Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Toyohashi Municipal Hospital, Toyohashi, Japan.
J Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Jan;25(1):43-50. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2014.25.1.43. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
This study was conducted to examine the effects of front-line chemotherapy on overall survival (OS) and postrecurrence survival (PRS) of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, when stratifying the histologic type.
Five hundred and seventy-four patients with recurrent ovarian cancer with sufficient clinical information, including front-line chemotherapy, were analyzed. The pathologic slides were evaluated by central pathologic review. The patients were divided into two groups: group A (n=261), who underwent taxane plus platinum, and group B (n=313), who underwent conventional platinum-based chemotherapy without taxanes.
The median age was 54 years (range, 14 to 89 years). Group A had significantly better median OS (45.0 months vs. 30.3 months, p<0.001) and PRS (23.0 months vs. 13.0 months, p<0.001) compared to group B. The OS and PRS were similar between the groups in patients with clear cell or mucinous histology. In contrast, among patients with non-clear cell, non-mucinous histologies, the OS and PRS of group A were significantly better than those of group B (OS, p<0.001; PRS, p<0.001). Multivariable analyses revealed that, among patients with non-clear cell, non-mucinous histologies, chemotherapy including taxane and platinum was an independent predictor of favorable survival outcomes. Conversely, in patients with clear cell or mucinous histology, taxane-including platinum-based combination chemotherapy did not improve the OS and PRS compared to a conventional platinum-based regimen which did not include taxanes.
Since the emergence of taxane plus platinum, the prognosis of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer has improved. However, we here demonstrate that this improvement is limited to patients with non-clear cell, non-mucinous histologies.
本研究旨在探讨对复发性卵巢癌患者进行一线化疗时,根据组织学类型分层,对总生存期(OS)和复发后生存期(PRS)的影响。
对 574 名具有充足临床资料(包括一线化疗)的复发性卵巢癌患者进行分析。对病理切片进行中心病理复查。将患者分为两组:A 组(n=261)接受紫杉烷加铂类化疗,B 组(n=313)接受不含紫杉烷的常规铂类化疗。
中位年龄为 54 岁(范围 14 至 89 岁)。A 组的中位 OS(45.0 个月 vs. 30.3 个月,p<0.001)和 PRS(23.0 个月 vs. 13.0 个月,p<0.001)均明显优于 B 组。在透明细胞或黏液性组织学的患者中,两组的 OS 和 PRS 相似。相比之下,在非透明细胞、非黏液性组织学的患者中,A 组的 OS 和 PRS 明显优于 B 组(OS,p<0.001;PRS,p<0.001)。多变量分析显示,在非透明细胞、非黏液性组织学的患者中,包括紫杉烷和铂类的化疗是生存结局良好的独立预测因素。相反,在透明细胞或黏液性组织学的患者中,与不包括紫杉烷的常规铂类方案相比,紫杉烷联合铂类的联合化疗并不能改善 OS 和 PRS。
自从紫杉醇加铂类药物出现以来,复发性卵巢癌患者的预后有所改善。然而,我们在此表明,这种改善仅限于非透明细胞、非黏液性组织学的患者。