Suppr超能文献

基于氰基丙烯酸正丁酯的微生物皮肤密封剂预防手术部位感染的有效性

Effectiveness of N-butyl cyanoacrylate-based microbial skin sealant on the prevention of surgical site infections.

作者信息

Ozer Mustafa Tahir, Sinan Huseyin, Saydam Mehmet, Kilic Abdullah, Akyol Mesut, Coskun Ali Kagan, Bedir Orhan, Demibas Sezai

机构信息

1 Department of General Surgery, Gulhane Military Medical Academy , Ankara, Turkey .

出版信息

Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2014 Feb;15(1):14-7. doi: 10.1089/sur.2012.119. Epub 2014 Jan 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are a serious concern in health care, and wound contamination by endogenous skin flora is a major factor in the development of SSIs. Despite preventive tactics in pre-operative skin care, antibiotic prophylaxis, surgical technique, and post-operative incision care, complete sterilization of the skin is not possible. Recently developed microbial skin sealant forms a continuous but breathable barrier that prevents migration of endogenous skin flora into the incision. The skin sealant closes dermal microabrasions, preventing re-colonization of potential pathogens at the incision. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of an N-butyl cyanoacrylate-based microbial skin sealant in reducing the occurrence of SSIs in an experimental rodent model.

METHODS

This was a randomized, controlled animal trial. Forty-eight Wistar albino rats were divided into six groups of eight rats each. Three groups received application of sealant against specific bacteria, and three matched control groups received only the bacteria without the sealant. Group one underwent pre-operative hair removal, followed by application of skin sealant, then abdominal incision and closure. Group two (control) simply underwent hair removal, followed by incision and closure, with no skin sealant applied. Group three received an application of cage swabs (containing a mixture of urine, stool and sawdust from the animals' cages) before application of skin sealant, and group four (control) received cage swabs without subsequent skin sealant. Group five received methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) followed by skin sealant, and group six (control) received MRSA without skin sealant. Seven days after surgery, the animals were sacrificed. Samples were taken from the abdomen of each rat and placed in culture medium. Proliferation of the following bacteria were observed: Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), gram-positive bacilli (GPB), Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and MRSA.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant difference between the median number of GPB in the group that received cage swabs+sealant and the group that received cage swabs without sealant (median, GPB count 29,430 colony-forming units [CFU]/g vs 359,100  colony-forming units [CFU]/g; p<0.05). The study results showed that microbial skin sealant was not as effective in preventing CoNS or MRSA contamination as it was in preventing GPB contamination.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of a microbial skin sealant before surgery can lower the rate of SSIs by reducing the migration of some specific bacterial agents. Additional data are needed to validate its use in clinical practice.

摘要

背景

手术部位感染(SSIs)是医疗保健领域的一个严重问题,内源性皮肤菌群导致的伤口污染是手术部位感染发生的主要因素。尽管在术前皮肤护理、抗生素预防、手术技术和术后切口护理方面采取了预防措施,但皮肤完全灭菌是不可能的。最近开发的微生物皮肤密封剂形成了一个连续但透气的屏障,可防止内源性皮肤菌群迁移到切口处。该皮肤密封剂可封闭皮肤微擦伤,防止潜在病原体在切口处重新定植。本研究的目的是确定一种基于氰基丙烯酸正丁酯的微生物皮肤密封剂在降低实验性啮齿动物模型中手术部位感染发生率方面的效果。

方法

这是一项随机对照动物试验。48只Wistar白化大鼠被分为六组,每组8只。三组接受针对特定细菌的密封剂应用,三个匹配的对照组仅接受细菌而不使用密封剂。第一组在术前进行脱毛,然后涂抹皮肤密封剂,接着进行腹部切口和缝合。第二组(对照组)仅进行脱毛,然后进行切口和缝合,不涂抹皮肤密封剂。第三组在涂抹皮肤密封剂前接受笼拭子(含有动物笼中的尿液、粪便和锯末混合物)涂抹,第四组(对照组)接受笼拭子但随后不涂抹皮肤密封剂。第五组接受耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)感染,然后涂抹皮肤密封剂,第六组(对照组)接受MRSA感染但不涂抹皮肤密封剂。术后7天,处死动物。从每只大鼠的腹部采集样本并置于培养基中。观察以下细菌的增殖情况:凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(CoNS)、革兰氏阳性杆菌(GPB)、铜绿假单胞菌和MRSA。

结果

接受笼拭子+密封剂组的GPB中位数与接受笼拭子但无密封剂组之间存在统计学显著差异(中位数,GPB计数29,430菌落形成单位[CFU]/克对359,100菌落形成单位[CFU]/克;p<0.05)。研究结果表明,微生物皮肤密封剂在预防CoNS或MRSA污染方面不如预防GPB污染有效。

结论

术前使用微生物皮肤密封剂可通过减少某些特定细菌病原体的迁移来降低手术部位感染的发生率。需要更多数据来验证其在临床实践中的应用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验