Suppr超能文献

单剂量与多剂量两性霉素B脂质体治疗东非内脏利什曼病的安全性和疗效:一项随机试验。

Safety and efficacy of single dose versus multiple doses of AmBisome for treatment of visceral leishmaniasis in eastern Africa: a randomised trial.

作者信息

Khalil Eltahir A G, Weldegebreal Teklu, Younis Brima M, Omollo Raymond, Musa Ahmed M, Hailu Workagegnehu, Abuzaid Abuzaid A, Dorlo Thomas P C, Hurissa Zewdu, Yifru Sisay, Haleke William, Smith Peter G, Ellis Sally, Balasegaram Manica, EL-Hassan Ahmed M, Schoone Gerard J, Wasunna Monique, Kimutai Robert, Edwards Tansy, Hailu Asrat

机构信息

Institute of Endemic Diseases, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan.

Arba Minch Hospital, Regional Health Bureau of SNNP State, Arba Minch, Ethiopia.

出版信息

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014 Jan 16;8(1):e2613. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002613. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anti-leishmanial drug regimens that include a single dose AmBisome could be suitable for eastern African patients with symptomatic visceral leishmaniasis (VL) but the appropriate single dose is unknown.

METHODOLOGY

A multi-centre, open-label, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial with an adaptive design, was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of a single dose and multiple doses of AmBisome for the treatment of VL in eastern Africa. The primary efficacy endpoint was definitive cure (DC) at 6 months. Symptomatic patients with parasitologically-confirmed, non-severe VL, received a single dose of AmBisome 7.5 mg/kg body weight or multiple doses, 7 times 3 mg/kg on days 1-5, 14, and 21. If interim analyses, evaluated 30 days after the start of treatment following 40 or 80 patients, showed the single dose gave significantly poorer parasite clearance than multiple doses at the 5% significance level, the single dose was increased by 2·5 mg/kg. In a sub-set of patients, parasite clearance was measured by quantitative reverse transcriptase (qRT) PCR.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

The trial was terminated after the third interim analysis because of low efficacy of both regimens. Based on the intention-to-treat population, DC was 85% (95%CI 73-93%), 40% (95%CI 19-64%), and 58% (95%CI 41-73%) in patients treated with multiple doses (n = 63), and single doses of 7·5 (n = 21) or 10 mg/kg (n = 40), respectively. qRT-PCR suggested superior parasite clearance with multiple doses as early as day 3. Safety data accorded with the drug label.

CONCLUSIONS

The tested AmBisome regimens would not be suitable for VL treatment across eastern Africa. An optimal single dose regimen was not identified.

TRIALS REGISTRATION

www.clinicaltrials.govNCT00832208.

摘要

背景

包含单剂量安必素的抗利什曼原虫药物方案可能适用于东非有症状的内脏利什曼病(VL)患者,但合适的单剂量尚不清楚。

方法

开展了一项采用适应性设计的多中心、开放标签、非劣效性随机对照试验,以比较单剂量和多剂量安必素治疗东非VL的疗效和安全性。主要疗效终点是6个月时的确诊治愈(DC)。经寄生虫学确诊为非严重VL的有症状患者,接受单剂量7.5mg/kg体重的安必素或多剂量,即第1 - 5天、第14天和第21天每天3mg/kg共7次给药。如果在40或80例患者开始治疗30天后进行的中期分析显示,单剂量在5%显著性水平下的寄生虫清除率显著低于多剂量,则单剂量增加2.5mg/kg。在一部分患者中,通过定量逆转录酶(qRT)PCR测量寄生虫清除率。

主要发现

由于两种方案疗效均较低,该试验在第三次中期分析后终止。在意向性治疗人群中,接受多剂量(n = 63)、单剂量7.5mg/kg(n = 21)或10mg/kg(n = 40)治疗的患者,确诊治愈率分别为85%(95%CI 73 - 93%)、40%(95%CI 19 - 64%)和58%(95%CI 41 - 73%)。qRT-PCR表明多剂量方案早在第3天寄生虫清除效果就更好。安全性数据与药品标签一致。

结论

所测试的安必素方案不适用于整个东非地区的VL治疗。未确定最佳单剂量方案。

试验注册

www.clinicaltrials.govNCT00832208

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1f4/3894173/4f47a57218c1/pntd.0002613.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验