文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

颈椎间盘突出症或神经孔狭窄后路全内镜下颈椎侧方减压术后颈椎运动学变化。

Cervical kinematic change after posterior full-endoscopic cervical foraminotomy for disc herniation or foraminal stenosis.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Division of Medical Statistics, Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Feb 21;18(2):e0281926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281926. eCollection 2023.


DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0281926
PMID:36809260
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9942978/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Posterior full-endoscopic cervical foraminotomy (PECF) is one of minimally invasive surgical techniques for cervical radiculopathy. Because of minimal disruption of posterior cervical structures, such as facet joint, cervical kinematics was minimally changed. However, a larger resection of facet joint is required for cervical foraminal stenosis (FS) than disc herniation (DH). The objective was to compare the cervical kinematics between patients with FS and DH after PECF. METHODS: Consecutive 52 patients (DH, 34 vs. FS, 18) who underwent PECF for single-level radiculopathy were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical parameters (neck disability index, neck pain and arm pain), and segmental, cervical and global radiological parameters were compared at postoperative 3, 6, and 12 months, and yearly thereafter. A linear mixed-effect model was used to assess interactions between groups and time. Any occurrence of significant pain during follow-up was recorded during a mean follow-up period of 45.5 months (range 24-113 months). RESULTS: Clinical parameters improved after PECF, with no significant differences between groups. Recurrent pain occurred in 6 patients and surgery (PECF, anterior discectomy and fusion) was performed in 2 patients. Pain-free survival rate was 91% for DH and 83% for FS, with no significant difference between the groups (P = 0.29). Radiological changes were not different between groups (P > 0.05). Segmental neutral and extension curvature became more lordotic. Cervical curvature became more lordotic on neutral and extension X-rays, and the range of cervical motion increased. The mismatch between T1-slope and cervical curvature decreased. Disc height did not change, but the index level showed degeneration at postoperative 2 years. CONCLUSION: Clinical and radiological outcomes after PECF were not different between DH and FS patients and kinematics were significantly improved. These findings may be informative in a shared decision-making process.

摘要

目的:后路全内镜下颈椎侧方椎间孔切开术(PECF)是治疗颈椎神经根病的微创外科技术之一。由于对后颈椎结构(如关节突关节)的破坏最小,颈椎运动学变化最小。然而,颈椎管狭窄症(FS)比椎间盘突出症(DH)需要更大的关节突切除。目的是比较 PECF 治疗单节段神经根病后 FS 和 DH 患者的颈椎运动学。

方法:回顾性分析了连续 52 例(DH 组 34 例,FS 组 18 例)接受 PECF 治疗的单节段神经根病患者。术后 3、6、12 个月及以后每年比较临床参数(颈椎障碍指数、颈痛和臂痛)和节段、颈椎和整体影像学参数。采用线性混合效应模型评估组间和时间的相互作用。在平均随访 45.5 个月(24-113 个月)期间,记录任何随访期间出现的显著疼痛。

结果:PECF 后临床参数改善,组间无显著差异。6 例患者出现复发性疼痛,2 例患者行手术(PECF、前路椎间盘切除融合术)。DH 和 FS 的无疼痛生存率分别为 91%和 83%,组间无显著差异(P=0.29)。组间影像学变化无差异(P>0.05)。节段中立和伸展曲率变得更前凸。中立位和伸展位 X 线颈椎曲率更前凸,颈椎活动范围增加。T1 斜率与颈椎曲率之间的不匹配减少。椎间盘高度无变化,但在术后 2 年索引水平显示退变。

结论:DH 和 FS 患者 PECF 后的临床和影像学结果无差异,运动学显著改善。这些发现可能对共同决策过程提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ae/9942978/83d145c13703/pone.0281926.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ae/9942978/1fd021d9ea68/pone.0281926.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ae/9942978/6edc72ee0ff3/pone.0281926.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ae/9942978/4f139c62352c/pone.0281926.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ae/9942978/3efe6a4b501b/pone.0281926.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ae/9942978/83d145c13703/pone.0281926.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ae/9942978/1fd021d9ea68/pone.0281926.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ae/9942978/6edc72ee0ff3/pone.0281926.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ae/9942978/4f139c62352c/pone.0281926.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ae/9942978/3efe6a4b501b/pone.0281926.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ae/9942978/83d145c13703/pone.0281926.g005.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Cervical kinematic change after posterior full-endoscopic cervical foraminotomy for disc herniation or foraminal stenosis.

PLoS One. 2023

[2]
Minimally Invasive Full-Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy Assisted by O-Arm-Based Navigation.

Pain Physician. 2018-5

[3]
Comparison of Cervical Sagittal Alignment and Kinematics after Posterior Full-endoscopic Cervical Foraminotomy and Discectomy According to Preoperative Cervical Alignment.

Pain Physician. 2017-2

[4]
[Surgical design and clinical application of posterior percutaneous full-endoscopic cervical foraminotomy for cervical osseous foraminal stenosis].

Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018-5-15

[5]
Changes in cervical motion after cervical spinal motion preservation surgery.

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2018-2

[6]
Complications, outcomes, and need for fusion after minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy and microdiscectomy.

Spine J. 2014-10-1

[7]
Minimally invasive cervical foraminotomy and diskectomy for laterally located soft disk herniation.

Eur Spine J. 2015-12

[8]
Safe Route for Cervical Approach: Partial Pediculotomy, Partial Vertebrotomy Approach for Posterior Endoscopic Cervical Foraminotomy and Discectomy.

World Neurosurg. 2020-5-11

[9]
Changes in foraminal area with anterior decompression versus keyhole foraminotomy in the cervical spine: a biomechanical investigation.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2017-12

[10]
Standalone Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Combination with Foraminotomy for the Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy Secondary to Bony Foraminal Stenosis.

World Neurosurg. 2016-11

引用本文的文献

[1]
Collagenase Chemonucleolysis for Treating Cervical Disc Herniation: An Exploratory, Single-Arm, Open-Label, Multicenter Clinical Trial.

Pain Ther. 2025-2

本文引用的文献

[1]
Reciprocal Changes Following Cervical Realignment Surgery.

Neurospine. 2022-12

[2]
Comparison between Anterior Cervical Decompression with Fusion and Posterior Cervical Fusion with Wide Facetectomy for Treatment of Severe Bony Foraminal Stenosis.

J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2021-7

[3]
Association of Spinal Alignment Correction With Patient-Reported Outcomes in Adult Cervical Deformity: Review of the Literature.

Neurospine. 2021-9

[4]
Anatomical Importance Between Neural Structure and Bony Landmark: Clinical Importance for Posterior Endoscopic Cervical Foraminotomy.

Neurospine. 2021-3

[5]
Impact of Nonlordotic Sagittal Alignment on Short-term Outcomes of Cervical Disc Replacement.

Neurospine. 2020-9

[6]
Surgical Impact on Global Sagittal Alignment and Health-Related Quality of Life Following Cervical Kyphosis Correction Surgery: Systematic Review.

Neurospine. 2020-9

[7]
Cervical Sagittal Alignment: Literature Review and Future Directions.

Neurospine. 2020-9

[8]
Feasibility of Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy for Adjacent Segmental Disease after Anterior Cervical Fusion.

J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2020-11

[9]
Posterior Endoscopic Cervical Decompression: Review and Technical Note.

Neurospine. 2020-7

[10]
Posterior foraminotomy versus anterior decompression and fusion in patients with cervical degenerative disc disease with radiculopathy: up to 5 years of outcome from the national Swedish Spine Register.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2019-11-15

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索