Wang Bi-Huei, Lin Chien-Lin, Li Te-Mao, Lin Shih-Din, Lin Jaung-Geng, Chou Li-Wei
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan ; School of Chinese Medicine, College of Chinese Medicine, Taichung, Taiwan.
Clin Interv Aging. 2014;9:147-56. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S53814. Epub 2014 Jan 10.
This study investigated the clinical efficacy of electroacupuncture (EA) in inhibiting upper-extremity spasticity in chronic stroke patients, and also in mapping a unique preliminary acupoint-selection protocol.
Fifteen patients were divided into two groups: patients in the control group (n=6) received minimal acupuncture (MA), and those in the experimental group (n=9) received EA. Four acupoints, which include Neiguan (PC6), Shaohai (HT3), Zeqian (Ex-UE, A32), and Shounizhu (EX-UE), were treated near the motor points of the muscles for elbow flexion, forearm pronation, and finger flexion. Both groups were treated for twelve sessions, 20 minutes per session, for 6 weeks (two sessions per week). The outcome measures in this study included angle of muscle reaction (R1), passive range of motion (R2), and dynamic component (R2-R1).
In the experimental group, the R2-R1 of the elbow joint was significantly decreased at 1 (P=0.0079), 3 (P=0.0013), and 6 weeks (P=0.0149) after treatment compared with pretreatment levels (P<0.05). The between-group difference in the R2-R1 of the elbow joint after the 6-week treatment was statistically significant.
Combining the 6-week EA and standard rehabilitation treatment reduced the spasticity of the elbow for chronic stroke survivors. However, no significant effect was observed in the spasticity of the wrist joints. The choice of acupoints and the frequency of EA have to be taken into account to achieve a positive treatment effect. The correlation between acupoints and motor points provides a model of acupoint selection to improve spasticity.
本研究探讨了电针(EA)对慢性中风患者上肢痉挛的临床疗效,并绘制了一种独特的初步穴位选择方案。
15例患者分为两组:对照组(n = 6)接受微量针刺(MA),实验组(n = 9)接受电针治疗。选取内关(PC6)、少海(HT3)、泽前(Ex-UE,A32)和手逆注(EX-UE)四个穴位,在屈肘、前臂旋前和手指屈曲肌肉的运动点附近进行治疗。两组均接受12次治疗,每次20分钟,共6周(每周两次)。本研究的疗效指标包括肌肉反应角度(R1)、被动活动范围(R2)和动态成分(R2 - R1)。
实验组治疗后1周(P = 0.0079)、3周(P = 0.0013)和6周(P = 0.0149)时,肘关节的R2 - R1较治疗前水平显著降低(P < 0.05)。6周治疗后,两组肘关节R2 - R1的组间差异具有统计学意义。
6周的电针治疗与标准康复治疗相结合可减轻慢性中风幸存者肘关节的痉挛。然而,未观察到对腕关节痉挛有显著影响。为达到积极的治疗效果,必须考虑穴位的选择和电针频率。穴位与运动点之间的相关性为改善痉挛提供了一种穴位选择模型。