Roberts Devender, Neilson James P, Kilby Mark D, Gates Simon
Obstetrics Directorate, Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Crown Street, Liverpool, Merseyside, UK, L8 7SS.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 30;2014(1):CD002073. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002073.pub3.
Twin-twin transfusion syndrome, a condition affecting monochorionic twin pregnancies, is associated with a high risk of perinatal mortality and morbidity. A number of treatments have been introduced to treat the condition but it is unclear which intervention improves maternal and fetal outcome.
The objective of this review was to evaluate the impact of treatment modalities in twin-twin transfusion syndrome.
We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 May 2013).
Randomised and quasi-randomised studies of amnioreduction versus laser coagulation, septostomy versus laser coagulation or septostomy versus amnioreduction.
Two review authors independently assessed eligibility and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information.
Three studies (253 women and 506 babies) were included. All three trials were judged to be of moderate quality. One study compared amnioreduction with septostomy (71 women), whilst the other two studies compared amnioreduction with endoscopic laser coagulation (182 women). Not all trials provided outcome data that could be included in all meta-analyses. Amnioreduction compared with laser coagulation Although there was no difference in overall death between amnioreduction and laser coagulation (average risk ratio (RR) 0.87; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55 to 1.38 adjusted for clustering, two trials) or death of at least one infant per pregnancy (RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.75 to 1.09, two trials), or death of both infants per pregnancy (average RR 0.76; 95% 0.27 to 2.10, two trials), more babies were alive without neurological abnormality at the age of six years in the laser group than in the amnioreduction groups (RR 1.57; 95% CI 1.05 to 2.34 adjusted for clustering, one trial). There were no significant differences in the babies alive at six years with major neurological abnormality treated by laser coagulation or amnioreduction (RR 0.97; 95% CI 0.34 to 2.77 adjusted for clustering, one trial). Outcomes for death in this 2013 update are different from the previous 2008 update, where improvements in perinatal death and death of both infants per pregnancy were shown in the laser intervention arm. The NIHCD trial included in this update exerts an opposite direction of effects to the Eurofetus study, which was previously the only included laser study, hence the difference in outcome. Amnioreduction compared with septostomy There are no differences in overall death (RR 0.83; 95% CI 0.47 to 1.47, adjusted for clustering, one trial), death of at least one infant per pregnancy (RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.48 to 1.35, one trial), or death of both infants per pregnancy (RR 0.90; 95% CI 0.37 to 2.22, one trial) or gestational age at birth (RR 1.20; 95% CI -0.81 to 3.21, one trial) between amnioreduction and septostomy.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic laser coagulation of anastomotic vessels should continue to be considered in the treatment of all stages of twin-twin transfusion syndrome to improve neurodevelopmental outcomes.Further research targeted towards assessing the effect of treatment on milder (Quintero stage 1 and 2) and more severe (Quintero stage 4) forms of twin-twin transfusion syndrome is required. Studies should aim to assess long-term outcomes of survivors.
双胎输血综合征是一种影响单绒毛膜双胎妊娠的疾病,与围产期高死亡率和发病率相关。已经引入了多种治疗方法来治疗该疾病,但尚不清楚哪种干预措施能改善母婴结局。
本综述的目的是评估双胎输血综合征治疗方式的影响。
我们检索了Cochrane妊娠与分娩组试验注册库(2013年5月31日)。
羊膜腔穿刺减压术与激光凝固术、隔膜造口术与激光凝固术或隔膜造口术与羊膜腔穿刺减压术的随机和半随机研究。
两位综述作者独立评估纳入标准并提取数据。我们联系研究作者以获取更多信息。
纳入了三项研究(253名女性和506名婴儿)。所有三项试验均被判定为中等质量。一项研究比较了羊膜腔穿刺减压术与隔膜造口术(71名女性),而另外两项研究比较了羊膜腔穿刺减压术与内镜激光凝固术(182名女性)。并非所有试验都提供了可纳入所有荟萃分析的结局数据。
虽然羊膜腔穿刺减压术与激光凝固术在总体死亡方面无差异(平均风险比(RR)0.87;95%置信区间(CI)0.55至1.38,针对聚类进行调整,两项试验),或每例妊娠至少一名婴儿死亡(RR 0.91;95% CI 0.75至1.09,两项试验),或每例妊娠两名婴儿死亡(平均RR 0.76;95% 0.27至2.10,两项试验),但激光组中6岁时无神经异常存活的婴儿比羊膜腔穿刺减压术组更多(RR 1.57;95% CI 1.05至2.34,针对聚类进行调整,一项试验)。激光凝固术或羊膜腔穿刺减压术治疗的6岁时患有严重神经异常且存活的婴儿之间无显著差异(RR 0.97;95% CI 0.34至2.77,针对聚类进行调整,一项试验)。2013年更新版中死亡结局与2008年之前的更新版不同,之前的更新版显示激光干预组围产期死亡和每例妊娠两名婴儿死亡有所改善。本次更新纳入的NIHCD试验与之前唯一纳入的激光研究Eurofetus研究的效应方向相反,因此结局有所不同。
在总体死亡(RR 0.83;95% CI 0.47至1.47,针对聚类进行调整,一项试验)、每例妊娠至少一名婴儿死亡(RR 0.80;95% CI 0.48至1.35,一项试验)、每例妊娠两名婴儿死亡(RR 0.90;95% CI 0.37至2.22,一项试验)或出生时孕周(RR 1.20;95% CI -0.81至3.21,一项试验)方面,羊膜腔穿刺减压术与隔膜造口术之间无差异。
在双胎输血综合征各阶段的治疗中,应继续考虑对吻合血管进行内镜激光凝固术以改善神经发育结局。需要针对评估治疗对较轻(昆特罗1期和2期)和较重(昆特罗4期)形式的双胎输血综合征的效果开展进一步研究。研究应旨在评估幸存者的长期结局。