Suppr超能文献

重新思考久坐行为范式。

Reconsidering the sedentary behaviour paradigm.

机构信息

Health and Use of Time Group, School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Division of Population Science, Pennington Biomedical Research Centre, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Jan 15;9(1):e86403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086403. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

AIMS

Recent literature has posed sedentary behaviour as an independent entity to physical inactivity. This study investigated whether associations between sedentary behaviour and cardio-metabolic biomarkers remain when analyses are adjusted for total physical activity.

METHODS

Cross-sectional analyses were undertaken on 4,618 adults from the 2003/04 and 2005/06 U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Minutes of sedentary behaviour and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), and total physical activity (total daily accelerometer counts minus counts accrued during sedentary minutes) were determined from accelerometry. Associations between sedentary behaviour and cardio-metabolic biomarkers were examined using linear regression.

RESULTS

Results showed that sedentary behaviour was detrimentally associated with 8/11 cardio-metabolic biomarkers when adjusted for MVPA. However, when adjusted for total physical activity, the associations effectively disappeared, except for C-reactive protein, which showed a very small, favourable association (β = -0.06) and triglycerides, which showed a very small, detrimental association (β = 0.04). Standardised betas suggested that total physical activity was consistently, favourably associated with cardio-metabolic biomarkers (9/11 biomarkers, standardized β = 0.08-0.30) while sedentary behaviour was detrimentally associated with just 1 biomarker (standardized β = 0.12).

CONCLUSION

There is virtually no association between sedentary behaviour and cardio-metabolic biomarkers once analyses are adjusted for total physical activity. This suggests that sedentary behaviour may not have health effects independent of physical activity.

摘要

目的

最近的文献提出久坐行为是身体活动不足的一个独立因素。本研究旨在调查当分析调整为总身体活动时,久坐行为与心血管代谢生物标志物之间的关联是否仍然存在。

方法

对来自美国 2003/04 年和 2005/06 年国家健康和营养调查的 4618 名成年人进行了横断面分析。使用加速度计确定久坐行为和中等到剧烈体力活动(MVPA)的分钟数以及总体力活动(总每日加速度计计数减去久坐分钟数所获得的计数)。使用线性回归检验久坐行为与心血管代谢生物标志物之间的关联。

结果

结果表明,当调整为 MVPA 时,久坐行为与 11 个心血管代谢生物标志物中的 8 个呈不利关联。然而,当调整为总身体活动时,除 C 反应蛋白(β =-0.06)和甘油三酯(β = 0.04)外,关联几乎消失,而这两种标志物分别显示出非常小的有利关联和非常小的不利关联。标准化贝塔系数表明,总身体活动与心血管代谢生物标志物始终呈有利关联(11 个生物标志物中的 9 个,标准化β=0.08-0.30),而久坐行为仅与 1 个生物标志物呈不利关联(标准化β=0.12)。

结论

当分析调整为总身体活动时,久坐行为与心血管代谢生物标志物之间几乎没有关联。这表明久坐行为可能没有独立于身体活动的健康影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73a8/3893290/943c81e95303/pone.0086403.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验