Seeger Achim, Schulze Maximilian, Schuettauf Frank, Ernemann Ulrike, Hauser Till-Karsten
1 Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Germany.
2 Radiologiepraxis Tübingen, Germany.
Neuroradiol J. 2018 Apr;31(2):126-132. doi: 10.1177/1971400918757711. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
Objective The objective of this article is to evaluate advanced techniques of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements of the optic nerve in patients with optic neuritis. Methods In this prospective and institutional review board-approved trial, we examined 15 patients with acute visual loss and clinical signs of optic neuritis including thin-slice multi-shot segmented readout of long variable echo trains (rs-EPI, RESOLVE) DWI and reduced field-of view DWI using a parallel transmit system (rFOV-EPI). Conventional single-shot echo-planar DWI (ss-EPI) of the whole brain was available in 13 patients. Subjective image quality was compared using a four-point scale and objective ADC measurements were performed in comparison with the non-affected side. Results In the intraorbital segment, subjective image quality was significantly higher in rFOV-EPI (score 3.3 ± 0.8) compared with rs-EPI (score 2.1 ± 0.8) and ss-EPI (score 0.9 ± 0.8). Diagnosis was hampered in the canalicular segment ( n = 3) and the intracranial segment ( n = 1) in all applied DWI techniques. ADC measurements of the affected side differed significantly in all DWI sequences ss-EPI (sensitivity 54%, accuracy 77%), rs-EPI (sensitivity 71%, accuracy 86%), and rFOV-EPI (sensitivity 73%, accuracy 87%). Conclusion Optic neuritis in the intraorbital segment can be detected with high sensitivity without the need for contrast application. Using rFOV-EPI improves subjective image quality compared with rs-EPI and ss-EPI. Due to its higher spatial resolution, rFOV-EPI was the preferred technique in our study and can ensure the diagnosis in the intraorbital segment. However, artefacts occur in the canalicular and intracranial segment of the optic nerve, therefore contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images must still be considered as the gold standard.
目的 本文旨在评估视神经炎患者视神经的扩散加权成像(DWI)和表观扩散系数(ADC)测量的先进技术。方法 在这项经机构审查委员会批准的前瞻性试验中,我们检查了15例急性视力丧失且有视神经炎临床体征的患者,采用了包括长可变回波链的薄层多激发分段读出(rs-EPI,RESOLVE)DWI以及使用并行发射系统的缩小视野DWI(rFOV-EPI)。13例患者有全脑的传统单次激发回波平面DWI(ss-EPI)。使用四点量表比较主观图像质量,并与未受影响侧进行客观ADC测量。结果 在眶内段,rFOV-EPI的主观图像质量(评分3.3±0.8)显著高于rs-EPI(评分2.1±0.8)和ss-EPI(评分0.9±0.8)。在所有应用的DWI技术中,小管段(n = 3)和颅内段(n = 1)的诊断受到阻碍。所有DWI序列中患侧的ADC测量值差异显著,ss-EPI(敏感性54%,准确性77%)、rs-EPI(敏感性71%,准确性86%)和rFOV-EPI(敏感性73%,准确性87%)。结论 眶内段视神经炎无需使用对比剂即可高灵敏度检测。与rs-EPI和ss-EPI相比,使用rFOV-EPI可提高主观图像质量。由于其更高的空间分辨率,rFOV-EPI是我们研究中的首选技术,可确保眶内段的诊断。然而,视神经的小管段和颅内段会出现伪影,因此对比增强T1加权图像仍必须被视为金标准。