Suppr超能文献

胃炎分期:OLGA 和 OLGIM 系统的观察者间一致性。

Gastritis staging: interobserver agreement by applying OLGA and OLGIM systems.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, University of Latvia, 1a Sarlotes str, Riga, 1001, Latvia,

出版信息

Virchows Arch. 2014 Apr;464(4):403-7. doi: 10.1007/s00428-014-1544-3. Epub 2014 Jan 30.

Abstract

Atrophic gastritis remains a difficult histopathological diagnosis with low interobserver agreement. The aim of our study was to compare gastritis staging and interobserver agreement between general and expert gastrointestinal (GI) pathologists using Operative Link for Gastritis Assessment (OLGA) and Operative Link on Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia (OLGIM). We enrolled 835 patients undergoing upper endoscopy in the study. Two general and two expert gastrointestinal pathologists graded biopsy specimens according to the Sydney classification, and the stage of gastritis was assessed by OLGA and OLGIM system. Using OLGA, 280 (33.4 %) patients had gastritis (stage I-IV), whereas with OLGIM this was 167 (19.9 %). OLGA stage III- IV gastritis was observed in 25 patients, whereas by OLGIM stage III-IV was found in 23 patients. Interobserver agreement between expert GI pathologists for atrophy in the antrum, incisura angularis, and corpus was moderate (kappa = 0.53, 0.57 and 0.41, respectively, p < 0.0001), but almost perfect for intestinal metaplasia (kappa = 0.82, 0.80 and 0.81, respectively, p < 0.0001). However, interobserver agreement between general pathologists was poor for atrophy, but moderate for intestinal metaplasia. OLGIM staging provided the highest interobserver agreement, but a substantial proportion of potentially high-risk individuals would be missed if only OLGIM staging is applied. Therefore, we recommend to use a combination of OLGA and OLGIM for staging of chronic gastritis.

摘要

萎缩性胃炎仍然是一种难以进行组织病理学诊断的疾病,观察者间的一致性较低。本研究的目的是比较普通和专家胃肠病学家使用胃炎评估操作链接(OLGA)和胃肠上皮化生操作链接(OLGIM)在胃炎分期和观察者间一致性方面的差异。我们纳入了 835 名接受上消化道内镜检查的患者。两名普通和两名专家胃肠病学家根据悉尼分类对活检标本进行分级,并使用 OLGA 和 OLGIM 系统评估胃炎分期。使用 OLGA,280 例(33.4%)患者患有胃炎(I-IV 期),而使用 OLGIM 则有 167 例(19.9%)。OLGA 分期 III-IV 期胃炎在 25 例患者中观察到,而 OLGIM 分期 III-IV 期在 23 例患者中观察到。专家胃肠病学家对胃窦、角切迹和胃体萎缩的观察间一致性为中度(kappa 值分别为 0.53、0.57 和 0.41,均 p<0.0001),但对肠上皮化生的观察间一致性几乎为完美(kappa 值分别为 0.82、0.80 和 0.81,均 p<0.0001)。然而,普通病理学家之间对萎缩的观察间一致性较差,但对肠上皮化生的观察间一致性为中度。OLGIM 分期提供了最高的观察者间一致性,但如果仅应用 OLGIM 分期,则会错过相当一部分高风险个体。因此,我们建议使用 OLGA 和 OLGIM 相结合来分期慢性胃炎。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验