Physiotherapy Service School of Medicine, Sao Paulo State University, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Int Braz J Urol. 2013 Nov-Dec;39(6):847-52. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2013.06.11.
The aim of this study was to assess pelvic floor muscle (PFM) strength in different body positions in nulliparous healthy women and its correlation with sexual activity.
Fifty healthy nulliparous women with mean age of 23 years were prospectively studied. Subjective evaluation of PFM was assessed by transvaginal digital palpation (TDP) of anterior and posterior areas regarding the vaginal introitus. A perineometer with inflatable vaginal probe was used to assess the PFM strength in four different positions: supine with extended lower limbs (P1); bent-knee supine (P2); sitting (P3); standing (P4).
Physical activity, 3 times per week, was reported by 58% of volunteers. Sexual activity was observed in 80% of women and 82% of them presented orgasm. The average body mass index (BMI) was 21.76 kg/m2, considered as normal according World Health Organization (WHO). We observed that 68% of volunteers were conscious about the PFM contraction. TDP showed concordance of 76% when anterior and posterior areas were compared (p = 0.00014). There was not correlation between PFM strength and orgasm in subjective evaluation. The PFM strength was significantly higher in standing position when compared with the other positions (p < 0.000). No statistical difference was observed between orgasm and PFM strength when objective evaluations were performed.
There was concordance between anterior and posterior areas in 76% of cases when subjective PFM strength was assessed. In objective evaluation, higher PFM strength was observed when volunteers were standing. No statistical correlation was observed between PFM strength and orgasm in nulliparous healthy women.
本研究旨在评估初产妇健康女性在不同体位下的盆底肌(PFMS)力量及其与性生活的相关性。
前瞻性研究了 50 名平均年龄为 23 岁的健康初产妇。通过阴道入口处阴道前、后区域的经阴道数字触诊(TDP)评估 PFMS 的主观评估。使用带有可充气阴道探头的会阴计评估 4 种不同体位下的 PFMS 力量:仰卧位下肢伸展(P1);屈膝仰卧位(P2);坐位(P3);站立位(P4)。
58%的志愿者报告每周进行 3 次体育活动。80%的女性有性生活,其中 82%的女性有性高潮。平均体重指数(BMI)为 21.76kg/m2,根据世界卫生组织(WHO)标准,被认为是正常的。我们观察到 68%的志愿者能自觉收缩 PFMS。TDP 显示前、后区域比较的一致性为 76%(p=0.00014)。主观评估中,PFMS 力量与性高潮之间无相关性。与其他体位相比,站立位时 PFMS 力量明显更高(p<0.000)。当进行客观评估时,性高潮与 PFMS 力量之间未观察到统计学差异。
在主观评估 PFMS 力量时,前、后区域的一致性为 76%。在客观评估中,志愿者站立时 PFMS 力量更高。在健康的初产妇中,PFMS 力量与性高潮之间未观察到统计学相关性。