Suppr超能文献

印度内脏利什曼病短程多药治疗与标准治疗的比较:一项开放标签、非劣效性、随机对照试验。

Comparison of short-course multidrug treatment with standard therapy for visceral leishmaniasis in India: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Kala-Azar Medical Research Center, Department of Medicine, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.

出版信息

Lancet. 2011 Feb 5;377(9764):477-86. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62050-8. Epub 2011 Jan 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Improved treatment approaches are needed for visceral leishmaniasis. We assessed the efficacy and safety of three potential short-course combination treatments compared with the standard monotherapy in India.

METHODS

Standard treatment (1 mg/kg amphotericin B infusion on alternate days for 30 days, total dose 15 mg/kg) was compared with three drug combinations (single injection of 5 mg/kg liposomal amphotericin B and 7-day 50 mg oral miltefosine or single 10-day 11 mg/kg intramuscular paromomycin; or 10 days each of miltefosine and paromomycin) in an open-label, parallel-group, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial in two hospital sites in Bihar, India. Patients aged 5-60 years with parasitologically confirmed visceral leishmaniasis were randomly assigned one of the four treatments by the trial statistician by use of a computer-generated list. Clinical assessments were done at the end of treatment (15 days on combination treatment; 31 days for standard treatment) and after 45 days and 6 months. The primary endpoint was definitive cure (defined as no sign or symptom of visceral leishmaniasis and parasitologically cured to the last follow-up). Analyses were done both by intention to treat and per protocol. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00696969.

FINDINGS

Between June, 2008, and July, 2009, 634 patients were assigned amphotericin B (n=157), liposomal amphotericin B with miltefosine (n=160) or paromomycin (n=158), or miltefosine and paromomycin (n=159). 618 patients were in the per-protocol population. There were two relapses in each group. The numbers with definitive cure at 6 months for the intention-to-treat population were 146 (cure rate 93·0%; CI 87·5-96·3) for amphotericin B, 156 (97·5%; 93·3-99·2) for liposomal amphotericin B and miltefosine, 154 (97·5%; 93·24-99·2) for liposomal amphotericin B and paromomycin, and 157 (98·7%; 95·1-99·8) for miltefosine and paromomycin. All combinations were non-inferior to the standard treatment, in both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. Patients in the combination groups had fewer adverse events than did those assigned standard treatment.

INTERPRETATION

Combination treatments for visceral leishmaniasis are efficacious and safe, and decrease the duration of therapy, thereby encouraging adherence and reducing emergence of drug-resistant parasites.

FUNDING

Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative and the Indian Council of Medical Research.

摘要

背景

需要改进内脏利什曼病的治疗方法。我们评估了三种潜在的短程联合治疗方案与印度标准单药治疗相比的疗效和安全性。

方法

标准治疗(1 毫克/千克两性霉素 B 隔日输注 30 天,总剂量 15 毫克/千克)与三种药物联合治疗(单次注射 5 毫克/千克脂质体两性霉素 B 和 7 天 50 毫克口服米替福新或单次 10 天 11 毫克/千克肌内硫酸巴龙霉素;或米替福新和硫酸巴龙霉素各 10 天)进行比较,这是在印度比哈尔邦的两个医院进行的一项开放标签、平行组、非劣效性、随机对照试验。年龄在 5-60 岁之间、经寄生虫学证实患有内脏利什曼病的患者由试验统计学家通过使用计算机生成的列表随机分配到四种治疗方法之一。在治疗结束时(联合治疗 15 天;标准治疗 31 天)和治疗结束后 45 天和 6 个月进行临床评估。主要终点是明确治愈(定义为无内脏利什曼病的任何迹象或症状且寄生虫学治愈至最后一次随访)。按意向治疗和方案进行分析。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT00696969。

结果

2008 年 6 月至 2009 年 7 月,共有 634 名患者被分配接受两性霉素 B(n=157)、脂质体两性霉素 B 联合米替福新(n=160)或硫酸巴龙霉素(n=158)或米替福新和硫酸巴龙霉素(n=159)治疗。618 名患者在方案人群中。每个组都有两例复发。意向治疗人群在 6 个月时明确治愈的人数分别为:两性霉素 B 组 146 例(治愈率 93.0%;CI 87.5-96.3)、脂质体两性霉素 B 和米替福新组 156 例(97.5%;93.3-99.2)、脂质体两性霉素 B 和硫酸巴龙霉素组 154 例(97.5%;93.24-99.2)和米替福新和硫酸巴龙霉素组 157 例(98.7%;95.1-99.8)。在意向治疗人群和方案人群中,所有联合治疗均不劣于标准治疗。联合治疗组患者的不良反应少于标准治疗组。

解释

内脏利什曼病的联合治疗方案有效且安全,可缩短治疗时间,从而鼓励患者坚持治疗,并减少耐药寄生虫的出现。

资金来源

被忽视的疾病药物研发倡议和印度医学研究理事会。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验