Sainz de Baranda Pilar, Rodríguez-Iniesta María, Ayala Francisco, Santonja Fernando, Cejudo Antonio
*Faculty of Sport and Physical Education of Toledo, University of Castilla La Mancha, Toledo, Spain; †Municipal Sports Council of San Javier, Murcia, Spain; ‡Sports Research Center, Miguel Hernandez University of Elche Alicante, Spain; §ISEN University Formation, Center Affiliated to the University of Murcia, Spain; ¶Faculty of Medicine, Department of Traumatology, University of Murcia, V. de la Arrixaca University Hospital, Murcia, Spain; and ‖INACUA Sports Center, Murcia, Spain.
Clin J Sport Med. 2014 Jul;24(4):320-5. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000079.
To examine the criterion-related validity of the horizontal hip joint angle (H-HJA) test and vertical hip joint angle (V-HJA) test for estimating hamstring flexibility measured through the passive straight-leg raise (PSLR) test using contemporary statistical measures.
Validity study.
Controlled laboratory environment.
One hundred thirty-eight professional trampoline gymnasts (61 women and 77 men).
Hamstring flexibility.
Each participant performed 2 trials of H-HJA, V-HJA, and PSLR tests in a randomized order. The criterion-related validity of H-HJA and V-HJA tests was measured through the estimation equation, typical error of the estimate (TEEST), validity correlation (β), and their respective confidence limits.
The findings from this study suggest that although H-HJA and V-HJA tests showed moderate to high validity scores for estimating hamstring flexibility (standardized TEEST = 0.63; β = 0.80), the TEEST statistic reported for both tests was not narrow enough for clinical purposes (H-HJA = 10.3 degrees; V-HJA = 9.5 degrees). Subsequently, the predicted likely thresholds for the true values that were generated were too wide (H-HJA = predicted value ± 13.2 degrees; V-HJA = predicted value ± 12.2 degrees).
The results suggest that although the HJA test showed moderate to high validity scores for estimating hamstring flexibility, the prediction intervals between the HJA and PSLR tests are not strong enough to suggest that clinicians and sport medicine practitioners should use the HJA and PSLR tests interchangeably as gold standard measurement tools to evaluate and detect short hamstring muscle flexibility.
采用现代统计方法,检验水平髋关节角度(H-HJA)测试和垂直髋关节角度(V-HJA)测试在通过被动直腿抬高(PSLR)测试评估腘绳肌柔韧性方面的标准关联效度。
效度研究。
受控实验室环境。
138名专业蹦床体操运动员(61名女性和77名男性)。
腘绳肌柔韧性。
每位参与者以随机顺序进行2次H-HJA、V-HJA和PSLR测试。通过估计方程、估计的典型误差(TEEST)、效度相关性(β)及其各自的置信限来测量H-HJA和V-HJA测试的标准关联效度。
本研究结果表明,尽管H-HJA和V-HJA测试在估计腘绳肌柔韧性方面显示出中等至高的效度分数(标准化TEEST = 0.63;β = 0.80),但这两项测试报告的TEEST统计量对于临床目的来说不够精确(H-HJA = 10.3度;V-HJA = 9.5度)。随后,生成的真实值的预测可能阈值过宽(H-HJA = 预测值±13.2度;V-HJA = 预测值±12.2度)。
结果表明,尽管HJA测试在估计腘绳肌柔韧性方面显示出中等至高的效度分数,但HJA和PSLR测试之间的预测区间不够精确,不足以表明临床医生和运动医学从业者应将HJA和PSLR测试作为评估和检测腘绳肌柔韧性的金标准测量工具相互替代使用。