Vanhove Maarten P M, Tessens Bart, Schoelinck Charlotte, Jondelius Ulf, Littlewood D Tim J, Artois Tom, Huyse Tine
Laboratory of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Genomics, Department of Biology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium ; Present address: Department of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Research Group Zoology: Biodiversity & Toxicology, Centre for Environmental Sciences, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Zookeys. 2013 Dec 30(365):355-79. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.365.5776.
Some taxonomic groups are less amenable to mitochondrial DNA barcoding than others. Due to the paucity of molecular information of understudied groups and the huge molecular diversity within flatworms, primer design has been hampered. Indeed, all attempts to develop universal flatworm-specific COI markers have failed so far. We demonstrate how high molecular variability and contamination problems limit the possibilities for barcoding using standard COI-based protocols in flatworms. As a consequence, molecular identification methods often rely on other widely applicable markers. In the case of Monogenea, a very diverse group of platyhelminth parasites, and Rhabdocoela, representing one-fourth of all free-living flatworm taxa, this has led to a relatively high availability of nuclear ITS and 18S/28S rDNA sequences on GenBank. In a comparison of the effectiveness in species assignment we conclude that mitochondrial and nuclear ribosomal markers perform equally well. In case intraspecific information is needed, rDNA sequences can guide the selection of the appropriate (i.e. taxon-specific) COI primers if available.
一些分类群比其他分类群更难进行线粒体DNA条形码分析。由于对研究不足的类群分子信息匮乏,以及扁形虫内部巨大的分子多样性,引物设计受到了阻碍。事实上,到目前为止,所有开发通用的扁形虫特异性COI标记的尝试都失败了。我们展示了高分子变异性和污染问题如何限制了在扁形虫中使用基于标准COI的方案进行条形码分析的可能性。因此,分子鉴定方法通常依赖于其他广泛适用的标记。对于单殖吸虫(一类非常多样的扁形虫寄生虫)和代表所有自由生活扁形虫分类单元四分之一的杆吻目来说,这导致了GenBank上核ITS和18S/28S rDNA序列的相对高可用性。在物种鉴定有效性的比较中,我们得出结论,线粒体和核糖体标记的表现同样出色。如果需要种内信息,rDNA序列可以在有可用序列时指导合适的(即分类群特异性的)COI引物的选择。