Honda Takanori, Chen Sanmei, Kishimoto Hiro, Narazaki Kenji, Kumagai Shuzo
Department of Behavior and Health Sciences, Graduate School of Human-Environment Studies, Kyushu University, 6-1 Kasuga kouen, Kasuga City, Fukuoka Prefecture 816-8580, Japan.
BMC Public Health. 2014 Dec 19;14:1307. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1307.
Sedentary behavior has been reported to be associated with metabolic and vascular health independent of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). In order to select appropriate options to measure sedentary behavior in practice and research settings, it is worthwhile to characterize the extent to which objective and subjective measures of sedentary behavior quantify adverse health risks in the same population. This cross-sectional analysis compared accelerometer-derived and self-reported sedentary time to identify their association with cardio-metabolic risk factors.
Cross-sectional analysis was conducted using data from 661 Japanese workers (145 women) aged 20-64 years. Participants wore a tri-axial accelerometer device for 10 consecutive days and completed the Japan Atherosclerosis Longitudinal Study Physical Activity Questionnaire. Data on body mass index, waist circumference, resting blood pressure, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, total:HDL cholesterol ratio, blood glucose, and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) were obtained from annual health examinations.
Both accelerometer-derived and self-reported sedentary time were deleteriously associated with triglycerides, HDL-cholesterol, total:HDL ratio, and HbA1c after adjustment for potential confounders including MVPA. There were no significant differences in regression coefficients between the two measures. Thus, the magnitude of the associations of both measures with cardio-metabolic risk factors was similar, despite poor agreement between them. Occupational sedentary time was correlated with both measures of total sedentary time, and more consistently associated with cardio-metabolic risk factors than sedentary leisure time.
Both accelerometer and self-report measurements are similarly associated with cardio-metabolic risk factors in a Japanese working adult population. Subjective and objective measures of sedentary behaviors appear to capture different aspects of behaviors. Further efforts to establish data processing methods integrating objective and subjective measures are needed to more effectively assess sedentary time's relationship to health outcomes.
据报道,久坐行为与代谢和血管健康相关,且独立于中度至剧烈身体活动(MVPA)。为了在实践和研究环境中选择合适的方法来测量久坐行为,有必要确定久坐行为的客观和主观测量方法在同一人群中量化不良健康风险的程度。本横断面分析比较了加速度计测量的久坐时间和自我报告的久坐时间,以确定它们与心血管代谢风险因素的关联。
使用来自661名年龄在20 - 64岁的日本工人(145名女性)的数据进行横断面分析。参与者连续10天佩戴三轴加速度计设备,并完成日本动脉粥样硬化纵向研究身体活动问卷。从年度健康检查中获取体重指数、腰围、静息血压、甘油三酯、高密度脂蛋白(HDL)和低密度脂蛋白(LDL)胆固醇、总HDL胆固醇比值、血糖和糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)的数据。
在对包括MVPA在内的潜在混杂因素进行调整后,加速度计测量的久坐时间和自我报告的久坐时间均与甘油三酯、HDL胆固醇、总HDL比值和HbA1c呈有害关联。两种测量方法的回归系数无显著差异。因此,尽管两者之间一致性较差,但两种测量方法与心血管代谢风险因素的关联程度相似。职业久坐时间与总久坐时间的两种测量方法均相关,并且比久坐休闲时间更一致地与心血管代谢风险因素相关。
在日本成年工作人群中,加速度计测量和自我报告测量与心血管代谢风险因素的关联相似。久坐行为的主观和客观测量方法似乎捕捉到了行为的不同方面。需要进一步努力建立整合客观和主观测量方法的数据处理方法,以更有效地评估久坐时间与健康结果的关系。