Suppr超能文献

4.5毫米动力加压接骨板偏心定位导向板的形态学评估

Morphological evaluation of eccentric sets guide-plates of dcp-l 4.5 mm.

作者信息

Borges José Humberto de Souza, da Silva Filho Antonio Lisboa, Pereira Neto Francisco, Daher Walter Rodrigo, de Mesquita Alessandro Queiroz, Freitas Anderson

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic and Traumatology of Hospital Regional do Gama do Distrito Federal (HRG -DF) - Brasília, DF, Brazil.

出版信息

Acta Ortop Bras. 2012;20(1):13-6. doi: 10.1590/S1413-78522012000100002.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To carry out isolated and comparative evaluations of the measurements of the set eccentric guide plates used in 4.5mm surgical implants, and to determine the effect of these measurements on compression strength.

METHODS

Four eccentric guides, four large dynamic compression plates (L-DCP) from four local manufacturers, and a Vonder(®) 200 mm caliper brand were used. Five standard parameter measurements were created for the set eccentric guide-plate, which were identified as A to E. Four sets were made, using materials of the same factory, and identified as groups I to IV. The analyses were performed by measuring all the parameters from a ventral view of the plate, with the eccentric guide placed in the plate hole.

RESULTS

Groups I and II showed the same values for all the parameters. All the groups showed the same measurements for E = 8.15 e B = 3.60. Group III: A = 8.10mm, C = 3.25mm, D = 1.25mm. Group IV: A = 7.00mm, C = 3.10mm, D = 0.30mm. Maximum compression force was (F Max.): Group I 80.58 N, Group. II: F Max. 81.63 N, Group. III: F Max. 36.32N, Group. IV: F Max. 37.52N.

CONCLUSION

The measurements evaluated show a lack of standardization in the manufacture of orthopedic instruments and its effects on the values for compression strength.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, analytical study.

摘要

目的

对4.5mm外科植入物中使用的成套偏心导向板的测量值进行单独和比较评估,并确定这些测量值对压缩强度的影响。

方法

使用四个偏心导向器、来自四个当地制造商的四个大型动力加压钢板(L-DCP)以及一个Vonder(®)200mm卡尺品牌。为成套偏心导向板创建了五个标准参数测量值,分别标识为A至E。使用同一工厂的材料制作了四组,分别标识为I至IV组。通过将偏心导向器置于钢板孔中,从钢板腹侧视图测量所有参数来进行分析。

结果

I组和II组的所有参数值相同。所有组的E = 8.15和B = 3.60测量值相同。III组:A = 8.10mm,C = 3.25mm,D = 1.25mm。IV组:A = 7.00mm,C = 3.10mm,D = 0.30mm。最大压缩力为(F Max.):I组80.58N,II组:F Max. 81.63N,III组:F Max. 36.32N,IV组:F Max. 37.52N。

结论

评估的测量结果表明,骨科器械制造缺乏标准化及其对压缩强度值的影响。

证据水平

III级,分析性研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9be/3718412/d33e0803fbb5/aob-20-013-g01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验