• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双胎输血综合征的治疗干预措施。

Interventions for the treatment of twin-twin transfusion syndrome.

作者信息

Roberts Devender, Neilson James P, Kilby Mark D, Gates Simon

机构信息

Obstetrics Directorate, Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Crown Street, Liverpool, Merseyside, UK, L8 7SS.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 30;2014(1):CD002073. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002073.pub3.

DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD002073.pub3
PMID:24482008
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10816955/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Twin-twin transfusion syndrome, a condition affecting monochorionic twin pregnancies, is associated with a high risk of perinatal mortality and morbidity. A number of treatments have been introduced to treat the condition but it is unclear which intervention improves maternal and fetal outcome.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to evaluate the impact of treatment modalities in twin-twin transfusion syndrome.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 May 2013).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised studies of amnioreduction versus laser coagulation, septostomy versus laser coagulation or septostomy versus amnioreduction.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed eligibility and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information.

MAIN RESULTS

Three studies (253 women and 506 babies) were included. All three trials were judged to be of moderate quality. One study compared amnioreduction with septostomy (71 women), whilst the other two studies compared amnioreduction with endoscopic laser coagulation (182 women). Not all trials provided outcome data that could be included in all meta-analyses. Amnioreduction compared with laser coagulation Although there was no difference in overall death between amnioreduction and laser coagulation (average risk ratio (RR) 0.87; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55 to 1.38 adjusted for clustering, two trials) or death of at least one infant per pregnancy (RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.75 to 1.09, two trials), or death of both infants per pregnancy (average RR 0.76; 95% 0.27 to 2.10, two trials), more babies were alive without neurological abnormality at the age of six years in the laser group than in the amnioreduction groups (RR 1.57; 95% CI 1.05 to 2.34 adjusted for clustering, one trial). There were no significant differences in the babies alive at six years with major neurological abnormality treated by laser coagulation or amnioreduction (RR 0.97; 95% CI 0.34 to 2.77 adjusted for clustering, one trial). Outcomes for death in this 2013 update are different from the previous 2008 update, where improvements in perinatal death and death of both infants per pregnancy were shown in the laser intervention arm. The NIHCD trial included in this update exerts an opposite direction of effects to the Eurofetus study, which was previously the only included laser study, hence the difference in outcome. Amnioreduction compared with septostomy There are no differences in overall death (RR 0.83; 95% CI 0.47 to 1.47, adjusted for clustering, one trial), death of at least one infant per pregnancy (RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.48 to 1.35, one trial), or death of both infants per pregnancy (RR 0.90; 95% CI 0.37 to 2.22, one trial) or gestational age at birth (RR 1.20; 95% CI -0.81 to 3.21, one trial) between amnioreduction and septostomy.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic laser coagulation of anastomotic vessels should continue to be considered in the treatment of all stages of twin-twin transfusion syndrome to improve neurodevelopmental outcomes.Further research targeted towards assessing the effect of treatment on milder (Quintero stage 1 and 2) and more severe (Quintero stage 4) forms of twin-twin transfusion syndrome is required. Studies should aim to assess long-term outcomes of survivors.

摘要

背景

双胎输血综合征是一种影响单绒毛膜双胎妊娠的疾病,与围产期高死亡率和发病率相关。已经引入了多种治疗方法来治疗该疾病,但尚不清楚哪种干预措施能改善母婴结局。

目的

本综述的目的是评估双胎输血综合征治疗方式的影响。

检索方法

我们检索了Cochrane妊娠与分娩组试验注册库(2013年5月31日)。

选择标准

羊膜腔穿刺减压术与激光凝固术、隔膜造口术与激光凝固术或隔膜造口术与羊膜腔穿刺减压术的随机和半随机研究。

数据收集与分析

两位综述作者独立评估纳入标准并提取数据。我们联系研究作者以获取更多信息。

主要结果

纳入了三项研究(253名女性和506名婴儿)。所有三项试验均被判定为中等质量。一项研究比较了羊膜腔穿刺减压术与隔膜造口术(71名女性),而另外两项研究比较了羊膜腔穿刺减压术与内镜激光凝固术(182名女性)。并非所有试验都提供了可纳入所有荟萃分析的结局数据。

羊膜腔穿刺减压术与激光凝固术比较

虽然羊膜腔穿刺减压术与激光凝固术在总体死亡方面无差异(平均风险比(RR)0.87;95%置信区间(CI)0.55至1.38,针对聚类进行调整,两项试验),或每例妊娠至少一名婴儿死亡(RR 0.91;95% CI 0.75至1.09,两项试验),或每例妊娠两名婴儿死亡(平均RR 0.76;95% 0.27至2.10,两项试验),但激光组中6岁时无神经异常存活的婴儿比羊膜腔穿刺减压术组更多(RR 1.57;95% CI 1.05至2.34,针对聚类进行调整,一项试验)。激光凝固术或羊膜腔穿刺减压术治疗的6岁时患有严重神经异常且存活的婴儿之间无显著差异(RR 0.97;95% CI 0.34至2.77,针对聚类进行调整,一项试验)。2013年更新版中死亡结局与2008年之前的更新版不同,之前的更新版显示激光干预组围产期死亡和每例妊娠两名婴儿死亡有所改善。本次更新纳入的NIHCD试验与之前唯一纳入的激光研究Eurofetus研究的效应方向相反,因此结局有所不同。

羊膜腔穿刺减压术与隔膜造口术比较

在总体死亡(RR 0.83;95% CI 0.47至1.47,针对聚类进行调整,一项试验)、每例妊娠至少一名婴儿死亡(RR 0.80;95% CI 0.48至1.35,一项试验)、每例妊娠两名婴儿死亡(RR 0.90;95% CI 0.37至2.22,一项试验)或出生时孕周(RR 1.20;95% CI -0.81至3.21,一项试验)方面,羊膜腔穿刺减压术与隔膜造口术之间无差异。

作者结论

在双胎输血综合征各阶段的治疗中,应继续考虑对吻合血管进行内镜激光凝固术以改善神经发育结局。需要针对评估治疗对较轻(昆特罗1期和2期)和较重(昆特罗4期)形式的双胎输血综合征的效果开展进一步研究。研究应旨在评估幸存者的长期结局。

相似文献

1
Interventions for the treatment of twin-twin transfusion syndrome.双胎输血综合征的治疗干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 30;2014(1):CD002073. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002073.pub3.
2
Interventions for the treatment of twin-twin transfusion syndrome.双胎输血综合征的治疗干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23(1):CD002073. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002073.pub2.
3
Prenatal interventions for congenital diaphragmatic hernia for improving outcomes.用于改善先天性膈疝预后的产前干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 27;2015(11):CD008925. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008925.pub2.
4
Different corticosteroids and regimens for accelerating fetal lung maturation for babies at risk of preterm birth.不同的皮质类固醇药物和方案用于加速有早产风险的婴儿的胎儿肺成熟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 9;8(8):CD006764. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006764.pub4.
5
Use of biochemical tests of placental function for improving pregnancy outcome.利用胎盘功能生化检测改善妊娠结局。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 25;2015(11):CD011202. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011202.pub2.
6
Immediate versus deferred delivery of the preterm baby with suspected fetal compromise for improving outcomes.对于疑似有胎儿窘迫的早产婴儿,立即分娩与延迟分娩以改善结局的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 12;7(7):CD008968. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008968.pub3.
7
Planned caesarean section for women with a twin pregnancy.双胎妊娠妇女的计划性剖宫产。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 19;2015(12):CD006553. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006553.pub3.
8
Prenatal administration of progestogens for preventing spontaneous preterm birth in women with a multiple pregnancy.孕激素产前给药预防多胎妊娠妇女自发性早产。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Nov 20;2019(11):CD012024. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012024.pub3.
9
Planned early delivery versus expectant management of the term suspected compromised baby for improving outcomes.计划早期分娩与对足月疑似胎儿窘迫的婴儿进行期待管理以改善结局。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 24;2015(11):CD009433. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009433.pub2.
10
Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well-being.分娩时对胎儿心率进行间歇性听诊以评估胎儿健康状况。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 13;2(2):CD008680. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008680.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy.国际妇产科超声学会(ISUOG)实践指南(更新版):超声在双胎妊娠中的作用
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Feb;65(2):253-276. doi: 10.1002/uog.29166. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
2
Fetal growth changes and prediction of selective fetal growth restriction following fetoscopic laser coagulation in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome.双胎输血综合征胎儿镜激光凝固术后胎儿生长变化及选择性胎儿生长受限的预测
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2023 Nov;66(6):529-536. doi: 10.5468/ogs.23108. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
3
Two Year Neurodevelopmental Outcome after Fetoscopic Laser Therapy for Twin-Twin Transfusion Syndrome: Comparison with Uncomplicated Monochorionic Diamniotic Twins.胎儿镜激光治疗双胎输血综合征后的两年神经发育结局:与无并发症的单绒毛膜双羊膜囊双胎的比较。
Children (Basel). 2023 Jul 20;10(7):1250. doi: 10.3390/children10071250.
4
Effect of Gestational Age at Fetoscopic Laser Photocoagulation on Perinatal Outcomes for Patients with Twin-Twin Transfusion Syndrome.胎儿镜激光凝固术时的孕周对双胎输血综合征患者围产期结局的影响。
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 28;12(5):1900. doi: 10.3390/jcm12051900.
5
Correction of fetal umbilical vein flow imbalance following laser surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome.纠正双胎输血综合征激光手术后胎儿脐静脉血流失衡。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Dec;60(6):774-779. doi: 10.1002/uog.26041.
6
Clinical Value and Treatment Progress of Prenatal Ultrasonography in Twin Pregnancy: A Systematic Review.产前超声检查在双胎妊娠中的临床价值及治疗进展:系统评价。
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2022 Aug 22;2022:6748487. doi: 10.1155/2022/6748487. eCollection 2022.
7
Effect of Fetoscopic Laser Photocoagulation on Fetal Growth and Placental Perfusion in Twin-Twin Transfusion Syndrome.胎儿镜激光凝固术对双胎输血综合征中胎儿生长及胎盘灌注的影响
J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 28;11(15):4404. doi: 10.3390/jcm11154404.
8
Controlled amnioreduction for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome.双胎输血综合征的控制性羊水减量术
Ther Adv Reprod Health. 2022 Mar 29;16:26334941221080727. doi: 10.1177/26334941221080727. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
9
Developments in functional imaging of the placenta.胎盘功能影像学的进展。
Br J Radiol. 2023 Jul;96(1147):20211010. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20211010. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
10
Safety of neuraxial anesthesia in patients twin pregnancy and twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome taken to laser photocoagulation. Retrospective cohort study.神经轴麻醉在接受激光光凝治疗的双胎妊娠和双胎输血综合征患者中的安全性。回顾性队列研究。
Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 2021 Sep 30;72(3):258-270. doi: 10.18597/rcog.3644.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term developmental follow-up of infants who participated in a randomized clinical trial of amniocentesis vs laser photocoagulation for the treatment of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome.对接受羊膜腔穿刺术与激光光凝治疗双胎输血综合征随机临床试验的婴儿进行的长期发育随访。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Nov;203(5):444.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.08.054.
2
The con trial.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Mar;200(3):e14-5; author reply e15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.07.041. Epub 2008 Nov 6.
3
Interventions for twin-twin transfusion syndrome: a Cochrane review.双胎输血综合征的干预措施:一项Cochrane系统评价
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jun;31(6):701-11. doi: 10.1002/uog.5328.
4
Power and interpretation of a randomized study on the treatment of severe twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 May;198(5):607; author reply 607-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.01.016.
5
Interventions for the treatment of twin-twin transfusion syndrome.双胎输血综合征的治疗干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23(1):CD002073. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002073.pub2.
6
A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial of amnioreduction vs selective fetoscopic laser photocoagulation for the treatment of severe twin-twin transfusion syndrome.一项关于羊水减量术与选择性胎儿镜激光凝固术治疗重度双胎输血综合征的前瞻性、随机、多中心试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Oct;197(4):396.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.07.020.
7
A randomized trial of amnioreduction versus septostomy in the treatment of twin-twin transfusion syndrome.羊膜腔减量术与隔膜造口术治疗双胎输血综合征的随机试验
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Sep;193(3 Pt 1):701-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.01.067.
8
Stopping clinical trials early.提前终止临床试验。
BMJ. 2004 Sep 4;329(7465):525-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7465.525.
9
Endoscopic laser surgery versus serial amnioreduction for severe twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome.内镜激光手术与连续羊水减量术治疗重度双胎输血综合征的对比
N Engl J Med. 2004 Jul 8;351(2):136-44. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032597. Epub 2004 Jul 6.
10
How should randomised trials including multiple pregnancies be analysed?包括多胎妊娠的随机试验应如何进行分析?
BJOG. 2004 Mar;111(3):213-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00059.x.