Department of Psychology, Developmental and Health Psychology, University of Konstanz, PO Box 14, 78457 Konstanz, Germany.
Department of Psychology, Sociology & Politics, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield S10 2BP, United Kingdom.
Appetite. 2014 May;76:36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.01.014. Epub 2014 Jan 25.
Compensatory Health Beliefs (CHBs) - beliefs that an unhealthy behaviour can be compensated for by healthy behaviour - are hypothesised to be activated automatically to help people resolve conflicts between their desires (e.g. eat chocolate) and their long-term goals (e.g. dieting). The aim of the present research was to investigate diet-specific CHBs within the context of a theoretical framework, the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA), to examine the extent to which diet-specific CHBs contribute to dieting intentions and dietary intake. Seventy-five dieting women were recruited in Switzerland and England and were asked to complete measures of diet-specific CHBs, risk perception, outcome expectancies, self-efficacy, intention, and behaviour. Path modelling showed that, overall, diet-specific CHBs were not related to dieting intentions (β=.10) or behaviour (β=.06) over and above variables specified in the HAPA. However, risk perception moderated the relationship between diet-specific CHBs and intention (β=.26). Diet-specific CHBs positively predicted intention in women with high risk perception, but not in women with low risk perception. This positive relationship might be explained by the assumption that CHBs play different roles at different stages of the health-behaviour change process. Future studies should further examine moderators and stage-specific differences of the associations between CHBs, intention and health-behaviour change.
补偿性健康信念(CHBs)——即一种信念,认为不健康的行为可以通过健康的行为来弥补——被假设为自动激活,以帮助人们解决他们的欲望(例如吃巧克力)和长期目标(例如节食)之间的冲突。本研究的目的是在健康行动过程方法(HAPA)的理论框架内研究特定于饮食的 CHBs,以检验特定于饮食的 CHBs 对节食意图和饮食摄入的影响程度。在瑞士和英国招募了 75 名节食女性,并要求她们完成特定于饮食的 CHBs、风险感知、结果期望、自我效能、意图和行为的测量。路径建模表明,总体而言,除了 HAPA 中指定的变量外,特定于饮食的 CHBs 与节食意图(β=.10)或行为(β=.06)无关。然而,风险感知调节了特定于饮食的 CHBs 与意图之间的关系(β=.26)。在风险感知较高的女性中,特定于饮食的 CHBs 对意图有积极的预测作用,但在风险感知较低的女性中则没有。这种积极的关系可能可以用这样一种假设来解释,即 CHBs 在健康行为改变过程的不同阶段发挥不同的作用。未来的研究应该进一步研究 CHBs、意图和健康行为改变之间的关联的调节因素和阶段特异性差异。