Kevern Peter, Hill Lisa
1Senior Lecturer,Faculty of Health Sciences,Staffordshire University,Stafford,UK.
2Senior Commissioning Manager,Sandwell and West Birmingham CCG,Stafford,UK.
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2015 Jan;16(1):87-99. doi: 10.1017/S1463423613000492. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
To analyse quantitative changes in patient well-being concurrent with chaplaincy interventions in a retrospective study of a group of Primary Care centres in Sandwell and West Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Anecdotal evidence suggests that support from trained Primary Care Chaplains may be particularly useful for those with subclinical mental health issues; it can reduce the tendency to 'medicalise unhappiness' and is a positive response to patients with medically unexplained symptoms. However, to date there has been no published research attempting to quantify their contribution.
Data were gathered from a group of Primary Care Centres, which make use of a shared Chaplaincy service. Demographic data and pre-post scores on the Warwick and Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS) were collected for patients who had attended consultations with a Chaplain. These were subjected to tests of statistical significance to evaluate the possible contribution of chaplaincy to patient well-being along with possible confounding variables.
a substantial improvement in WEMWBS scores (mean=9 points, BCa 95% CI [7.23, 10.79], P=0.001) post-intervention. The improvement in scores was highest for those with initially lower levels of well-being. There is therefore evidence that chaplaincy interventions correlate with an improvement of holistic well-being as measured by a WEMWBS score. A prospective study on a larger scale would provide more detailed information on the interaction of possible variables. Further study is also required to evaluate the implications of this result for patient outcomes and GP resources. The efficacy of Primary Care Chaplaincy is under-researched and difficult to measure. This paper represents the first attempt to quantify a measurable improvement in the well-being of patients who are referred to the service.
在对英国桑德韦尔和西伯明翰的一组初级保健中心进行的回顾性研究中,分析与牧师干预同时发生的患者幸福感的定量变化。
轶事证据表明,受过培训的初级保健牧师的支持对那些有亚临床心理健康问题的人可能特别有用;它可以减少将“不快乐医学化”的倾向,并且是对有医学上无法解释症状的患者的一种积极回应。然而,迄今为止,尚未有发表的研究试图量化他们的贡献。
从一组利用共享牧师服务的初级保健中心收集数据。收集了与牧师进行过咨询的患者的人口统计学数据以及沃里克和爱丁堡心理健康量表(WEMWBS)的前后得分。对这些数据进行统计显著性检验,以评估牧师服务对患者幸福感的可能贡献以及可能的混杂变量。
干预后WEMWBS得分有显著提高(平均值 = 9分,BCa 95%置信区间[7.23, 10.79],P = 0.001)。幸福感初始水平较低的患者得分提高幅度最大。因此,有证据表明,牧师干预与通过WEMWBS得分衡量的整体幸福感的改善相关。大规模的前瞻性研究将提供关于可能变量相互作用的更详细信息。还需要进一步研究来评估这一结果对患者结局和全科医生资源的影响。初级保健牧师服务的效果研究不足且难以衡量。本文首次尝试量化转介到该服务的患者幸福感的可测量改善。