Hayes Jason, Borges Bruno, Armstrong Derek, Srinivasan Ilavajady
Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Paediatr Anaesth. 2014 May;24(5):510-5. doi: 10.1111/pan.12355. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
Insertion of needles into the spinal or epidural space is an important component of modern anesthetic practice. Needles are usually inserted at or below the L3-L4 intervertebral space to minimize the risk of spinal cord injury. Manual palpation is the most common method for identifying intervertebral spaces. However, anesthesiologists are increasingly using ultrasonography to guide the placement of regional, including neuraxial, anesthetic, and analgesic blocks. We undertook an observational study to compare the accuracy of manual palpation and ultrasound for determining the L3-L4 intervertebral space level.
Thirty children 0-12 years of age undergoing lumbar puncture were enrolled. For each subject, an anesthesiologist, using the landmark palpation method, determined the point on a radio-opaque ruler that corresponded to the L3-L4 intervertebral space. A different anesthesiologist using the ultrasound method repeated this measurement. Fluoroscopy was then used to confirm the accuracy of each technique. The proportion of inaccurate measurements and the effects of anesthesiologists' experience, patient age, and size on the accuracy of each technique were compared.
Thirty-seven percent of measurements by the landmark palpation method were inaccurate by ≥1 levels cephalad to the L3-L4 intervertebral space. However, less experienced anesthesiologists (residents and fellows) made a disproportionate number of inaccurate measurements compared to consultants. Twenty-three percent of measurements by the ultrasound method were inaccurate by ≥1 cephalad levels. The BMI-for-age percentile/weight-for-length percentile was higher in patients in whom either technique was inaccurate.
This observational study found no difference in the accuracy of landmark palpation, when performed by a consultant anesthesiologist, and ultrasound for determining the L3-L4 intervertebral space in children.
将针插入脊髓或硬膜外腔是现代麻醉实践的重要组成部分。通常在L3-L4椎间隙或其下方进针,以尽量降低脊髓损伤风险。手法触诊是识别椎间隙最常用的方法。然而,麻醉医生越来越多地使用超声来引导区域麻醉(包括神经轴阻滞麻醉和镇痛阻滞)的穿刺定位。我们进行了一项观察性研究,比较手法触诊和超声在确定L3-L4椎间隙水平方面的准确性。
纳入30例0至12岁接受腰椎穿刺的儿童。对于每例受试者,一名麻醉医生采用标志性触诊法确定不透X线标尺上对应L3-L4椎间隙的点。另一名麻醉医生采用超声法重复该测量。然后使用荧光透视法确认每种技术的准确性。比较测量不准确的比例以及麻醉医生经验、患者年龄和体型对每种技术准确性的影响。
标志性触诊法测量结果中,37%在L3-L4椎间隙头侧≥1个节段处不准确。然而,与会诊医生相比,经验不足的麻醉医生(住院医生和专科住院医生)做出的不准确测量比例过高。超声法测量结果中,23%在头侧≥1个节段处不准确。采用任何一种技术测量不准确的患者,其年龄别BMI百分位数/身长别体重百分位数更高。
这项观察性研究发现,会诊麻醉医生进行的标志性触诊法与超声在确定儿童L3-L4椎间隙方面的准确性没有差异。