Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, China.
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 31;19(10):e0313011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313011. eCollection 2024.
This study compared field-of-view (FOV) optimized and constrained undistorted single-shot diffusion-weighted imaging (FOCUS DWI) with deep-learning-based reconstruction (DLR) to conventional DWI for breast imaging.
This study prospectively enrolled 49 female patients suspected of breast cancer from July to December 2023. The patients underwent conventional and FOCUS breast DWI and data were reconstructed with and without DLR. Two radiologists independently evaluated three images per patient using a 5-point Likert scale. Objective evaluations, including signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), were conducted using manual region of interest-based analysis. The subjective and objective evaluations were compared using the Friedman test.
The scores for the overall image quality, anatomical details, lesion conspicuity, artifacts, and distortion in FOCUS-DLR DWI were higher than in conventional DWI (all P < 0.001). The SNR of FOCUS-DLR DWI was higher than that of conventional and FOCUS DWI (both P < 0.001), while FOCUS and conventional DWI were similar (P = 0.096). Conventional, FOCUS, and FOCUS-DLR DWI had similar CNR and ADC values.
Our findings indicate that images produced by FOCUS-DLR DWI were superior to conventional DWI, supporting the applicability of this technique in clinical practice. DLR provides a new approach to optimize breast DWI.
本研究旨在比较视野优化和约束无失真单次扩散加权成像(FOCUS DWI)与基于深度学习的重建(DLR)与常规 DWI 对乳腺成像的效果。
本研究前瞻性纳入 2023 年 7 月至 12 月期间 49 名疑似乳腺癌的女性患者。患者接受了常规和 FOCUS 乳腺 DWI 检查,并分别采用和不采用 DLR 进行数据重建。两位放射科医生使用 5 分制 Likert 量表对每位患者的三张图像进行独立评估。使用手动感兴趣区分析进行客观评估,包括信噪比(SNR)、对比噪声比(CNR)和表观扩散系数(ADC)。采用 Friedman 检验比较主观和客观评估结果。
FOCUS-DLR DWI 的整体图像质量、解剖细节、病灶显示、伪影和变形评分均高于常规 DWI(均 P < 0.001)。FOCUS-DLR DWI 的 SNR 高于常规和 FOCUS DWI(均 P < 0.001),而 FOCUS 和常规 DWI 之间无显著差异(P = 0.096)。常规、FOCUS 和 FOCUS-DLR DWI 的 CNR 和 ADC 值相似。
本研究结果表明,FOCUS-DLR DWI 生成的图像优于常规 DWI,支持该技术在临床实践中的应用。DLR 为优化乳腺 DWI 提供了一种新方法。