• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

固定修复中三种临时冠材料弯曲强度和弹性模量的体外比较

In vitro comparison of flexural strength and elastic modulus of three provisional crown materials used in fixed prosthodontics.

作者信息

Poonacha Vachan, Poonacha Seema, Salagundi Basavaraj, Rupesh P L, Raghavan Rohit

机构信息

MDS, Senior Lecturer. Dept. of Prosthodontics, Coorg Institute of Dental Sciences, Virajpet, S-Coorg, Karnataka India.

MDS, Senior Lecturer. Dept. of Conservative Dentistry And Endodontics, Coorg Institute of Dental Sciences, Virajpet, S-Coorg, Karnataka India.

出版信息

J Clin Exp Dent. 2013 Dec 1;5(5):e212-7. doi: 10.4317/jced.51136.

DOI:10.4317/jced.51136
PMID:24455084
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3892269/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate and compare the flexural strength and the elastic moduli of three provisional crown materials (methyl methacrylate based autopolymerized resin, bis acryl composite based autopolymerized resin and urethane dimethacrylate based light polymerized resin) after storing in artificial saliva and testing at intervals of 24 hours and 7 days.

STUDY DESIGN

A metal master mould with four slots of dimensions 25x2x2 mm was fabricated to obtain samples of standard dimensions. A total of 135 specimens were thus obtained with 45 each of three provisional materials. Further 15 samples of each group were tested after storing for one hour at room temperature and again at intervals of 24 hours and 7 days after storing in artificial saliva. Three point flexural tests were carried out in the universal testing machine to calculate the flexural strength and the elastic modulus. The changes were calculated and data was analyzed with Fisher's test and ANOVA.

RESULTS

The flexural strength of the methyl methacrylate resin reduced significantly while bis-acrylic composite resin showed a significant increase in its flexural strength after storing in artificial saliva for 24 hours and the values of both remained constant thereafter. Contrary to these findings, light polymerized resin showed a significant decrease in flexural strength after storing in artificial saliva for 24 hours and then significantly increased in flexural strength after 7 days. However the changes in the values for elastic modulus of respective materials were statistically insignificant.

CONCLUSION

Methacrylate based autopolymerizing resin showed the highest flexural strength and elastic moduli after fabrication and after storing in artificial saliva and for 24 hours and 7 days. Bis-acrylic composite resin showed the least flexural strength and elastic moduli. Key words:Provisional restorations, interim restorations, Methyl Methacrylate, composite restoration, flexural strength, elastic moduli.

摘要

目的

评估并比较三种临时冠材料(甲基丙烯酸甲酯基自凝树脂、双丙烯酸复合树脂基自凝树脂和聚氨酯二甲基丙烯酸酯基光固化树脂)在人工唾液中储存后,以及在24小时和7天的间隔时间进行测试后的弯曲强度和弹性模量。

研究设计

制作一个带有四个尺寸为25×2×2毫米狭槽的金属母模,以获得标准尺寸的样本。由此共获得135个标本,三种临时材料各45个。每组再取15个样本,在室温下储存一小时后进行测试,在人工唾液中储存后,再分别在24小时和7天的间隔时间进行测试。在万能试验机上进行三点弯曲试验,以计算弯曲强度和弹性模量。计算变化量,并使用Fisher检验和方差分析对数据进行分析。

结果

甲基丙烯酸甲酯树脂的弯曲强度显著降低,而双丙烯酸复合树脂在人工唾液中储存24小时后弯曲强度显著增加,此后两者的值保持不变。与这些结果相反,光固化树脂在人工唾液中储存24小时后弯曲强度显著降低,然后在7天后弯曲强度显著增加。然而,各材料弹性模量值的变化在统计学上不显著。

结论

甲基丙烯酸酯基自凝树脂在制作后以及在人工唾液中储存24小时和7天后,显示出最高的弯曲强度和弹性模量。双丙烯酸复合树脂显示出最低的弯曲强度和弹性模量。关键词:临时修复体、临时修复、甲基丙烯酸甲酯、复合修复、弯曲强度、弹性模量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9bf/3892269/6cac2dffa6f9/jced-5-e212-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9bf/3892269/5bc592d92afd/jced-5-e212-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9bf/3892269/6a2dc422a900/jced-5-e212-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9bf/3892269/6cac2dffa6f9/jced-5-e212-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9bf/3892269/5bc592d92afd/jced-5-e212-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9bf/3892269/6a2dc422a900/jced-5-e212-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9bf/3892269/6cac2dffa6f9/jced-5-e212-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
In vitro comparison of flexural strength and elastic modulus of three provisional crown materials used in fixed prosthodontics.固定修复中三种临时冠材料弯曲强度和弹性模量的体外比较
J Clin Exp Dent. 2013 Dec 1;5(5):e212-7. doi: 10.4317/jced.51136.
2
Evaluation of Flexural Strength of Thermocycled Interim Resin Materials Used in Prosthetic Rehabilitation- An In-vitro Study.用于修复性修复的热循环临时树脂材料弯曲强度的评估——一项体外研究。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Sep;10(9):ZC91-ZC95. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/20020.8566. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
3
Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Strength of Provisional Crown and Bridge Materials-An Invitro Study.临时冠桥材料抗弯强度的比较评估——一项体外研究
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Aug;10(8):ZC72-7. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/19582.8291. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
4
Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Strength of Four Different Types of Provisional Restoration Materials: An In Vitro Pilot Study.四种不同类型临时修复材料抗弯强度的比较评估:一项体外初步研究
Children (Basel). 2023 Feb 15;10(2):380. doi: 10.3390/children10020380.
5
Mechanical properties of urethane and bis-acryl interim resin materials.聚氨脂和双丙烯酸盐临时树脂材料的机械性能。
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Jul;110(1):21-8. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60334-0.
6
Color stability and flexural strength of poly (methyl methacrylate) and bis-acrylic composite based provisional crown and bridge auto-polymerizing resins exposed to beverages and food dye: an in vitro study.暴露于饮料和食用色素中的聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯和双丙烯酸复合树脂基临时冠桥自凝树脂的颜色稳定性和弯曲强度:一项体外研究
Indian J Dent Res. 2013 Mar-Apr;24(2):172-7. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.116672.
7
Strength and stiffness of interim materials and interim fixed dental prostheses when tested at different loading rates.在不同加载速率下测试时临时材料和临时固定义齿的强度与刚度。
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Jan;127(1):161-167. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.10.008. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
8
A comparative evaluation of vertical marginal fit of provisional crowns fabricated by computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing technique and direct (intraoral technique) and flexural strength of the materials: An study.计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造技术与直接(口内技术)制作的临时冠垂直边缘适合性及材料抗弯强度的比较评估:一项研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2018 Oct-Dec;18(4):314-320. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_306_17.
9
Evaluation of the Flexural Strength of Interim Restorative Materials in Fixed Prosthodontics.固定修复术中临时修复材料的弯曲强度评估
J Dent (Shiraz). 2016 Sep;17(3):201-6.
10
Mechanical Properties and Simulated Wear of Provisional Resin Materials.临时树脂材料的力学性能与模拟磨损
Oper Dent. 2015 Nov-Dec;40(6):603-13. doi: 10.2341/14-132-L.1. Epub 2014 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Compressive and Flexural Strength Among Three Types of Glass Ionomer Cements: An In Vitro Study.三种玻璃离子水门汀抗压强度与抗折强度的比较:一项体外研究
Cureus. 2025 Jul 2;17(7):e87171. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87171. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Strength of PMMA Reinforced with Graphene (G-CAM) and Monolithic Zirconia - An Study.石墨烯增强聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(G-CAM)与整体式氧化锆弯曲强度的比较评估——一项研究
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025 May;17(Suppl 1):S238-S241. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1715_24. Epub 2025 Apr 25.
3
The influence of internally architected voids in the creation of high-strength, low-weight 3D-printed cobalt-chromium prototypes.

本文引用的文献

1
Fixed prosthodontics provisional materials: making the right selection.固定修复临时材料:做出正确选择。
Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2013 Jan;34(1):22-4, 26; quiz 28, 30.
2
In vitro comparative evaluation of the effect of two different fiber reinforcements on the fracture toughness of provisional restorative resins.两种不同纤维增强材料对临时修复树脂断裂韧性影响的体外比较评估
Indian J Dent Res. 2012 Mar-Apr;23(2):140-4. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.100415.
3
Provisional materials: key components of interim fixed restorations.临时材料:临时固定修复体的关键组成部分。
内部构造孔隙对高强度、低重量3D打印钴铬合金原型制作的影响。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2024 Mar 26;21:21. eCollection 2024.
4
Influence of Popular Beverages on the Fracture Resistance of Implant-Supported Bis-Acrylic Resin Provisional Crowns: An In Vitro Study.流行饮料对种植体支持的双丙烯酸树脂临时冠抗折性能的影响:一项体外研究。
Polymers (Basel). 2023 Aug 15;15(16):3411. doi: 10.3390/polym15163411.
5
The Influence of the Thickness of the Materials for the Provisionalization in Minimally Invasive Restorations.材料厚度对微创修复临时修复的影响。
Materials (Basel). 2022 Oct 17;15(20):7238. doi: 10.3390/ma15207238.
6
Effect of simulated brushing on surface roughness and wear of bis-acryl-based materials submitted to different polishing protocols.模拟刷牙对采用不同抛光方案的双丙烯酸基材料表面粗糙度和磨损的影响。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2022 Feb 1;14(2):e168-e176. doi: 10.4317/jced.58920. eCollection 2022 Feb.
7
Surface Properties of Polymer Resins Fabricated with Subtractive and Additive Manufacturing Techniques.采用减材制造和增材制造技术制备的聚合物树脂的表面性能
Polymers (Basel). 2021 Nov 24;13(23):4077. doi: 10.3390/polym13234077.
8
Retention of Provisional Intraradicular Retainers Using Fiberglass Pins.使用玻璃纤维桩保留临时根管内固位体
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2020 Sep 28;10(5):666-673. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_298_20. eCollection 2020 Sep-Oct.
9
Comparison of color stability and fracture resistance of two temporary fiber-reinforced fixed partial denture materials.两种临时纤维增强固定局部义齿材料的颜色稳定性和抗折性比较
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2019 May-Jun;16(3):185-192.
10
Coloration of provisional restoration materials: a comparison of the effects of mouth rinses and green tea.临时修复材料的着色:漱口水与绿茶效果的比较
Eur Oral Res. 2018 Jan;52(1):20-26. doi: 10.26650/eor.2018.35588. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2012 Jan;33(1):59-60, 62.
4
Effect of food-simulating liquids on the mechanical properties of provisional restorative materials.食物模拟液对临时修复材料力学性能的影响。
Dent Mater. 2006 Dec;22(12):1130-4. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.09.009. Epub 2006 Jan 18.
5
Monotonic flexure and fatigue strength of composites for provisional and definitive restorations.用于临时和最终修复体的复合材料的单调挠曲和疲劳强度。
J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Jun;89(6):579-88. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(03)00174-4.
6
Crowns and other extra-coronal restorations: provisional restorations.
Br Dent J. 2002 Jun 15;192(11):619-22, 625-30. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4801443.
7
Flexural strength of provisional crown and fixed partial denture resins.临时冠和固定局部义齿树脂的抗弯强度。
J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Feb;87(2):225-8. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.121406.
8
Comparative in vitro evaluation of two provisional restorative materials.两种临时修复材料的体外比较评估
J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Feb;85(2):129-32. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001.112797.
9
In vitro mechanical property comparison of four resins used for fabrication of provisional fixed restorations.
J Prosthet Dent. 1998 Aug;80(2):158-62. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70104-0.
10
Flexural strength of provisional restorative materials.
J Prosthet Dent. 1993 Jul;70(1):94-6. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(93)90038-p.