Whitty Robert, Moore Michael, Macarthur Alison
Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Ave. Suite 1514, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1X5.
Anesth Analg. 2008 Feb;106(2):538-40, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31816069d9.
Palpation has been shown to be inaccurate at identifying lumbar interspinous spaces. Our goal in this study was to compare ultrasound imaging of the region to palpation.
Using ultrasound in the postpartum period, we estimated the interspinous level used for obstetric neuraxial anesthesia in 121 women and compared this estimation with the level estimated by palpation and documented in the chart by the anesthesiologist.
In 67 of 121 (55%) patients, the vertebral level of the puncture mark documented by the treating anesthesiologist was in agreement with vertebral level as assessed using ultrasound, and in 39 (32%) women, the skin puncture level was estimated by ultrasound to be at least one interspace higher. The unweighted kappa was 0.08 (95% confidence interval: 0.02, 0.14).
There was poor agreement between palpation and ultrasound estimation of the specific lumbar interspace, and when there was disagreement, the ultrasound estimate was more often higher than the palpitation estimate.
已证明触诊在识别腰椎棘突间隙时不准确。本研究的目的是将该区域的超声成像与触诊进行比较。
在产后期间使用超声,我们估计了121名女性用于产科椎管内麻醉的棘突间隙水平,并将该估计值与触诊估计值以及麻醉医生在图表中记录的水平进行比较。
在121名患者中的67名(55%)中,主治麻醉医生记录的穿刺标记的椎体水平与使用超声评估的椎体水平一致,在39名(32%)女性中,超声估计的皮肤穿刺水平至少高一个间隙。未加权kappa值为0.08(95%置信区间:0.02,0.14)。
触诊与超声对特定腰椎间隙的估计之间一致性较差,当出现不一致时,超声估计值比触诊估计值更常偏高。