Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative (DNDi), New Delhi, India.
Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), New Delhi, India.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Oct 22;12(10):e0006830. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006830. eCollection 2018 Oct.
In 2010, WHO recommended the use of new short-course treatment regimens in kala-azar elimination efforts for the Indian subcontinent. Although phase 3 studies have shown excellent results, there remains a lack of evidence on a wider treatment population and the safety and effectiveness of these regimens under field conditions.
This was an open label, prospective, non-randomized, non-comparative, multi-centric trial conducted within public health facilities in two highly endemic districts and a specialist referral centre in Bihar, India. Three treatment regimens were tested: single dose AmBisome (SDA), concomitant miltefosine and paromomycin (Milt+PM), and concomitant AmBisome and miltefosine (AmB+Milt). Patients with complicated disease or significant co-morbidities were treated in the SDA arm. Sample sizes were set at a minimum of 300 per arm, taking into account inter-site variation and an estimated failure risk of 5% with 5% precision. Outcomes of drug effectiveness and safety were measured at 6 months. The trial was prospectively registered with the Clinical Trials Registry India: CTRI/2012/08/002891.
Out of 1,761 patients recruited, 50.6% (n = 891) received SDA, 20.3% (n = 358) AmB+Milt and 29.1% (n = 512) Milt+PM. In the ITT analysis, the final cure rates were SDA 91.4% (95% CI 89.3-93.1), AmB+Milt 88.8% (95% CI 85.1-91.9) and Milt+PM 96.9% (95% CI 95.0-98.2). In the complete case analysis, cure rates were SDA 95.5% (95% CI 93.9-96.8), AmB+Milt 95.5% (95% CI 92.7-97.5) and Milt+PM 99.6% (95% CI 98.6-99.9). All three regimens were safe, with 5 severe adverse events in the SDA arm, two of which were considered to be drug related.
All regimens showed acceptable outcomes and safety profiles in a range of patients under field conditions. Phase IV field-based studies, although extremely rare for neglected tropical diseases, are good practice and an important step in validating the results of more restrictive hospital-based studies before widespread implementation, and in this case contributed to national level policy change in India.
Clinical trial is registered at Clinical trial registry of India (CTRI/2012/08/002891, Registered on 16/08/2012, Trial Registered Prospectively).
2010 年,世界卫生组织(WHO)建议在印度次大陆消除黑热病的努力中使用新的短期疗程治疗方案。尽管 3 期研究显示出了优异的结果,但在更广泛的治疗人群中,以及在现场条件下这些方案的安全性和有效性方面,仍缺乏证据。
这是一项在印度比哈尔邦两个高度流行地区的公共卫生机构和一个专科转诊中心内进行的开放性、前瞻性、非随机、非对照、多中心试验。测试了三种治疗方案:单剂量两性霉素 B 脂质体(SDA)、同时使用米替福新和硫酸巴龙霉素(Milt+PM)以及同时使用两性霉素 B 脂质体和米替福新(AmB+Milt)。患有复杂疾病或严重合并症的患者在 SDA 组中接受治疗。每个治疗组的样本量设定为至少 300 例,考虑到站点间的差异以及 5%的估计失败风险和 5%的精度。在 6 个月时测量药物有效性和安全性的结果。该试验在印度临床试验注册处进行了前瞻性注册(CTRI/2012/08/002891)。
在招募的 1761 名患者中,50.6%(n=891)接受了 SDA、20.3%(n=358)接受了 AmB+Milt 和 29.1%(n=512)接受了 Milt+PM。在意向治疗分析中,最终治愈率分别为 SDA 91.4%(95%CI 89.3-93.1)、AmB+Milt 88.8%(95%CI 85.1-91.9)和 Milt+PM 96.9%(95%CI 95.0-98.2)。在完整病例分析中,治愈率分别为 SDA 95.5%(95%CI 93.9-96.8)、AmB+Milt 95.5%(95%CI 92.7-97.5)和 Milt+PM 99.6%(95%CI 98.6-99.9)。所有三种方案均安全,SDA 组有 5 例严重不良事件,其中 2 例被认为与药物有关。
所有方案在现场条件下的一系列患者中均显示出可接受的结果和安全性特征。尽管对被忽视的热带病来说,基于现场的 IV 期临床研究极其罕见,但这是良好的实践,并且是在广泛实施之前验证更具限制性的医院研究结果的重要步骤,在这种情况下,有助于印度国家政策的改变。
临床试验在印度临床试验注册处注册(CTRI/2012/08/002891,于 2012 年 8 月 16 日注册,前瞻性注册)。