Universidade de São Paulo.
LUniversidade de São Paulo.
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Nov-Dec;79(6):753-9. doi: 10.5935/1808-8694.20130137.
Today, we are questioning how top-down skills may interfere with performance on auditory processing tests.
To investigate the existence of a possible association between memory, attention and language skills in auditory processing tests in "normal" development children.
Twenty children (ages 7 to 9 years), without complaints related to verbal and/or written language skills; without overt neurological or psychological involvement or delayed psychomotor development. We employed Hearing and auditory Processing Assessment tests in addition to psychophysical tests (visual and auditory attention tests; memory tests for digits and syllables and phonological awareness tests).
there was a "very strong" correlation between Frequency Pattern and Memory for Digits Tests; a "strong" correlations between SSW (LE) test and Memory for Syllables, and SSW (LE) test and phonemic tasks.
the Frequency Pattern Test showed a strong correlation with the phonological working memory skill; just as the SSW had with language and memory skills for syllables. It is noteworthy the difficult to clinically interpret the results of each auditory processing test alone, since these may be dependent on skills not necessarily related to the auditory modality, such as memory and language.
今天,我们质疑自上而下的技能如何干扰听觉处理测试的表现。
研究记忆、注意力和语言技能在“正常”发育儿童听觉处理测试中的可能相关性。
20 名儿童(7 至 9 岁),无与言语和/或书面语言技能相关的投诉;无明显的神经或心理障碍或精神运动发育迟缓。我们除了进行听力和听觉处理评估测试外,还进行了心理物理测试(视觉和听觉注意力测试;数字和音节记忆测试以及语音意识测试)。
频率模式和数字记忆测试之间存在“非常强”的相关性;SSW(左)测试与音节记忆之间存在“强”相关性,SSW(左)测试与语音任务之间存在相关性。
频率模式测试与语音工作记忆技能有很强的相关性;SSW 与语言和音节记忆技能也有很强的相关性。值得注意的是,单独从临床角度解释每个听觉处理测试的结果都很困难,因为这些结果可能依赖于不一定与听觉模式相关的技能,例如记忆和语言。