Suppr超能文献

在儿童中,手动触诊与超声检查用于识别L3-L4椎间隙水平的准确性比较。

Accuracy of manual palpation vs ultrasound for identifying the L3-L4 intervertebral space level in children.

作者信息

Hayes Jason, Borges Bruno, Armstrong Derek, Srinivasan Ilavajady

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Paediatr Anaesth. 2014 May;24(5):510-5. doi: 10.1111/pan.12355. Epub 2014 Jan 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Insertion of needles into the spinal or epidural space is an important component of modern anesthetic practice. Needles are usually inserted at or below the L3-L4 intervertebral space to minimize the risk of spinal cord injury. Manual palpation is the most common method for identifying intervertebral spaces. However, anesthesiologists are increasingly using ultrasonography to guide the placement of regional, including neuraxial, anesthetic, and analgesic blocks. We undertook an observational study to compare the accuracy of manual palpation and ultrasound for determining the L3-L4 intervertebral space level.

METHODS

Thirty children 0-12 years of age undergoing lumbar puncture were enrolled. For each subject, an anesthesiologist, using the landmark palpation method, determined the point on a radio-opaque ruler that corresponded to the L3-L4 intervertebral space. A different anesthesiologist using the ultrasound method repeated this measurement. Fluoroscopy was then used to confirm the accuracy of each technique. The proportion of inaccurate measurements and the effects of anesthesiologists' experience, patient age, and size on the accuracy of each technique were compared.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven percent of measurements by the landmark palpation method were inaccurate by ≥1 levels cephalad to the L3-L4 intervertebral space. However, less experienced anesthesiologists (residents and fellows) made a disproportionate number of inaccurate measurements compared to consultants. Twenty-three percent of measurements by the ultrasound method were inaccurate by ≥1 cephalad levels. The BMI-for-age percentile/weight-for-length percentile was higher in patients in whom either technique was inaccurate.

CONCLUSION

This observational study found no difference in the accuracy of landmark palpation, when performed by a consultant anesthesiologist, and ultrasound for determining the L3-L4 intervertebral space in children.

摘要

背景

将针插入脊髓或硬膜外腔是现代麻醉实践的重要组成部分。通常在L3-L4椎间隙或其下方进针,以尽量降低脊髓损伤风险。手法触诊是识别椎间隙最常用的方法。然而,麻醉医生越来越多地使用超声来引导区域麻醉(包括神经轴阻滞麻醉和镇痛阻滞)的穿刺定位。我们进行了一项观察性研究,比较手法触诊和超声在确定L3-L4椎间隙水平方面的准确性。

方法

纳入30例0至12岁接受腰椎穿刺的儿童。对于每例受试者,一名麻醉医生采用标志性触诊法确定不透X线标尺上对应L3-L4椎间隙的点。另一名麻醉医生采用超声法重复该测量。然后使用荧光透视法确认每种技术的准确性。比较测量不准确的比例以及麻醉医生经验、患者年龄和体型对每种技术准确性的影响。

结果

标志性触诊法测量结果中,37%在L3-L4椎间隙头侧≥1个节段处不准确。然而,与会诊医生相比,经验不足的麻醉医生(住院医生和专科住院医生)做出的不准确测量比例过高。超声法测量结果中,23%在头侧≥1个节段处不准确。采用任何一种技术测量不准确的患者,其年龄别BMI百分位数/身长别体重百分位数更高。

结论

这项观察性研究发现,会诊麻醉医生进行的标志性触诊法与超声在确定儿童L3-L4椎间隙方面的准确性没有差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验