• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

暴发性艰难梭菌结肠炎:风险评分系统的前瞻性研究。

Fulminant Clostridium difficile colitis: prospective development of a risk scoring system.

机构信息

From the Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery and Critical Care (G.M.V.D.W., C.C., M.S., D.D.Y., D.R.K., M.A.D.M., P.J.F., G.C.V.), Department of Surgery, and Division of Biostatistics (Y.C.), Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Trauma Surgery (G.M.V.D.W., I.B.S.), Leiden University Medical Center and Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Feb;76(2):424-30. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000105.

DOI:10.1097/TA.0000000000000105
PMID:24458048
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Of the patients with a Clostridium difficile infection, 2% to 8% will progress to fulminant C. difficile colitis (fCDC), which carries high morbidity and mortality. No system exists to rapidly identify patients at risk for developing fCDC and possibly in need of surgical intervention. Our aim was to design a simple and accurate risk scoring system (RSS) for daily clinical practice.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled all patients diagnosed with a C. difficile infection and compared patients with and without fCDC. An expert panel, combined with data derived from previous studies, identified four risk factors, and a multivariable logistic regression model was performed to determine their effect in predicting fCDC. The RSS was created based on the predictive power of each factor, and calibration, discrimination, and test characteristics were subsequently determined. In addition, the RSS was compared with a previously proposed severity scoring system.

RESULTS

A total of 746 patients diagnosed with C. difficile infection were enrolled between November 2010 and October 2012. Based on the log (odds ratio) of each risk factor, age greater than 70 years was assigned 2 points, white blood cell count equal to or greater than 20,000/μL or equal to or less than 2,000/μL was assigned 1 point, cardiorespiratory failure was assigned 7 points, and diffuse abdominal tenderness on physical examination was assigned 6 points. With the use of this system, the discriminatory value of the RSS (c statistic) was 0.98 (95% confidence interval, 0.96-1).The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test showed a p value of 0.78, and the Brier score was 0.019. A value of 6 points was determined to be the threshold for reliably dividing low-risk ( <6) from high-risk (≥ 6) patients.

CONCLUSION

The RSS is a valid and reliable tool to identify at the bedside patients who are at risk for developing fCDC. External validation is needed before widespread implementation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic study, level II.

摘要

背景

在艰难梭菌感染患者中,有 2%至 8%会发展为暴发性艰难梭菌结肠炎(fulminant C. difficile colitis,fCDC),其发病率和死亡率都很高。目前尚无系统能够快速识别出有发展为 fCDC 风险的患者,从而可能需要进行手术干预。我们的目的是设计一种简单而准确的风险评分系统(risk scoring system,RSS),以便于在日常临床实践中使用。

方法

我们前瞻性地纳入所有诊断为艰难梭菌感染的患者,并比较了发生和未发生 fCDC 的患者。一个专家小组结合来自先前研究的数据,确定了四个风险因素,并进行了多变量逻辑回归模型分析,以确定这些因素对预测 fCDC 的影响。根据每个因素的预测能力创建 RSS,并随后确定其校准、区分度和检测特征。此外,还将 RSS 与先前提出的严重程度评分系统进行了比较。

结果

2010 年 11 月至 2012 年 10 月期间,共纳入了 746 例诊断为艰难梭菌感染的患者。根据每个风险因素的对数(优势比),年龄大于 70 岁赋值 2 分,白细胞计数等于或大于 20,000/μL 或等于或小于 2,000/μL 赋值 1 分,心肺功能衰竭赋值 7 分,体检时弥漫性腹部压痛赋值 6 分。使用该系统,RSS 的区分度(c 统计量)为 0.98(95%置信区间,0.96-1)。Hosmer-Lemeshow 拟合优度检验 p 值为 0.78,Brier 评分 0.019。确定 6 分作为区分低危(<6)和高危(≥6)患者的可靠阈值。

结论

RSS 是一种有效的床边工具,可用于识别有发生 fCDC 风险的患者。在广泛应用之前,需要进行外部验证。

证据水平

预后研究,Ⅱ级。

相似文献

1
Fulminant Clostridium difficile colitis: prospective development of a risk scoring system.暴发性艰难梭菌结肠炎:风险评分系统的前瞻性研究。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Feb;76(2):424-30. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000105.
2
Risk factors for the development of fulminant Clostridium difficile colitis.暴发性艰难梭菌结肠炎发生的危险因素。
Surgery. 2008 May;143(5):623-9. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.12.008. Epub 2008 Mar 24.
3
Clostridium difficile in cardiac surgery: risk factors and impact on postoperative outcome.心脏手术中的艰难梭菌:危险因素及其对术后结局的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Apr;83(4):1396-402. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.10.067.
4
Fulminant Clostridium difficile colitis: patterns of care and predictors of mortality.暴发性艰难梭菌结肠炎:护理模式及死亡率预测因素
Arch Surg. 2009 May;144(5):433-9; discussion 439-40. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.51.
5
A clinical risk index for Clostridium difficile infection in hospitalised patients receiving broad-spectrum antibiotics.住院接受广谱抗生素治疗患者艰难梭菌感染的临床风险指数
J Hosp Infect. 2008 Oct;70(2):142-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2008.06.026. Epub 2008 Aug 23.
6
Prospective derivation and validation of a clinical prediction rule for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection.复发性艰难梭菌感染临床预测规则的前瞻性推导与验证
Gastroenterology. 2009 Apr;136(4):1206-14. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.12.038. Epub 2008 Dec 13.
7
Predictors of mortality after colectomy for fulminant Clostridium difficile colitis.暴发性艰难梭菌结肠炎结肠切除术后死亡率的预测因素。
Arch Surg. 2008 Feb;143(2):150-4; discussion 155. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2007.46.
8
Clostridium difficile-associated disease and mortality among the elderly critically ill.老年危重症患者中的艰难梭菌相关疾病及死亡率
Crit Care Med. 2009 Sep;37(9):2583-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181ab8388.
9
[Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile diarrhea: in search of a more efficient clinical focus].[艰难梭菌腹泻的诊断:探寻更有效的临床重点]
Rev Med Chil. 2001 Jun;129(6):620-5.
10
Development and validation of a clinical risk calculator for mortality after colectomy for fulminant Clostridium difficile colitis.开发并验证了一种用于预测暴发性艰难梭菌结肠炎结肠切除术后死亡率的临床风险计算器。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Oct;87(4):856-864. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002412.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of Clinical Risk Models for Clostridioides difficileAttributable Outcomes.临床风险模型对艰难梭菌感染相关结局的验证。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022 Jul 19;66(7):e0067622. doi: 10.1128/aac.00676-22. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
2
Determining the optimal surgical timing of fulminant Clostridium difficile colitis by using four objective factors and computed tomography findings: A case report.利用四个客观因素及计算机断层扫描结果确定暴发性艰难梭菌结肠炎的最佳手术时机:一例病例报告
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2021 Mar;80:105633. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2021.02.019. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
3
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation: Redefining Surgical Management of Refractory Infection.
粪便微生物群移植:重新定义难治性感染的外科治疗
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2020 Mar;33(2):92-97. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1701233. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
4
Role of Surgery in Infection.手术在感染中的作用。
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2020 Mar;33(2):87-91. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1701232. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
5
External validation of clinical prediction rules for complications and mortality following Clostridioides difficile infection.临床预测规则对艰难梭菌感染后并发症和死亡率的外部验证。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 17;14(12):e0226672. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226672. eCollection 2019.
6
Diverting loop ileostomy with colonic lavage as an alternative to colectomy for fulminant Clostridioides difficile: a systematic review and meta-analysis.采用结肠灌洗的转流回肠造口术替代结肠切除术治疗暴发性艰难梭菌感染:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Jan;35(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03447-3. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
7
Treatment of Severe and Fulminnant Clostridioides difficile Infection.重度和暴发性艰难梭菌感染的治疗
Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2019 Dec;17(4):524-533. doi: 10.1007/s11938-019-00262-1.
8
An Unusual Presentation of Pseudomembranous Colitis.假膜性结肠炎的一种不寻常表现。
Cureus. 2019 Apr 30;11(4):e4570. doi: 10.7759/cureus.4570.
9
2019 update of the WSES guidelines for management of () infection in surgical patients.2019 年 WSES 外科患者()感染管理指南更新。
World J Emerg Surg. 2019 Feb 28;14:8. doi: 10.1186/s13017-019-0228-3. eCollection 2019.
10
2017 Infectious Diseases Society of America Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Infectious Diarrhea.2017 年美国传染病学会临床实践指南:感染性腹泻的诊断与管理。
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Nov 29;65(12):e45-e80. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix669.