• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较困扰温度计(DT)与患者健康问卷(PHQ-2)用于筛查新诊断为晚期癌症患者中可能的抑郁病例。

Comparing the distress thermometer (DT) with the patient health questionnaire (PHQ)-2 for screening for possible cases of depression among patients newly diagnosed with advanced cancer.

机构信息

Yale University School of Nursing, New Haven, Connecticut.

出版信息

Palliat Support Care. 2014 Feb;12(1):63-8. doi: 10.1017/S1478951513000394.

DOI:10.1017/S1478951513000394
PMID:24468423
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Distress screening guidelines call for rapid screening for emotional distress at the time of cancer diagnosis. The purpose of this study was to examine the distress thermometer's (DT) ability to screen in patients in treatment for advanced cancer who may be depressed.

METHODS

Using cross-sectional data collected from patients within 30 days of diagnosis with advanced cancer, this study used ROC analysis to determine the optimal-cutoff point of the distress thermometer (DT) for screening for depression as measured by the physician health questionnaire (PHQ)-9; inter-test reliability analysis to compare the DT with the PHQ-2 for screening in possible cases of depression, and multivariate analysis to examine associations among the DT emotional problem list (EPL) items with cases of depression.

RESULTS

The average age of the 123 patients in the study was 59.9 (12.9) years. Seventy (56.9%) were female. All had Stage 3 or 4 cancers (40% gastrointestinal, 19% gynecologic, 20% head and neck, 21% lung). The mean DT score was 4 (2.7)/10; and 56 (43%) were depressed as measured by the PHQ-9 ≥ 5. The optimal DT cut-off score to screen in possible cases of depression was ≥ 2/10, with a sensitivity of .96, compared to a sensitivity of .32 of the PHQ-2 ≥ 2. Correlation coefficients for the DT ≥ 2 and the PHQ-2 with the PHQ-9 ≥ 5 were 0.4 and -0.2, respectively. EPL items associated with cases of depression were Depression (OR = 0.15, 0.02-0.85) and Sadness (OR = 0.21, 0.06-0.72).

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

The optimal DT threshold for identifying possible cases of depression at the time of diagnosis is ≥ 2; this threshold is more sensitive than the PHQ-2 ≥ 2. EPL items may be used with the DT score to triage patients for evaluation.

摘要

目的

困扰筛查指南呼吁在癌症诊断时快速筛查情绪困扰。本研究的目的是检查困扰温度计(DT)在接受晚期癌症治疗的患者中筛查可能抑郁的能力。

方法

本研究使用横断面数据,从诊断为晚期癌症后 30 天内的患者中收集,使用 ROC 分析确定困扰温度计(DT)的最佳截断点,用于筛查由医生健康问卷(PHQ)-9 测量的抑郁;测试间可靠性分析比较 DT 与 PHQ-2 用于筛查可能的抑郁病例,以及多变量分析检查 DT 情绪问题清单(EPL)项目与抑郁病例之间的关联。

结果

本研究中 123 例患者的平均年龄为 59.9(12.9)岁。70 例(56.9%)为女性。所有人都患有 3 期或 4 期癌症(40%胃肠道癌,19%妇科癌,20%头颈部癌,21%肺癌)。DT 评分平均值为 4(2.7)/10;56 例(43%)PHQ-9≥5 为抑郁。DT 筛查可能抑郁病例的最佳截断分数为≥2/10,敏感性为 0.96,而 PHQ-2≥2 的敏感性为 0.32。DT≥2 和 PHQ-2 与 PHQ-9≥5 的相关系数分别为 0.4 和-0.2。与抑郁病例相关的 EPL 项目为抑郁(OR=0.15,0.02-0.85)和悲伤(OR=0.21,0.06-0.72)。

结果的意义

用于识别诊断时可能的抑郁病例的最佳 DT 阈值为≥2;该阈值比 PHQ-2≥2 更敏感。EPL 项目可与 DT 评分一起用于对患者进行分诊评估。

相似文献

1
Comparing the distress thermometer (DT) with the patient health questionnaire (PHQ)-2 for screening for possible cases of depression among patients newly diagnosed with advanced cancer.比较困扰温度计(DT)与患者健康问卷(PHQ-2)用于筛查新诊断为晚期癌症患者中可能的抑郁病例。
Palliat Support Care. 2014 Feb;12(1):63-8. doi: 10.1017/S1478951513000394.
2
What to do with screening for distress scores? Integrating descriptive data into clinical practice.如何处理困扰评分的筛查?将描述性数据纳入临床实践。
Palliat Support Care. 2014 Feb;12(1):25-38. doi: 10.1017/S1478951513000059. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
3
Profile and predictors of global distress: can the DT guide nursing practice in prostate cancer?全球困扰的特征和预测因素:DT 能否指导前列腺癌护理实践?
Palliat Support Care. 2014 Feb;12(1):5-14. doi: 10.1017/S1478951513000060. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
4
Distress and its correlates in Korean cancer patients: pilot use of the distress thermometer and the problem list.韩国癌症患者的痛苦及其相关因素:痛苦温度计和问题清单的初步应用
Psychooncology. 2008 Jun;17(6):548-55. doi: 10.1002/pon.1275.
5
Cancer distress screening data: translating knowledge into clinical action for a quality response.癌症困扰筛查数据:将知识转化为临床行动,以做出高质量反应。
Palliat Support Care. 2014 Feb;12(1):39-51. doi: 10.1017/S1478951513000382. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
6
Sensitivity and specificity of the Distress Thermometer and a two-item depression screen (Patient Health Questionnaire-2) with a 'help' question for psychological distress and psychiatric morbidity in patients with advanced cancer.对于晚期癌症患者,使用“求助”问题的心理困扰 Distress Thermometer 与两项抑郁筛查工具(患者健康问卷-2)在评估心理困扰和精神疾病发病率方面的敏感性和特异性。
Psychooncology. 2012 Dec;21(12):1275-84. doi: 10.1002/pon.2042. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
7
Monitoring patient distress and related problems before and after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.监测造血干细胞移植前后患者的痛苦及相关问题。
Palliat Support Care. 2014 Feb;12(1):53-61. doi: 10.1017/S1478951513000552. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
8
Educational intervention in cancer outpatient clinics on routine screening for emotional distress: an observational study.在癌症门诊常规筛查情绪困扰方面的教育干预:一项观察性研究。
Psychooncology. 2011 Jun;20(6):669-74. doi: 10.1002/pon.1944. Epub 2011 Mar 2.
9
Promoting quality breast cancer care: psychosocial distress screening.促进高质量乳腺癌护理:心理社会困扰筛查。
Palliat Support Care. 2014 Feb;12(1):75-80. doi: 10.1017/S147895151300059X. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
10
Validation of the Distress Thermometer with bone marrow transplant patients.用于骨髓移植患者的痛苦温度计的验证。
Psychooncology. 2006 Jul;15(7):604-12. doi: 10.1002/pon.993.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-Reported Distress in Individuals With Head and Neck Cancer.头颈部癌症患者报告的痛苦
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Feb 1;151(2):160-169. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2024.4357.
2
Predictors of significant distress in cervical cancer patients: a cross sectional study.宫颈癌患者显著痛苦的预测因素:一项横断面研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Jul;310(1):551-560. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07505-2. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
3
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement (PROM) under real-life conditions of non-curable cancer outpatients with the Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale (IPOS) and NCCN-Distress Thermometer - A mixed methods study.
使用综合姑息治疗结果量表(IPOS)和美国国立综合癌症网络苦恼温度计,对无法治愈的癌症门诊患者在现实生活条件下进行患者报告结局测量(PROM)——一项混合方法研究。
PEC Innov. 2024 Feb 12;4:100264. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100264. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Normative values for the distress thermometer (DT) and the emotion thermometers (ET), derived from a German general population sample.从德国一般人群样本中得出的痛苦温度计(DT)和情绪温度计(ET)的常模值。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Jan;28(1):277-282. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-2014-1. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
5
A Patient-Reported Outcome Instrument to Assess Symptom Burden and Predict Survival in Patients with Advanced Cancer: Flipping the Paradigm to Improve Timing of Palliative and End-of-Life Discussions and Reduce Unwanted Health Care Costs.一种用于评估晚期癌症患者症状负担和预测生存的患者报告结局工具:颠覆范式以改善姑息治疗和生命末期讨论的时机并降低不必要的医疗保健成本。
Oncologist. 2019 Jan;24(1):76-85. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0238. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
6
A cross sectional analysis from a single institution's experience of psychosocial distress and health-related quality of life in the primary brain tumor population.单家医疗机构原发性脑肿瘤人群的社会心理困扰和健康相关生活质量的横断面分析。
J Neurooncol. 2017 Sep;134(2):363-369. doi: 10.1007/s11060-017-2535-4. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
7
The Advanced Practitioner and Collaborative Practice in Oncology.肿瘤学中的高级从业者与协作实践
J Adv Pract Oncol. 2015 Nov-Dec;6(6):515-27. Epub 2015 Nov 1.
8
Depression Screening Using Daily Mental-Health Ratings from a Smartphone Application for Breast Cancer Patients.使用智能手机应用程序对乳腺癌患者进行每日心理健康评分的抑郁筛查
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Aug 4;18(8):e216. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5598.
9
Symptom management during and after treatment with concurrent chemoradiotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer: A review of the literature and areas for future research.口咽癌同步放化疗期间及治疗后的症状管理:文献综述与未来研究方向
World J Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr 10;7(2):220-6. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v7.i2.220.
10
Predictor Variables and Screening Protocol for Depressive and Anxiety Disorders in Cancer Outpatients.癌症门诊患者抑郁和焦虑症的预测变量及筛查方案
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 8;11(3):e0149421. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149421. eCollection 2016.