Suppr超能文献

线索类型会影响对任务抑制的准备性影响。

Cue type affects preparatory influences on task inhibition.

作者信息

Gade Miriam, Koch Iring

机构信息

University of Zurich, Institute of Psychology, General Psychology, Cognition, Switzerland.

RWTH Aachen University, Institute of Psychology, Germany.

出版信息

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 May;148:12-8. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.12.009. Epub 2014 Jan 29.

Abstract

The present study investigates the influence of preparation on inhibitory effects in cued task switching. In three experiments, we assessed n - 2 repetition costs as marker of inhibition of the just executed and now irrelevant task by comparing performance in task sequences such as ABA (i.e., n - 2 repetitions, with A, B and C standing for different tasks) to task sequences such as CBA (i.e., n - 2 switches). Specifically, we varied the cue-target interval (CTI) to examine cue-based preparation effects. In addition, we manipulated cue type (i.e., abstract, verbal, and direct cues) across the three experiments. We obtained significant reductions of n - 2 repetition costs with prolonged CTI when using abstract cues (i.e., coloured frames) and task names (i.e., digit), but not when using the task-specific stimulus-response mapping as cue for the upcoming task. These data suggest that cue-based preparation is not a uniform process but depends on the information provided by the cue.

摘要

本研究调查了准备状态对线索提示任务切换中抑制效应的影响。在三个实验中,我们通过比较ABA(即n - 2次重复,其中A、B和C代表不同任务)等任务序列与CBA(即n - 2次切换)等任务序列的表现,评估了n - 2重复代价,将其作为对刚刚执行且现在无关任务的抑制的指标。具体而言,我们改变线索-目标间隔(CTI)以检验基于线索的准备效应。此外,我们在三个实验中操纵了线索类型(即抽象线索、言语线索和直接线索)。当使用抽象线索(即彩色框架)和任务名称(即数字)时,随着CTI延长,我们观察到n - 2重复代价显著降低,但当使用特定任务的刺激-反应映射作为即将到来任务的线索时,情况并非如此。这些数据表明,基于线索的准备不是一个统一的过程,而是取决于线索提供的信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验