• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

设计不均衡随机对照试验(DU-RANDOM)的方法学调查:一项方案

Methodological survey of designed uneven randomization trials (DU-RANDOM): a protocol.

作者信息

Wu Darong, Akl Elie A, Guyatt Gordon H, Devereaux Philip J, Brignardello-Petersen Romina, Prediger Barbara, Patel Krupesh, Patel Namrata, Lu Taoying, Zhang Yuan, Falavigna Maicon, Santesso Nancy, Mustafa Reem A, Zhou Qi, Briel Matthias, Schünemann Holger J

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Trials. 2014 Jan 23;15:33. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-33.

DOI:10.1186/1745-6215-15-33
PMID:24456965
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3902027/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although even randomization (that is, approximately 1:1 randomization ratio in study arms) provides the greatest statistical power, designed uneven randomization (DUR), (for example, 1:2 or 1:3) is used to increase participation rates. Until now, no convincing data exists addressing the impact of DUR on participation rates in trials. The objective of this study is to evaluate the epidemiology and to explore factors associated with DUR.

METHODS

We will search for reports of RCTs published within two years in 25 general medical journals with the highest impact factor according to the Journal Citation Report (JCR)-2010. Teams of two reviewers will determine eligibility and extract relevant information from eligible RCTs in duplicate and using standardized forms. We will report the prevalence of DUR trials, the reported reasons for using DUR, and perform a linear regression analysis to estimate the association between the randomization ratio and the associated factors, including participation rate, type of informed consent, clinical area, and so on.

DISCUSSION

A clearer understanding of RCTs with DUR and its association with factors in trials, for example, participation rate, can optimize trial design and may have important implications for both researchers and users of the medical literature.

摘要

背景

尽管随机化(即研究组中随机化比例约为1:1)能提供最大的统计效能,但设计不均衡随机化(DUR,例如1:2或1:3)被用于提高参与率。到目前为止,尚无令人信服的数据说明DUR对试验参与率的影响。本研究的目的是评估其流行病学情况,并探索与DUR相关的因素。

方法

我们将在25种根据《期刊引证报告》(JCR)-2010影响因子最高的综合医学期刊中检索两年内发表的随机对照试验(RCT)报告。由两名评审员组成的团队将确定入选标准,并使用标准化表格从符合条件的RCT中重复提取相关信息。我们将报告DUR试验的患病率、使用DUR的报告原因,并进行线性回归分析以估计随机化比例与相关因素之间的关联,这些因素包括参与率、知情同意类型、临床领域等。

讨论

更清楚地了解采用DUR的RCT及其与试验中各因素(如参与率)的关联,可优化试验设计,可能对医学文献的研究者和使用者都具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e01c/3902027/74f3a02300a1/1745-6215-15-33-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e01c/3902027/74f3a02300a1/1745-6215-15-33-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e01c/3902027/74f3a02300a1/1745-6215-15-33-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Methodological survey of designed uneven randomization trials (DU-RANDOM): a protocol.设计不均衡随机对照试验(DU-RANDOM)的方法学调查:一项方案
Trials. 2014 Jan 23;15:33. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-33.
2
No improvement in the reporting of clinical trial subgroup effects in high-impact general medical journals.高影响力的综合医学期刊在临床试验亚组效应报告方面没有改进。
Trials. 2016 Jul 16;17(1):320. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1447-5.
3
Cluster over individual randomization: are study design choices appropriately justified? Review of a random sample of trials.群组随机优于个体随机:研究设计选择是否得到了适当的证明?对随机试验样本的回顾。
Clin Trials. 2020 Jun;17(3):253-263. doi: 10.1177/1740774519896799. Epub 2020 May 5.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Randomized controlled trials in non-pharmacological rehabilitation research: a scoping review of the reporting of sample size calculation, randomization procedure, and statistical analyses.非药物康复研究中的随机对照试验:样本量计算、随机程序和统计分析报告的范围综述。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2020 Dec;56(6):790-798. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.20.06451-5. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
6
Evaluation of interventions for informed consent for randomised controlled trials (ELICIT): protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey.随机对照试验知情同意干预措施评估(ELICIT):文献系统评价及使用德尔菲调查法确定核心结局集的方案
Trials. 2015 Oct 27;16:484. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1011-8.
7
Randomized trials published in higher vs. lower impact journals differ in design, conduct, and analysis.发表在高影响力与低影响力期刊上的随机试验在设计、实施和分析方面存在差异。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Mar;66(3):286-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.10.005.
8
Proposals to Conduct Randomized Controlled Trials Without Informed Consent: a Narrative Review.关于在未获得知情同意情况下开展随机对照试验的提议:一项叙述性综述
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Dec;31(12):1511-1518. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3780-5. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
9
Assessing quality of reports on randomized clinical trials in nursing journals.评估护理期刊中随机临床试验报告的质量。
Can J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2009;19(2):25-39.
10
Methodological reporting of randomized clinical trials in respiratory research in 2010.2010 年呼吸研究中随机临床试验的方法学报告。
Respir Care. 2013 Sep;58(9):1546-51. doi: 10.4187/respcare.01877. Epub 2013 Jan 9.

引用本文的文献

1
A New Objective Diagnostic Tool for Attention-Deficit Hyper-Activity Disorder (ADHD): Development of the Distractor-Embedded Auditory Continuous Performance Test.一种用于注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的新型客观诊断工具:嵌入干扰项的听觉持续性操作测试的开发。
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 27;13(21):6438. doi: 10.3390/jcm13216438.
2
Impact of missing participant data for dichotomous outcomes on pooled effect estimates in systematic reviews: a protocol for a methodological study.系统评价中二分结局缺失参与者数据对合并效应估计值的影响:一项方法学研究方案
Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 26;3:137. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-137.

本文引用的文献

1
Potential impact on estimated treatment effects of information lost to follow-up in randomised controlled trials (LOST-IT): systematic review.随机对照试验中失访信息对估计治疗效果的潜在影响(LOST-IT):系统评价。
BMJ. 2012 May 18;344:e2809. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e2809.
2
Specific instructions for estimating unclearly reported blinding status in randomized trials were reliable and valid.针对估计随机试验中模糊报告的盲法状态的具体说明是可靠和有效的。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Mar;65(3):262-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.04.015. Epub 2011 Dec 24.
3
Neighborhoods, obesity, and diabetes--a randomized social experiment.
社区、肥胖和糖尿病:一项随机社会实验。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Oct 20;365(16):1509-19. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1103216.
4
Body-weight-supported treadmill rehabilitation after stroke.脑卒中后体重量身支持跑台康复。
N Engl J Med. 2011 May 26;364(21):2026-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1010790.
5
Racial differences in two self-management hypertension interventions.两种自我管理高血压干预措施中的种族差异。
Am J Med. 2011 May;124(5):468.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.11.024.
6
Telephone-based self-management of osteoarthritis: A randomized trial.基于电话的骨关节炎自我管理:一项随机试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Nov 2;153(9):570-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-9-201011020-00006.
7
n-3 fatty acids and cardiovascular events after myocardial infarction.n-3 脂肪酸与心肌梗死后的心血管事件。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Nov 18;363(21):2015-26. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1003603. Epub 2010 Aug 28.
8
Efficacy of standardised manual therapy and home exercise programme for chronic rotator cuff disease: randomised placebo controlled trial.标准化手法治疗和家庭运动方案治疗慢性肩袖疾病的疗效:随机安慰剂对照试验。
BMJ. 2010 Jun 8;340:c2756. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c2756.
9
CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.CONSORT 2010 声明:平行组随机试验报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c332. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c332.
10
No improvement in cardiovascular risk factors in overweight and obese subjects after supplementation with vitamin D3 for 1 year.超重和肥胖患者补充维生素 D3 1 年后,心血管风险因素无改善。
J Intern Med. 2010 May;267(5):462-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2009.02181.x. Epub 2009 Oct 19.