Suppr超能文献

放化疗联合辅助手术可显著改善食管腺癌和鳞癌患者的生存预后。

Chemoradiotherapy, with adjuvant surgery for local control, confers a durable survival advantage in adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus.

机构信息

Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Department of Surgery, Connolly Hospital, Dublin 15, Ireland.

Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Department of Surgery, Connolly Hospital, Dublin 15, Ireland.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer. 2014 Apr;50(6):1065-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.12.022. Epub 2014 Jan 27.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Oesophageal cancer usually presents with systemic disease, necessitating systemic therapy. Neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy improves short-term survival, but its long-term impact is disputed because of limited accrual, treatment-protocol heterogeneity and a short follow-up of randomised trials.

AIMS

Long-term results of two simultaneous randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing neo-adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy and surgery (MMT) with surgical monotherapy were examined, and the response of adenocarcinoma (AC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) to identical regimens compared.

METHODS

Between 1990 and 1997, two RCTs were undertaken on 211 patients. Patients with AC (n=113) or SCC (n=98) were separately-randomised to identical protocols of MMT or surgical monotherapy.

RESULTS

211 patients were followed to 206 months; 104 patients were randomised to MMT (58 AC and 46 SCC, respectively) and 107 to surgery. MMT provided a significant survival-advantage over surgical monotherapy for AC (P=0.004), SCC (P=0.01). There was a 54% relative risk-reduction in lymph-node metastasis following MMT, compared with surgery (64% versus 29%, P<0.001). MMT produced a pathologic complete response (pCR) in 25% and 31% of AC and SCC, respectively. Survival advantage accrued to MMT, pCR and node-negative patients: AC pCR versus surgical monotherapy (P=0.001); residual disease following MMT versus surgical monotherapy (P=0.008); SCC pCR versus surgical monotherapy (P=0.033).

CONCLUSIONS

A survival advantage for MMT persisted long-term in AC and was replicated in SCC. MMT produced loco-regional tumour down-staging to extinction in 25-31% of patients, potentially permitting personalised treatment in this cohort that avoids the morbidity and mortality associated with resection. Node-negative patients with residual localised disease following MMT had a survival advantage over node-negative patients following surgery alone, supporting a systemic effect on micro-metastatic disease.

摘要

引言

食管癌通常表现为全身性疾病,需要进行全身治疗。新辅助放化疗可改善短期生存率,但由于入组人数有限、治疗方案异质性以及随机试验随访时间较短,其长期影响存在争议。

目的

检查了两项比较新辅助化疗和放疗联合手术(MMT)与单纯手术治疗的同时进行的随机对照试验(RCT)的长期结果,并比较了腺癌(AC)和鳞状细胞癌(SCC)对相同方案的反应。

方法

1990 年至 1997 年间,对 211 例患者进行了两项 RCT。将 AC(n=113)或 SCC(n=98)患者分别随机分为接受相同 MMT 或单纯手术治疗的方案。

结果

211 例患者随访至 206 个月;104 例患者被随机分配至 MMT(分别为 58 例 AC 和 46 例 SCC),107 例患者接受手术治疗。与单纯手术治疗相比,MMT 为 AC(P=0.004)和 SCC(P=0.01)提供了显著的生存优势。与手术相比,MMT 使淋巴结转移的相对风险降低了 54%(64%与 29%,P<0.001)。MMT 使 25%和 31%的 AC 和 SCC 患者产生了病理完全缓解(pCR)。MMT、pCR 和淋巴结阴性患者的生存优势累积:AC pCR 与单纯手术治疗相比(P=0.001);MMT 后残留疾病与单纯手术治疗相比(P=0.008);SCC pCR 与单纯手术治疗相比(P=0.033)。

结论

在 AC 中,MMT 的生存优势长期存在,并在 SCC 中得到复制。MMT 使 25-31%的患者局部肿瘤降期至消失,可能使这部分患者避免与切除相关的发病率和死亡率,并进行个体化治疗。MMT 后淋巴结阴性且局部残留疾病的患者的生存优势优于单纯手术治疗后的淋巴结阴性患者,支持全身治疗对微转移疾病的影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验