Suppr超能文献

审视通才专长的实践:一项识别制约因素与解决方案的定性研究。

Examining the practice of generalist expertise: a qualitative study identifying constraints and solutions.

作者信息

Reeve Joanne, Dowrick Christopher F, Freeman George K, Gunn Jane, Mair Frances, May Carl, Mercer Stewart, Palmer Victoria, Howe Amanda, Irving Greg, Shiner Alice, Watson Jessica

机构信息

Department of Health Services Research, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GB, UK.

Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.

出版信息

JRSM Short Rep. 2013 Nov 21;4(12):2042533313510155. doi: 10.1177/2042533313510155. eCollection 2013 Dec.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Provision of person-centred generalist care is a core component of quality primary care systems. The World Health Organisation believes that a lack of generalist primary care is contributing to inefficiency, ineffectiveness and inequity in healthcare. In UK primary care, General Practitioners (GPs) are the largest group of practising generalists. Yet GPs fulfil multiple roles and the pressures of delivering these roles along with wider contextual changes create real challenges to generalist practice. Our study aimed to explore GP perceptions of enablers and constraints for expert generalist care, in order to identify what is needed to ensure health systems are designed to support the generalist role.

DESIGN

Qualitative study in General Practice.

SETTING

UK primary care.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

A qualitative study - interviews, surveys and focus groups with GPs and GP trainees. Data collection and analysis was informed by Normalisation Process Theory.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Qualitative study in General Practice. We conducted interviews, surveys and focus groups with GPs and GP trainees based mainly, but not exclusively, in the UK. Data collection and analysis were informed by Normalization Process Theory.

PARTICIPANTS

UK based GPs (interview and surveys); European GP trainees (focus groups).

RESULTS

Our findings highlight key gaps in current training and service design which may limit development and implementation of expert generalist practice (EGP). These include the lack of a consistent and universal understanding of the distinct expertise of EGP, competing priorities inhibiting the delivery of EGP, lack of the consistent development of skills in interpretive practice and a lack of resources for monitoring EGP.

CONCLUSIONS

WE DESCRIBE FOUR AREAS FOR CHANGE: Translating EGP, Priority setting for EGP, Trusting EGP and Identifying the impact of EGP. We outline proposals for work needed in each area to help enhance the expert generalist role.

摘要

目标

提供以人为本的全科医疗是优质初级医疗体系的核心组成部分。世界卫生组织认为,缺乏全科初级医疗导致了医疗保健的低效、无效和不公平。在英国初级医疗中,全科医生(GPs)是执业全科医生的最大群体。然而,全科医生履行多种职责,履行这些职责的压力以及更广泛的背景变化给全科医疗实践带来了真正的挑战。我们的研究旨在探讨全科医生对专家型全科医疗的促进因素和制约因素的看法,以确定需要什么来确保卫生系统的设计能够支持全科医生的角色。

设计

全科医疗的定性研究。

背景

英国初级医疗。

主要结局指标

一项定性研究——对全科医生和全科医生实习生进行访谈、调查和焦点小组讨论。数据收集和分析以规范化过程理论为依据。

设计与背景

全科医疗的定性研究。我们主要(但不限于)对英国的全科医生和全科医生实习生进行了访谈、调查和焦点小组讨论。数据收集和分析以规范化理论为依据。

参与者

英国的全科医生(访谈和调查);欧洲全科医生实习生(焦点小组)。

结果

我们的研究结果突出了当前培训和服务设计中的关键差距,这些差距可能会限制专家型全科医疗实践(EGP)的发展和实施。这些差距包括对EGP独特专业知识缺乏一致和普遍的理解、相互竞争的优先事项阻碍了EGP的提供、解释性实践技能缺乏持续发展以及缺乏监测EGP的资源。

结论

我们描述了四个变革领域:转化EGP、确定EGP的优先事项、信任EGP以及确定EGP的影响。我们概述了每个领域所需开展的工作建议,以帮助加强专家型全科医生的角色。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97a5/3899736/a2a810837b1c/10.1177_2042533313510155-fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验