Department of Neurology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming 650031, China.
J Neuroinflammation. 2014 Jan 24;11:15. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-11-15.
Ischemic postconditioning has been demonstrated to be a protective procedure to brain damage caused by transient focal ischemia/reperfusion. However, it is elusive whether the protection of postconditioning against brain damage and neuroinflammation is via regulating TLR2 and TLR4 pathways. In the present study, we examined the protection of ischemic postconditioning performed immediately prior to the recovery of cerebral blood supply on brain damage caused by various duration of ischemia and tested the hypothesis that its protection is via inhibition of neuroinflammation by modulating TLR2/TLR4 pathways.
Brain damage in rats was induced by using the middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) model. Ischemic postconditioning consisting of fivecycles of ten seconds of ischemia and reperfusion was performed immediately following theischemic episode Theduration of administration of ischemic postconditioning was examined by comparing its effects on infarction volume, cerebral edema and neurological function in 2, 3, 4, 4.5and 6 hour ischemia groups. The protective mechanism of ischemic postconditioning was investigated by comparing its effects on apoptosis, production of the neurotoxic cytokine IL-1β and the transcription and expression of TLR2, TLR4 and IRAK4 in the 2 and 4.5 hour ischemia groups.
Ischemic postconditioning significantly attenuated cerebral infarction, cerebral edema and neurological dysfunction in ischemia groups of up to 4 hours duration, but not in 4.5and 6 hour ischemia groups. It also inhibited apoptosis, production of IL-1β, abnormal transcription and expression of TLR2, TLR4 and IRAK4 in the 2 hour ischemia group, but not in the 4.5 hour ischemia group.
Ischemic postconditioning protected brain damage caused by 2, 3 and 4 hours of ischemia, but not by 4.5 and 6 hours of ischemia. The protection of ischemic postconditioning is associated with its inhibition of neuroinflammation via inhibition of TLR2 and TLR4 pathways.
缺血后处理已被证实可减轻短暂性局灶性缺血/再灌注引起的脑损伤。然而,其对脑损伤和神经炎症的保护作用是否通过调节 TLR2 和 TLR4 途径尚不清楚。在本研究中,我们检测了即刻恢复脑血流供应前进行的缺血后处理对不同缺血时间引起的脑损伤的保护作用,并提出假设,即通过调节 TLR2/TLR4 途径抑制神经炎症来实现其保护作用。
采用大脑中动脉闭塞(MCAO)模型诱导大鼠脑损伤。缺血后处理包括 5 个 10 秒的缺血/再灌注周期,在缺血发作后立即进行。通过比较缺血后处理对 2、3、4、4.5 和 6 小时缺血组梗死体积、脑水肿和神经功能的影响,检测其给药时间。通过比较缺血后处理对 2 和 4.5 小时缺血组细胞凋亡、神经毒性细胞因子 IL-1β产生以及 TLR2、TLR4 和 IRAK4 的转录和表达的影响,探讨缺血后处理的保护机制。
缺血后处理显著减轻了 2 至 4 小时缺血组的脑梗死、脑水肿和神经功能障碍,但对 4.5 和 6 小时缺血组无明显作用。它还抑制了 2 小时缺血组细胞凋亡、IL-1β产生、TLR2、TLR4 和 IRAK4 的异常转录和表达,但对 4.5 小时缺血组无明显作用。
缺血后处理可保护 2、3 和 4 小时的缺血性脑损伤,但对 4.5 和 6 小时的缺血性脑损伤无保护作用。缺血后处理的保护作用与其通过抑制 TLR2 和 TLR4 途径抑制神经炎症有关。