Suppr超能文献

并非如此——胸部超声对创伤性气胸的漏诊率较高。

Not so FAST-Chest ultrasound underdiagnoses traumatic pneumothorax.

机构信息

From the Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, Burns and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, UC San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, California.

出版信息

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022 Jan 1;92(1):44-48. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003429.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ultrasonography for trauma is a widely used tool in the initial evaluation of trauma patients with complete ultrasonography of trauma (CUST) demonstrating equivalence to computed tomography (CT) for detecting clinically significant abdominal hemorrhage. Initial reports demonstrated high sensitivity of CUST for the bedside diagnosis of pneumothorax. We hypothesized that the sensitivity of CUST would be greater than initial supine chest radiograph (CXR) for detecting pneumothorax.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with pneumothorax from 2018 through 2020 at a Level I trauma center was performed. Patients included had routine supine CXR and CUST performed prior to intervention as well as confirmatory CT imaging. All CUST were performed during the initial evaluation in the trauma bay by a registered sonographer. All imaging was evaluated by an attending radiologist. Subgroup analysis was performed after excluding occult pneumothorax. Immediate tube thoracostomy was defined as tube placement with confirmatory CXR within 8 hours of admission.

RESULTS

There were 568 patients screened with a diagnosis of pneumothorax, identifying 362 patients with a confirmed pneumothorax in addition to CXR, CUST, and confirmatory CT imaging. The population was 83% male, had a mean age of 45 years, with 85% presenting due to blunt trauma. Sensitivity of CXR for detecting pneumothorax was 43%, while the sensitivity of CUST was 35%. After removal of occult pneumothorax (n = 171), CXR was 78% sensitive, while CUST was 65% sensitive (p < 0.01). In this subgroup, CUST had a false-negative rate of 36% (n = 62). Of those patients with a false-negative CUST, 50% (n = 31) underwent tube thoracostomy, with 85% requiring immediate placement.

CONCLUSION

Complete ultrasonography of trauma performed on initial trauma evaluation had lower sensitivity than CXR for identification of pneumothorax including clinically significant pneumothorax requiring tube thoracostomy. Using CUST as the primary imaging modality in the initial evaluation of chest trauma should be considered with caution.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Test study, Level IV.

摘要

背景

超声检查在创伤患者的初始评估中被广泛应用,完全创伤超声检查(CUST)在检测临床显著腹部出血方面与计算机断层扫描(CT)等效。最初的报告显示,CUST 对气胸的床边诊断具有很高的敏感性。我们假设 CUST 在检测气胸方面的敏感性将高于初始仰卧位胸部 X 线摄影(CXR)。

方法

对 2018 年至 2020 年在一级创伤中心诊断为气胸的患者进行回顾性分析。纳入的患者在干预前常规进行仰卧位 CXR 和 CUST 检查,并进行确认性 CT 成像。所有 CUST 均由注册超声医师在创伤室进行初始评估时进行。所有影像学均由主治放射科医师进行评估。排除隐匿性气胸后进行亚组分析。立即进行胸腔引流管放置定义为入院后 8 小时内进行胸腔引流管放置并确认 CXR。

结果

对 568 例筛查出的气胸患者进行了筛选,其中 362 例除 CXR、CUST 和确认性 CT 成像外,还确诊为气胸。该人群中 83%为男性,平均年龄为 45 岁,85%因钝性创伤就诊。CXR 检测气胸的敏感性为 43%,而 CUST 的敏感性为 35%。在排除隐匿性气胸(n = 171)后,CXR 的敏感性为 78%,而 CUST 的敏感性为 65%(p < 0.01)。在该亚组中,CUST 的假阴性率为 36%(n = 62)。在假阴性的 CUST 患者中,50%(n = 31)接受了胸腔引流管放置,其中 85%需要立即放置。

结论

在创伤的初始评估中进行完全创伤超声检查对气胸的检测敏感性低于 CXR,包括需要进行胸腔引流管放置的临床显著气胸。在初始胸部创伤评估中应谨慎考虑将 CUST 作为主要影像学检查手段。

证据水平

诊断性测试研究,IV 级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验