• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双胎输血综合征胎儿镜激光凝固术后胎儿生长变化及选择性胎儿生长受限的预测

Fetal growth changes and prediction of selective fetal growth restriction following fetoscopic laser coagulation in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome.

作者信息

Kim So Yeon, Won Hye-Sung, Lee Mi-Young, Chung Jin Hoon, Park Jin-Hee, Kim You-Kyoung, Lee Hwang-Mi

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2023 Nov;66(6):529-536. doi: 10.5468/ogs.23108. Epub 2023 Oct 13.

DOI:10.5468/ogs.23108
PMID:37828841
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10663392/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate fetal growth changes and predictive factors for selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) in patients with twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) after fetoscopic laser coagulation (FLC).

METHODS

This retrospective study included twin-pregnant women with fetal TTTS who underwent FLC at our institution between 2011 and 2020. Twin pairs who survived at least 28 days after FLC and at least 28 days after birth were included. A paired t-test was used to compare the mean discordance between the estimated fetal weights at the FLC and the birth weights. The predictive factors for sFGR after FLC were evaluated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 119 eligible pairs of patients who underwent FLC were analyzed. The weight percentile at birth significantly decreased after FLC in the recipients (53.7±30.4 percentile vs. 43.7±28.0 percentile; P<0.001), but increased in the donors (11.5±17.1 percentile vs. 20.7±22.8 percentile; P<0.001). Additionally, the mean weight discordance of twin pairs significantly decreased after FLC (23.9%±12.7% vs. 17.3%±15.7%; P<0.001). After FLC, Quintero stage ≥3, pre-FLC sFGR, abnormal cord insertion, and post-FLC abnormal umbilical artery Doppler (UAD) were all significantly higher in the sFGR group than the non-sFGR group. The prediction model using these variables indicated that the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.898.

CONCLUSION

The recipient weight percentile decreased, whereas donor growth increased, resulting in reduced weight discordance after FLC. The Quintero stage, pre-FLC sFGR, and post-FLC abnormal UAD were useful predictors of sFGR after FLC in TTTS.

摘要

目的

探讨胎儿镜激光凝固术(FLC)治疗双胎输血综合征(TTTS)后选择性胎儿生长受限(sFGR)的胎儿生长变化及预测因素。

方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了2011年至2020年在我院接受FLC治疗的TTTS双胎孕妇。纳入至少在FLC后存活28天且出生后至少存活28天的双胎。采用配对t检验比较FLC时估计胎儿体重与出生体重之间的平均不一致性。使用单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析评估FLC后sFGR的预测因素。

结果

共分析了119对接受FLC的符合条件的患者。受血儿出生时的体重百分位数在FLC后显著下降(53.7±30.4百分位数 vs. 43.7±28.0百分位数;P<0.001),但供血儿体重百分位数增加(11.5±17.1百分位数 vs. 20.7±22.8百分位数;P<0.001)。此外,双胎的平均体重不一致性在FLC后显著降低(23.9%±12.7% vs. 17.3%±15.7%;P<0.001)。FLC后,sFGR组的Quintero分期≥3、FLC前sFGR、脐带插入异常和FLC后脐动脉多普勒(UAD)异常均显著高于非sFGR组。使用这些变量的预测模型显示,受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.898。

结论

FLC后受血儿体重百分位数下降,供血儿生长增加,导致体重不一致性降低。Quintero分期、FLC前sFGR和FLC后UAD异常是TTTS患者FLC后sFGR的有用预测指标。

相似文献

1
Fetal growth changes and prediction of selective fetal growth restriction following fetoscopic laser coagulation in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome.双胎输血综合征胎儿镜激光凝固术后胎儿生长变化及选择性胎儿生长受限的预测
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2023 Nov;66(6):529-536. doi: 10.5468/ogs.23108. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
2
Prediction of post-laser fetal death in selective growth restriction complicating twin-twin transfusion syndrome using standardized definitions.使用标准化定义预测双胎输血综合征合并选择性生长受限的激光治疗后胎儿死亡情况。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Nov;58(5):738-743. doi: 10.1002/uog.23519. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
3
Perinatal outcomes and factors affecting the survival rate of fetuses with twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome treated with fetoscopic laser coagulation: a single-center seven-year experience.双胎输血综合征胎儿行胎儿镜激光凝固术治疗的围产结局及生存率影响因素:单中心 7 年经验
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(25):5595-5606. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1888286. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
4
Twin-Twin Transfusion Syndrome with and without Selective Fetal Growth Restriction Prior to Fetoscopic Laser Surgery: Short and Long-Term Outcome.胎儿镜激光手术前伴有或不伴有选择性胎儿生长受限的双胎输血综合征:短期和长期结局
J Clin Med. 2019 Jul 3;8(7):969. doi: 10.3390/jcm8070969.
5
Twin twin transfusion syndrome with and without selective fetal growth restriction: Predictors of donor demise.双胎输血综合征伴或不伴选择性胎儿生长受限:供体死亡的预测因素。
Prenat Diagn. 2021 Nov;41(12):1524-1530. doi: 10.1002/pd.6049. Epub 2021 Oct 17.
6
Single fetal demise following fetoscopic ablation for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome-cohort study, systematic review, and meta-analysis.双胎输血综合征胎儿镜消融术后单胎死亡——队列研究、系统评价和荟萃分析
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jun;226(6):843.e1-843.e28. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.02.035. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
7
Early- and late-onset selective fetal growth restriction in monochorionic twin pregnancy with expectant management.单绒毛膜性双胎妊娠期待治疗的早发型和晚发型选择性胎儿生长受限。
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2022 Apr;51(4):102314. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2022.102314. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
8
Impact of Selective Fetal Growth Restriction on Laser Therapy Outcomes in Twin-Twin Transfusion Syndrome.选择性胎儿生长受限对双胎输血综合征激光治疗结局的影响。
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2023;50(1):47-53. doi: 10.1159/000528774. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
9
Risk of donor demise after laser therapy for twin-twin transfusion when complicated by growth discordance and abnormal umbilical artery Doppler findings.当双胎输血综合征合并生长不一致及脐动脉多普勒检查结果异常时,激光治疗后供体胎儿死亡的风险。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Apr;32(8):1332-1336. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1404983. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
10
Significance of placental cord insertion site in twin pregnancy.胎盘脐带插入部位在双胎妊娠中的意义。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Sep;52(3):378-384. doi: 10.1002/uog.18914.

本文引用的文献

1
Pregnancy outcomes in twin pregnancies over 10 years.10年间双胎妊娠的妊娠结局
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2022 Jan;66(1):20-25. doi: 10.5468/ogs.22232. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
2
To Move Beyond Statistical Significance and Consider Clinical Relevance.超越统计学显著性,考虑临床相关性。
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2022 Jul;34(7):e315. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.02.003. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
3
Perinatal outcomes and factors affecting the survival rate of fetuses with twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome treated with fetoscopic laser coagulation: a single-center seven-year experience.
双胎输血综合征胎儿行胎儿镜激光凝固术治疗的围产结局及生存率影响因素:单中心 7 年经验
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(25):5595-5606. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1888286. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
4
Comparison of placental characteristics of twin-twin transfusion syndrome with and without selective intrauterine growth restriction.比较有无选择性胎儿宫内生长受限的双胎输血综合征的胎盘特征。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Nov;35(22):4306-4311. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1849110. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
5
Fetal therapies as standard prenatal care in Japan.胎儿治疗在日本作为标准的产前护理。
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2020 Mar;63(2):108-116. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2020.63.2.108. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
6
Twin-Twin Transfusion Syndrome with and without Selective Fetal Growth Restriction Prior to Fetoscopic Laser Surgery: Short and Long-Term Outcome.胎儿镜激光手术前伴有或不伴有选择性胎儿生长受限的双胎输血综合征:短期和长期结局
J Clin Med. 2019 Jul 3;8(7):969. doi: 10.3390/jcm8070969.
7
Update on twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome.双胎输血综合征的最新进展。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Jul;58:55-65. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.12.011. Epub 2019 Jan 5.
8
Perinatal outcome of monochorionic twin pregnancy complicated by selective fetal growth restriction according to management: systematic review and meta-analysis.根据管理方法,复杂性选择性胎儿生长受限的单绒毛膜性双胎妊娠的围产儿结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;53(1):36-46. doi: 10.1002/uog.20114.
9
Fetal growth restriction in twins.双胎胎儿生长受限。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 May;49:79-88. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.02.004. Epub 2018 Feb 24.
10
Significance of placental cord insertion site in twin pregnancy.胎盘脐带插入部位在双胎妊娠中的意义。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Sep;52(3):378-384. doi: 10.1002/uog.18914.