Suppr超能文献

不同化学方法处理的去细胞神经支架的形态学和生物相容性比较。

Comparison of morphology and biocompatibility of acellular nerve scaffolds processed by different chemical methods.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 127, Dongming Road, Zhengzhou, 450008, Henan, People's Republic of China,

出版信息

J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2014 May;25(5):1283-91. doi: 10.1007/s10856-014-5150-3. Epub 2014 Jan 23.

Abstract

To investigate the morphological differences among acellular rat nerve scaffolds processed by different chemical methods and compare the biocompatibility between rat nerve grafts processed by different chemical methods and rat adipose-derived stem cells in vitro. Acellular rat sciatic nerve scaffolds processed by two different chemical methods (the Sondell method and the optimized method) and normal rat sciatic nerves were used as control. The structure and components of nerve scaffold were observed under microscopy, the degrees of decellularization and demyelination of nerve scaffold and integrity of nerve fiber tubes were assessed. The rat adipose-derived stem cells growth and adherence on scaffold were studied by scanning electron microscopy, the activity and adhesive ratio of rat adipose-derived stem cells in the nerve scaffold were compared. The basal lamina tubes and the extracellular matrix in the epineurium and perineurium in the nerve graft of optimized method were better preserved than the nerve graft of the Sondell method. After co-cultured with scaffolds, the difference of cell activity between three groups (two cell-scaffold combinations and control group) at the same observation time were not statistically significant (P > 0.05),the adhesive ratio of rat adipose-derived stem cells in the scaffold of the optimized method was better than that of the Sondell method. The scaffold of the optimized method is more effective than the scaffold of the Sondell method for peripheral nerve tissue engineering.

摘要

为了研究不同化学方法处理的去细胞大鼠神经支架的形态学差异,并比较不同化学方法处理的大鼠神经移植物与体外大鼠脂肪源性干细胞的生物相容性。将两种不同化学方法(Sondell 法和优化法)处理的去细胞大鼠坐骨神经支架和正常大鼠坐骨神经作为对照。在显微镜下观察神经支架的结构和成分,评估神经支架的去细胞化和去髓鞘程度以及神经纤维管的完整性。通过扫描电子显微镜研究大鼠脂肪源性干细胞在支架上的生长和黏附情况,比较大鼠脂肪源性干细胞在神经支架中的活性和黏附率。与 Sondell 法神经移植物相比,优化法神经移植物的外膜基底层管和细胞外基质保存更好。与支架共培养后,同一观察时间点三组(两种细胞-支架组合和对照组)细胞活性差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),优化法支架中大鼠脂肪源性干细胞的黏附率优于 Sondell 法。与 Sondell 法支架相比,优化法支架更适用于周围神经组织工程。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验