From the Department of Clinical Radiology and Reference Center for Mammography, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Gebäude A1, 48149 Muenster, Germany (S.W., W.H., S.B.); Epidemiological Cancer Registry of North Rhine-Westphalia, Muenster, Germany (O.H., H.W.H.); and Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, Medical Faculty of Westfälische Wilhelms University, Muenster, Germany (H.W.H.).
Radiology. 2014 Apr;271(1):38-44. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13131498. Epub 2013 Dec 6.
To determine the relationship between overall detection rates of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and the specific detection rates of low-, intermediate-, and high-grade DCIS at the start of a digital mammography screening program.
The study was approved by the local ethics board and did not require informed consent. Data were included of the first round of digital mammography examinations, performed in 17 screening units in women aged 50-69 years from 2005 to 2008. Grading was provided by the cancer registry for 1018 DCIS cases. The association between the overall cancer detection rate (cases per 100 women screened) and the separate cancer detection rate for invasive cancers and for DCIS was assessed. Likewise, the total DCIS cancer detection rate was separated into rates for low, intermediate, and high grades. Spearman rank correlations were used for analysis.
The overall cancer detection rate correlated with both the cancer detection rate of invasive cancers and the cancer detection rate of DCIS (r = 0.96 and r = 0.88, respectively; P < .001 for both). The cancer detection rate of total DCIS with grading varied among screening units (range, 0.05-0.25), it was borderline not significantly correlated with the cancer detection rate of low-grade DCIS (range, 0.004-0.05; r = 0.49; P = .052), and it showed significant correlations with higher cancer detection rate of intermediate-grade DCIS (range, 0.02-0.12; r = 0.89; P < .001) and of high-grade DCIS (range, 0.03-0.11; r = 0.88; P < .001).
This study demonstrates that high overall cancer detection rates in digital mammography screening are related to high detection rates of invasive cancers, as well as DCIS. Increases in the detection rates of DCIS were not driven by disproportionate increments of the slowly progressive low-grade subtype but rather by increased rates of intermediate- and high-grade subtypes that carry a higher risk of transition to invasive cancers.
在数字乳腺摄影筛查计划开始时,确定导管原位癌(DCIS)的总检出率与低、中和高级别 DCIS 的特定检出率之间的关系。
该研究得到了当地伦理委员会的批准,不需要知情同意。数据包括 2005 年至 2008 年期间在 50-69 岁女性中进行的第一轮数字乳腺摄影检查,涉及 17 个筛查单位。癌症登记处为 1018 例 DCIS 病例提供了分级。评估了总体癌症检出率(每 100 名筛查女性的病例数)与浸润性癌症和 DCIS 单独癌症检出率之间的关联。同样,将总 DCIS 癌症检出率分为低、中、高级别。使用 Spearman 秩相关分析进行分析。
总体癌症检出率与浸润性癌症的癌症检出率和 DCIS 的癌症检出率均相关(r = 0.96 和 r = 0.88;均 P <.001)。分级的总 DCIS 癌症检出率在筛查单位之间存在差异(范围,0.05-0.25),与低级别 DCIS 的癌症检出率(范围,0.004-0.05;r = 0.49;P =.052)无显著相关性,与中级别 DCIS 的较高癌症检出率(范围,0.02-0.12;r = 0.89;P <.001)和高级别 DCIS 的癌症检出率(范围,0.03-0.11;r = 0.88;P <.001)显著相关。
本研究表明,数字乳腺摄影筛查中高总体癌症检出率与浸润性癌症和 DCIS 的高检出率有关。DCIS 检出率的增加不是由进展缓慢的低级别亚型不成比例的增加引起的,而是由中级别和高级别亚型的检出率增加引起的,这些亚型的侵袭性癌症的风险更高。