Suppr超能文献

胰岛素抵抗与非糖尿病女性较低的乙酰胆碱诱导的微血管反应性相关。

Insulin resistance is associated with lower acetylcholine-induced microvascular reactivity in nondiabetic women.

作者信息

Pienaar Paula R, Micklesfield Lisa K, Levitt Naomi S, Gooding Kim, Shore Angela C, Goedecke Julia H, Gill Jason M R, Lambert Estelle V

机构信息

1 UCT/MRC Research Unit for Exercise Science and Sports Medicine, Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town , Cape Town, South Africa .

出版信息

Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2014 Apr;12(3):178-84. doi: 10.1089/met.2013.0126. Epub 2014 Jan 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The association between insulin resistance and microvascular dysfunction is well established in obese individuals with type 2 diabetes. It is unclear whether this relationship is dependent on obesity and body fat in insulin-resistant persons. This study investigated acetylcholine (ACh)-induced microvascular reactivity in apparently healthy women (n=37, 20-45 years), with and without insulin resistance.

METHODS

Body fat mass (dual X-ray absorptiometry), waist circumference (WC), blood pressure, fasting glucose, insulin, and free fatty acid concentrations were measured. Insulin resistance was estimated using homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), and subjects were divided into insulin-resistant (IR, n=16) and insulin-sensitive (IS, n=21) groups. ACh-induced forearm microvascular reactivity was measured by laser Doppler imagery using iontophoresis of ACh and compared between groups adjusting for WC and skin resistance (SR).

RESULTS

The IR group had a higher body mass index (BMI) (30.7 ± 6.4 vs. 22.9 ± 7.3 kg/m(2), P < 0.01), fat mass (34.7 ± 11.9 vs. 19.7 ± 9.6 kg, P < 0.01), WC (89.9 ± 13.6 vs. 74.4 ± 9.7 cm, P < 0.01), and a lower SR (0.24 ± 0.08 vs. 0.32 ± 0.08 Ω, P < 0.05) than the IS group. Microvascular reactivity, expressed as percentage increase in perfusion from baseline, was significantly lower in IR subjects after adjusting for differences in WC and SR (420.9 ± 166.5 vs. 511.6 ± 214.8%, P < 0.05). There were associations between microvascular reactivity and SR (r=-0.34, P < 0.05) and systolic blood pressure (r=-0.36, P < 0.05), but not BMI, body fat mass, WC, or HOMA-IR.

CONCLUSION

ACh-induced microvascular reactivity was different between IR and IS apparently healthy, nondiabetic women once differences in WC and SR were accounted for.

摘要

背景

在患有2型糖尿病的肥胖个体中,胰岛素抵抗与微血管功能障碍之间的关联已得到充分证实。目前尚不清楚这种关系在胰岛素抵抗人群中是否依赖于肥胖和体脂。本研究调查了乙酰胆碱(ACh)诱导的微血管反应性,研究对象为37名年龄在20至45岁之间、表面健康的女性,她们有的存在胰岛素抵抗,有的不存在胰岛素抵抗。

方法

测量体脂量(双能X线吸收法)、腰围(WC)、血压、空腹血糖、胰岛素和游离脂肪酸浓度。使用胰岛素抵抗稳态模型评估(HOMA-IR)来估算胰岛素抵抗,并将受试者分为胰岛素抵抗组(IR,n = 16)和胰岛素敏感组(IS,n = 21)。通过使用ACh离子导入法的激光多普勒成像测量ACh诱导的前臂微血管反应性,并在调整WC和皮肤电阻(SR)后对两组进行比较。

结果

与IS组相比,IR组的体重指数(BMI)更高(30.7±6.4 vs. 22.9±7.3kg/m²,P < 0.01)、体脂量更高(34.7±11.9 vs. 19.7±9.6kg,P < 0.01)、WC更高(89.9±13.6 vs. 74.4±9.7cm,P < 0.01),而SR更低(0.24±0.08 vs. 0.32±0.08Ω,P < 0.05)。在调整WC和SR差异后,以灌注相对于基线的百分比增加表示的微血管反应性在IR受试者中显著更低(420.9±166.5 vs. 511.6±214.8%,P < 0.05)。微血管反应性与SR(r = -0.34,P < 0.05)和收缩压(r = -0.36,P < 0.05)之间存在关联,但与BMI、体脂量、WC或HOMA-IR无关。

结论

一旦考虑了WC和SR的差异,ACh诱导的微血管反应性在IR和IS表面健康的非糖尿病女性之间存在差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验