• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Willingness to participate in accountable care organizations: health care managers' perspective.参与责任医疗组织的意愿:医疗保健管理者的视角。
Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2014 Jan-Mar;33(1):64-74. doi: 10.1097/01.HCM.0000440625.92879.e8.
2
Predictors of Rural Health Clinics Managers' Willingness to Join Accountable Care Organizations.农村医疗诊所管理者加入 accountable care organizations 的意愿的预测因素。 (注:Accountable Care Organizations 可译为“责任医疗组织”,但原文未翻译,直接保留英文更合适,因为这是一个特定的专业术语,在医疗领域可能常用英文表述。)
Res Sociol Health Care. 2014;32:259-273. doi: 10.1108/S0275-495920140000032023.
3
Accountable care organizations: benefits and barriers as perceived by Rural Health Clinic management.accountable care organizations:乡村健康诊所管理层所认为的益处与障碍
Rural Remote Health. 2013 Apr-Jun;13(2):2417. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
4
Barriers and Facilitators to Implementation of Value-Based Care Models in New Medicaid Accountable Care Organizations in Massachusetts: A Study Protocol.马萨诸塞州新的 Medicaid 责任医疗组织中实施基于价值的护理模式的障碍和促进因素:研究方案。
Front Public Health. 2021 Apr 6;9:645665. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.645665. eCollection 2021.
5
Trust, Money, and Power: Life Cycle Dynamics in Alliances Between Management Partners and Accountable Care Organizations.信任、金钱和权力:管理合伙人与问责制医疗组织之间联盟的生命周期动态。
Milbank Q. 2018 Dec;96(4):755-781. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12356.
6
The new frontier of strategic alliances in health care: New partnerships under accountable care organizations.医疗保健战略联盟的新前沿:责任医疗组织下的新伙伴关系。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Oct;190:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.04.054. Epub 2017 May 2.
7
Medicaid Accountable Care Organizations in Four States: Implementation and Early Impacts.四个州的医疗补助管理式医疗组织:实施与早期影响。
Milbank Q. 2019 Jun;97(2):583-619. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12386. Epub 2019 Apr 7.
8
Alterations in 90-day morbidity, mortality, and readmission rates following spine surgery in Medicare Accountable Care Organizations (2009-2014).医疗保险问责医疗组织(2009-2014 年)脊柱手术后 90 天内发病率、死亡率和再入院率的变化。
Spine J. 2019 Jan;19(1):8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.06.367. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
9
Accountable Care Organizations in the United States: market and demographic factors associated with formation.美国的问责制医疗组织:与组建相关的市场和人口统计学因素。
Health Serv Res. 2013 Dec;48(6 Pt 1):1840-58. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12102. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
10
Characteristics of Rural Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) – A Survey of Medicare ACOs with Rural Presence.农村责任医疗组织(ACO)的特征——对有农村业务的医疗保险ACO的一项调查。
Rural Policy Brief. 2015 May 1(2015 8):1-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Longitudinal participation in delivery and payment reform programs among US Primary Care Organizations.美国初级保健组织参与分娩和支付改革计划的纵向研究。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb;57(1):47-55. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13646. Epub 2021 Feb 28.
2
Health Information Technology and Accountable Care Organizations: A Systematic Review and Future Directions.健康信息技术与可问责医疗组织:系统综述及未来方向
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2019 Jul 8;7(1):24. doi: 10.5334/egems.261.
3
Cost of Practice Transformation in Primary Care: Joining an Accountable Care Organization.基层医疗实践转型的成本:加入责任医疗组织。
J Health Care Finance. 2018 Winter;44(3).
4
Does Patient-Centered Medical Home Recognition Relate to Accountable Care Organization Participation?以患者为中心的医疗之家认证与 accountable care organization 的参与有关吗? (注:这里“accountable care organization”直译为“可问责医疗组织”,在医疗领域一般有特定含义,可根据具体语境进一步优化表述,比如“负责医疗组织”等 )
Popul Health Manag. 2018 Jun;21(3):188-195. doi: 10.1089/pop.2017.0096. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
5
Facilitators and barriers to implementing electronic referral and/or consultation systems: a qualitative study of 16 health organizations.实施电子转诊和/或会诊系统的促进因素和障碍:对16个卫生组织的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec 19;15:568. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1233-1.

本文引用的文献

1
The Affordable Care Act: the ethical call for value-based leadership to transform quality.《平价医疗法案》:基于价值的领导力变革医疗质量的伦理诉求。
Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2013 Jul-Sep;32(3):227-32. doi: 10.1097/HCM.0b013e31829d7355.
2
Effects of health guidance on outpatient and pharmacy expenditures: a disease- and drug-specific 3-year observational study using propensity-score matching.健康指导对门诊和药房支出的影响:采用倾向评分匹配的疾病和药物特异性 3 年观察性研究。
J Epidemiol. 2013;23(4):262-9. doi: 10.2188/jea.je20120136. Epub 2013 Jun 1.
3
Hospitals on the path to accountable care: highlights from a 2011 national survey of hospital readiness to participate in an accountable care organization.走向可问责医疗之路的医院:2011年全国医院参与可问责医疗组织准备情况调查要点
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2012 Aug;22:1-12.
4
The potential of Medicare accountable care organizations to transform the American health care marketplace: rhetoric and reality.医疗保险责任医疗组织改变美国医疗市场的潜力:言辞与现实。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2012 Aug;87(8):707-9. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.06.005.
5
Medicare program; Medicare Shared Savings Program: Accountable Care Organizations. Final rule.医疗保险计划;医疗保险共享储蓄计划: accountable care organizations。最终规则。 (注:Accountable Care Organizations 可译为“ accountable care organizations”,直译为“可问责医疗组织”,是美国医疗领域的一种组织形式,这里保留英文是因为在医保相关语境中可能有特定含义,具体翻译可根据实际情况调整更准确的表述。)
Fed Regist. 2011 Nov 2;76(212):67802-990.
6
Accountable care organizations: the proposed regulations and the prospects for success.责任医疗组织:拟议法规与成功前景。
Am J Manag Care. 2011;17(8):560-8.
7
Launching accountable care organizations--the proposed rule for the Medicare Shared Savings Program.启动 accountable care organizations——医疗保险共享节约计划的拟议规则。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Apr 21;364(16):e32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1103602. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
8
A national strategy to put accountable care into practice.实施问责制医疗的国家战略。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 May;29(5):982-90. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0194.
9
A comparison of propensity score methods: a case-study estimating the effectiveness of post-AMI statin use.倾向评分方法的比较:一项评估急性心肌梗死后使用他汀类药物有效性的案例研究。
Stat Med. 2006 Jun 30;25(12):2084-106. doi: 10.1002/sim.2328.
10
Propensity score methods in drug safety studies: practice, strengths and limitations.药物安全性研究中的倾向评分方法:实践、优势与局限
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2001 Jun-Jul;10(4):341-4. doi: 10.1002/pds.656.

参与责任医疗组织的意愿:医疗保健管理者的视角。

Willingness to participate in accountable care organizations: health care managers' perspective.

作者信息

Wan Thomas T H, Demachkie Masri Maysoun, Ortiz Judith, Lin Blossom Y J

机构信息

Author Affiliations: College of Health and Public Affairs (Dr Wan), Department of Health Management and Informatics (Dr Masri), and Rural Health Research Group (Dr Ortiz), College of Health and Public Affairs, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida; and Department of Health Care Administration and Policy, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan (Dr Lin).

出版信息

Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2014 Jan-Mar;33(1):64-74. doi: 10.1097/01.HCM.0000440625.92879.e8.

DOI:10.1097/01.HCM.0000440625.92879.e8
PMID:24463593
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4050369/
Abstract

This study examines how health care managers responded to the accountable care organization (ACO). The effect of perceived benefits and barriers of the commitment to develop a strategic plan for ACOs and willingness to participate in ACOs is analyzed, using organizational social capital, health information technology uses, health systems integration and size of the health networks, geographic factors, and knowledge about ACOs as predictors. Propensity score matching and analysis are used to adjust the state and regional variations. When the number of perceived benefits is greater than the number of perceived barriers, health care managers are more likely to reveal a stronger commitment to develop a strategic plan for ACO adoption. Health care managers who perceived their organizations as lacking leadership support or commitment, financial incentives, and legal and regulatory support to ACO adoption were less willing to participate in ACOs in the future. Future research should gather more diverse views from a larger sample size of health professionals regarding ACO participation. The perspective of health care managers should be seriously considered in the adoption of an innovative health care delivery system. The transparency on policy formulation should consider multiple views of health care managers.

摘要

本研究考察了医疗保健管理人员对 accountable care organization(ACO,负责医疗组织)的应对方式。分析了对制定 ACO 战略计划的承诺所感知到的益处和障碍以及参与 ACO 的意愿的影响,使用组织社会资本、健康信息技术应用、医疗系统整合、医疗网络规模、地理因素以及对 ACO 的了解作为预测因素。倾向得分匹配和分析用于调整州和地区差异。当感知到的益处数量大于感知到的障碍数量时,医疗保健管理人员更有可能表现出对制定采用 ACO 的战略计划的更强承诺。那些认为其组织缺乏对采用 ACO 的领导支持或承诺、财务激励以及法律和监管支持的医疗保健管理人员未来参与 ACO 的意愿较低。未来的研究应该从更大样本量的医疗专业人员那里收集更多样化的关于参与 ACO 的观点。在采用创新的医疗保健提供系统时,应认真考虑医疗保健管理人员的观点。政策制定的透明度应考虑医疗保健管理人员的多种观点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92f8/4050369/32c79f8de0c3/nihms577647f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92f8/4050369/745893091370/nihms577647f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92f8/4050369/cc4e651b2b0d/nihms577647f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92f8/4050369/32c79f8de0c3/nihms577647f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92f8/4050369/745893091370/nihms577647f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92f8/4050369/cc4e651b2b0d/nihms577647f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92f8/4050369/32c79f8de0c3/nihms577647f3.jpg