 治疗>2.5cm 肾结石的病例数>10 例且为英文文献的研究才被纳入本综述。特别关注了过去 12 个月内发表的研究。在 324 篇研究中,仅有 10 篇适合本综述。共有 441 例患者,平均结石大小为 2.9cm。平均 1.6 次手术的 SFR 为 89.3%。总的并发症发生率为 8%,主要并发症发生率为 1.9%。

结论

虽然由于缺乏前瞻性随机研究,证据级别不高,但对于特定的大肾结石患者,RIRS 和激光碎石术似乎具有可接受的疗效和较低的发病率。

相似文献

1
Retrograde intrarenal surgery for kidney stones larger than 2.5 cm.逆行性肾内手术治疗大于 2.5 厘米的肾结石。
Curr Opin Urol. 2014 Mar;24(2):179-83. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000030.
2
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal stones in adults.经皮肾镜碎石术与逆行性肾内手术治疗成人肾结石。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 13;11(11):CD013445. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013445.pub2.
3
Management of urinary stones by experts in stone disease (ESD 2025).结石病专家对尿路结石的管理(2025年结石病专家共识)
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025 Jun 30;97(2):14085. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2025.14085.
4
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)与经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)或逆行肾内手术(RIRS)治疗肾结石的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 24(11):CD007044. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007044.pub3.
5
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.体外冲击波碎石术 (ESWL) 与经皮肾镜碎石取石术 (PCNL) 或逆行肾内手术 (RIRS) 治疗肾结石的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 1;8(8):CD007044. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007044.pub4.
6
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole renal stones.系统评价和冲击波碎石术、逆行性肾内手术和经皮肾镜取石术治疗下极肾结石的临床疗效的荟萃分析。
Eur Urol. 2015 Apr;67(4):612-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.054. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
7
Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of urinary stones in children.儿童尿路结石治疗的医学及外科干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 2;6(6):CD010784. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010784.pub2.
8
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮肾镜碎石术与逆行性肾内手术:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol. 2015 Jan;67(1):125-137. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.07.003. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
9
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)与经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)或逆行肾内手术(RIRS)治疗肾结石的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7(4):CD007044. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007044.pub2.
10
Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for stones >2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.软性输尿管镜和激光碎石术治疗 >2cm 的结石:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Endourol. 2012 Oct;26(10):1257-63. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0217. Epub 2012 Jul 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical advantages of suctioning flexible ureteroscopy with intelligent pressure control on treating large upper urinary tract calculi.智能压力控制下的抽吸式软性输尿管镜治疗上尿路大结石的临床优势
Front Surg. 2025 Jul 2;12:1554964. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1554964. eCollection 2025.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Tip-Flexible Suctioning Ureteral Access in Renal Stone Treatment.可弯曲头部输尿管镜吸引在肾结石治疗中的疗效与安全性
Med Sci Monit. 2025 May 30;31:e947055. doi: 10.12659/MSM.947055.
3
Comparison of flexible ureteroscopic suction techniques: efficacy and safety of flexible and navigable access sheath (FANS) vs. direct in-scope suction (DISS) in the management of 2-3 cm lower pole renal stones.
软性输尿管镜吸引技术的比较:软性可导航鞘(FANS)与直视下镜内吸引(DISS)在处理2-3厘米下极肾结石中的疗效与安全性
Urolithiasis. 2025 Apr 19;53(1):75. doi: 10.1007/s00240-025-01748-7.
4
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of kidney stones in overweight or obese patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.微创经皮肾镜取石术与逆行性肾内手术治疗超重或肥胖患者肾结石的疗效和安全性比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Urol. 2024 Nov 6;24(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01588-4.
5
Rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy with a pressure-controlling ureteral access sheath for complex steinstrasse.采用压力控制型输尿管导管的硬性输尿管镜碎石术治疗复杂的石街。
BMC Urol. 2024 May 28;24(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01501-z.
6
Does prior PCNL affect RIRS? A retrospective analysis of a single center data.PCNL 史是否会影响 RIRS?单中心数据的回顾性分析。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2024 Oct;56(10):3187-3191. doi: 10.1007/s11255-024-04071-z. Epub 2024 May 7.
7
Comparison of traditional and suctioning ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of renal calculi.传统输尿管取石鞘和负压吸引输尿管取石鞘在逆行肾内手术治疗肾结石中的比较。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Mar 2;409(1):81. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03275-2.
8
Optimizing Outcomes in Flexible Ureteroscopy: A Narrative Review of Suction Techniques.优化软性输尿管镜检查的结果:吸引技术的叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 11;12(8):2815. doi: 10.3390/jcm12082815.
9
Complete Stone Clearance after Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery among Patients with Urolithiasis in a Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.在三级护理中心,肾结石患者接受逆行肾内手术后结石完全清除:一项描述性的横断面研究。
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2022 Dec 1;60(256):1033-1036. doi: 10.31729/jnma.7785.
10
Technique, Feasibility, Utility, Limitations, and Future Perspectives of a New Technique of Applying Direct In-Scope Suction to Improve Outcomes of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Stones.应用直视镜内吸引新技术改善逆行性肾内手术治疗结石效果的技术、可行性、效用、局限性及未来展望
J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 27;11(19):5710. doi: 10.3390/jcm11195710.