Suppr超能文献

骨肉瘤的新辅助化疗:一项基于组织学肿瘤反应进行挽救性化疗的随机合作试验(COSS - 82)的结果

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy of osteosarcoma: results of a randomized cooperative trial (COSS-82) with salvage chemotherapy based on histological tumor response.

作者信息

Winkler K, Beron G, Delling G, Heise U, Kabisch H, Purfürst C, Berger J, Ritter J, Jürgens H, Gerein V

机构信息

University Hospital, Hamburg, FRG.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 1988 Feb;6(2):329-37. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1988.6.2.329.

Abstract

Following observation of the predictive value of the histologic extent of tumor cell destruction after preoperative chemotherapy for metastasis-free survival (MFS) in osteosarcoma, a randomized study was undertaken with the aim of (1) sparing some patients the unpleasant side effects of highly toxic drugs like doxorubicin (DOX) and cisplatin (CPDD) by administering these drugs postoperatively only after poor response with a milder preoperative regimen, and (2) improving the prognosis of patients responding poorly to the initial treatment by use of a salvage chemotherapy postoperatively. The available patients were divided into two groups. Those in the study arm received a preoperative chemotherapy consisting of high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) and the triple drug combination of bleomycin, cyclophosphamide, and dactinomycin (BCD) and were switched to DOX/CPDD postoperatively in case of poor response. DOX/CPDD was used besides HDMTX for initial treatment in the control arm, and BCD alternatively with CPDD/ifosfamide (IFO) for postoperative salvage treatment. The response rate of the study arm was significantly inferior to the control arm (26% v 60%; P less than .001). The actuarial 4-year MFS rate of poor responders after salvage chemotherapy also was poorest in the study arm (41%); it was unchanged in the control arm (53%) as compared with that of poor responders from the COSS-80 study without salvage chemotherapy (52%). The actuarial 4-year MFS rate of good responders was 73% in the study arm, 79% in the control arm, and not significantly different from that of the COSS-80 study (84%), although postoperative chemotherapy of good responders had been markedly shortened as compared with the COSS-80 study. The actuarial 4-year MFS rate of the study arm as a whole was inferior to that of the control arm (49% v 68%; P less than .1) and also inferior to the COSS-80 study (68%; P less than .01), indicating a failure of the employed salvage strategy in general and especially of the effort to restrict the use of the very effective but highly toxic drugs DOX and CPDD to patients resistant to a less toxic initial treatment.

摘要

在观察到骨肉瘤术前化疗后肿瘤细胞破坏的组织学范围对无转移生存期(MFS)的预测价值后,开展了一项随机研究,其目的是:(1)通过仅在术前采用较温和方案治疗效果不佳后才在术后给予阿霉素(DOX)和顺铂(CPDD)等剧毒药物,使部分患者避免这些药物带来的不良副作用;(2)通过术后采用挽救性化疗改善对初始治疗反应不佳患者的预后。将符合条件的患者分为两组。研究组患者接受由大剂量甲氨蝶呤(HDMTX)以及博来霉素、环磷酰胺和放线菌素D(BCD)三联药物组合构成的术前化疗,若反应不佳则术后改用DOX/CPDD。对照组初始治疗除使用HDMTX外还使用DOX/CPDD,术后挽救治疗则交替使用BCD与CPDD/异环磷酰胺(IFO)。研究组的缓解率显著低于对照组(26%对60%;P<0.001)。挽救性化疗后反应不佳患者的4年精算MFS率在研究组中也是最差的(41%);与未进行挽救性化疗的COSS - 80研究中反应不佳患者的52%相比,对照组未变(53%)。研究组中反应良好患者的4年精算MFS率为73%,对照组为79%,与COSS - 80研究(84%)相比无显著差异,尽管与COSS - 80研究相比,反应良好患者的术后化疗已显著缩短。研究组总体的4年精算MFS率低于对照组(49%对68%;P<0.1),也低于COSS - 80研究(68%;P<0.01),表明所采用的挽救策略总体失败,尤其是将非常有效但毒性很强的药物DOX和CPDD仅用于对毒性较小的初始治疗耐药患者的努力失败了。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验