Suppr超能文献

乳腺缩小视野扩散加权成像的研究

Study of the reduced field-of-view diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast.

作者信息

Dong Haibo, Li Yadi, Li Hui, Wang Bo, Hu Bin

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Lihuili Hospital of Ningbo Medical Center, Ningbo, Zhejiang, 315041, People's Republic of China.

Department of Radiology, Lihuili Hospital of Ningbo Medical Center, Ningbo, Zhejiang, 315041, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Clin Breast Cancer. 2014 Aug;14(4):265-71. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2013.12.001. Epub 2013 Dec 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the imaging quality, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values, and application values between reduced field-of-view diffusion-weighted imaging (rFOV DWI) and single-shot echo-planar-imaging diffusion-weighted imaging (SS-EPI DWI) of breast tissue.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

For 87 cases (75 with normal breast tissue, 12 with mammary cancer), breasts were scanned with SS-EPI DWI and rFOV DWI (b values, 800 s/mm(2)). Image quality and ADC values of breast tissue images were compared between SS-EPI DWI and rFOV DWI.

RESULTS

The average image quality score for the 87 cases was 4.73 in rFOV DWI and 3.62 in SS-EPI DWI. The difference was statistically significant (P < .01). The resolution of rFOV DWI was 2.25 mm × 1.23 mm, which was higher than the resolution of SS-EPI DWI (2.25 mm × 2.25 mm). The mean ADC value of 75 cases with normal breast tissue was 1.696 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s by rFOV DWI and 1.832 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s by SS-EPI DWI, and the difference was statistically significant (P < .01). The mean ADC value for the 12 cases with breast cancer was 1.065 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s by rFOV DWI and 1.192 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s by SS-EPI DWI, which was a statistically significant difference (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

rFOV DWI presented images with higher resolution and less distortion than SS-EPI DWI, and this difference may be helpful in disease diagnosis.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较乳腺组织的缩小视野扩散加权成像(rFOV DWI)与单次激发回波平面成像扩散加权成像(SS-EPI DWI)之间的成像质量、表观扩散系数(ADC)值及应用价值。

患者与方法

对87例患者(75例乳腺组织正常,12例患有乳腺癌)进行SS-EPI DWI和rFOV DWI扫描(b值为800 s/mm²)。比较SS-EPI DWI和rFOV DWI乳腺组织图像的质量及ADC值。

结果

87例患者中,rFOV DWI的平均图像质量评分为4.73分,SS-EPI DWI为3.62分。差异具有统计学意义(P <.01)。rFOV DWI的分辨率为2.25 mm×1.23 mm,高于SS-EPI DWI的分辨率(2.25 mm×2.25 mm)。75例乳腺组织正常患者的rFOV DWI平均ADC值为1.696×10⁻³ mm²/s,SS-EPI DWI为1.832×10⁻³ mm²/s,差异具有统计学意义(P <.01)。12例乳腺癌患者的rFOV DWI平均ADC值为1.065×10⁻³ mm²/s,SS-EPI DWI为1.192×10⁻³ mm²/s,差异具有统计学意义(P <.05)。

结论

与SS-EPI DWI相比,rFOV DWI呈现的图像分辨率更高、失真更小,这种差异可能有助于疾病诊断。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验