Hendricks Julie L, Marshall Teresa A, Harless Jeffrey D, Hogan Mary M, Qian Fang, Wefel James S
Department of Preventive & Community Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, N335 Dental Science Building, Iowa City, IA 52340, USA.
Dows Institute for Dental Research, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52340, USA.
Am J Dent. 2013 Oct;26(5):278-82.
To measure the pH, titratable acidity, fluoride concentration and erosive potential of brewed teas.
Bag teas were purchased to represent black, green, citrus, fruity, and floral tea flavors from Tulsi, Bigelow, HyVee, Tazo, and Yogi brands and brewed (1 bag/240 ml) in boiling water for 3 minutes. The pH, titratable acidity, and fluoride concentrations were measured. Following these measurements, a representative tea from each flavor was selected for investigation of erosion potential. Six extracted human molars were randomly assigned to each tea. Teeth were painted with fingernail polish to expose a 1 x 4 mm window and then soaked in tea for a total of 25 hours with teas refreshed every 5 hours. Teeth were then sectioned using a microtome and photographed using a polarized light microscope. Lesion depths (i.e., eroded surfaces) were measured using Image Pro Plus software. Differences in physiochemical properties and lesion depths between beverages were investigated using one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey's HSD test. Relationships among lesion depths and physiochemical properties were evaluated using the Pearson correlation test.
pH, titratable acidity and fluoride concentrations differed between tea flavors (P < 0.05) and between brands (P < 0.05). Lesion depths produced by the citrus tea (83.1 +/- 10.3 microm) were greater than those produced by the fruity tea (56.5 +/- 6.1 microm); both teas produced greater depths than black (30.1 +/- 7.4 microm), floral (25.0 +/- 3.2 microm) or green (22.3 +/- 6.3 microm) teas (P < 0.05). pH (r = -0.96; P = 0.009) was inversely and titratable acidity (r = 0.97; P = 0.006) was positively associated with lesion depths.
测定冲泡茶的pH值、可滴定酸度、氟化物浓度及侵蚀潜力。
购买袋装茶以代表来自图尔西、比奇洛、海威、泰舒和悠季等品牌的红茶、绿茶、柑橘味茶、果味茶和花香茶,并在沸水中冲泡(1袋/240毫升)3分钟。测量pH值、可滴定酸度和氟化物浓度。在这些测量之后,从每种口味中选择一种代表性的茶来研究侵蚀潜力。将六颗拔除的人类磨牙随机分配到每种茶中。用指甲油涂抹牙齿以露出1×4毫米的窗口,然后浸泡在茶中总共25小时,每5小时更换一次茶。然后用切片机对牙齿进行切片,并用偏光显微镜拍照。使用Image Pro Plus软件测量病变深度(即侵蚀表面)。使用单因素方差分析和事后的Tukey's HSD检验研究饮料之间理化性质和病变深度的差异。使用Pearson相关检验评估病变深度与理化性质之间的关系。
茶的口味之间(P<0.05)以及品牌之间(P<0.05)pH值、可滴定酸度和氟化物浓度存在差异。柑橘味茶产生的病变深度(83.1±10.3微米)大于果味茶(56.5±6.1微米);这两种茶产生的深度均大于红茶(30.1±7.4微米)、花香茶(25.0±3.2微米)或绿茶(22.3±6.3微米)(P<0.05)。pH值(r = -0.96;P = 0.009)与病变深度呈负相关,可滴定酸度(r = 0.97;P = 0.006)与病变深度呈正相关。