• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

任务无关的复杂偏差刺激对反应的促进作用。

Facilitation of responses by task-irrelevant complex deviant stimuli.

作者信息

Schomaker J, Meeter M

机构信息

Department of Cognitive Psychology, VU University, The Netherlands.

Department of Cognitive Psychology, VU University, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 May;148:74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.01.006. Epub 2014 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.01.006
PMID:24486809
Abstract

Novel stimuli reliably attract attention, suggesting that novelty may disrupt performance when it is task-irrelevant. However, under certain circumstances novel stimuli can also elicit a general alerting response having beneficial effects on performance. In a series of experiments we investigated whether different aspects of novelty--stimulus novelty, contextual novelty, surprise, deviance, and relative complexity--lead to distraction or facilitation. We used a version of the visual oddball paradigm in which participants responded to an occasional auditory target. Participants responded faster to this auditory target when it occurred during the presentation of novel visual stimuli than of standard stimuli, especially at SOAs of 0 and 200 ms (Experiment 1). Facilitation was absent for both infrequent simple deviants and frequent complex images (Experiment 2). However, repeated complex deviant images did facilitate responses to the auditory target at the 200 ms SOA (Experiment 3). These findings suggest that task-irrelevant deviant visual stimuli can facilitate responses to an unrelated auditory target in a short 0-200 millisecond time-window after presentation. This only occurs when the deviant stimuli are complex relative to standard stimuli. We link our findings to the novelty P3, which is generated under the same circumstances, and to the adaptive gain theory of the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system (Aston-Jones and Cohen, 2005), which may explain the timing of the effects.

摘要

新颖刺激能够可靠地吸引注意力,这表明当新颖性与任务无关时,可能会干扰表现。然而,在某些情况下,新颖刺激也能引发一种对表现有有益影响的一般警觉反应。在一系列实验中,我们研究了新颖性的不同方面——刺激新颖性、情境新颖性、惊奇感、偏差和相对复杂性——是否会导致分心或促进作用。我们使用了一种视觉oddball范式的变体,其中参与者对偶尔出现的听觉目标做出反应。当听觉目标出现在新颖视觉刺激呈现期间而非标准刺激呈现期间时,参与者对该听觉目标的反应更快,尤其是在0和200毫秒的刺激间隔时间(SOA)时(实验1)。对于不频繁出现的简单偏差刺激和频繁出现的复杂图像,均未出现促进作用(实验2)。然而,重复出现的复杂偏差图像在200毫秒的刺激间隔时间时确实促进了对听觉目标的反应(实验3)。这些发现表明,与任务无关的偏差视觉刺激在呈现后的0 - 200毫秒短时间窗口内能够促进对不相关听觉目标的反应。只有当偏差刺激相对于标准刺激较为复杂时,这种情况才会发生。我们将我们的发现与在相同情况下产生的新颖性P3以及蓝斑 - 去甲肾上腺素系统的适应性增益理论(Aston - Jones和Cohen,2005)联系起来,该理论可能解释了这种效应的时间安排。

相似文献

1
Facilitation of responses by task-irrelevant complex deviant stimuli.任务无关的复杂偏差刺激对反应的促进作用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 May;148:74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.01.006. Epub 2014 Feb 1.
2
Distraction by deviance: comparing the effects of auditory and visual deviant stimuli on auditory and visual target processing.异常刺激的干扰:比较听觉和视觉异常刺激对听觉和视觉目标加工的影响。
Exp Psychol. 2015;62(1):54-65. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000273.
3
Stimulus complexity effects on the event-related potentials to task-irrelevant stimuli.刺激复杂性对任务无关刺激的事件相关电位的影响。
Biol Psychol. 2013 Sep;94(1):82-9. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.05.007. Epub 2013 May 20.
4
Sadness increases distraction by auditory deviant stimuli.悲伤会增加对听觉偏差刺激的分心。
Emotion. 2014 Feb;14(1):203-13. doi: 10.1037/a0034289. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
5
The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.视觉任务难度和注意方向对以失配负波为指标的听觉变化检测的影响。
Brain Res. 2006 Mar 17;1078(1):112-30. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.12.125. Epub 2006 Feb 21.
6
Assessing cross-modal target transition effects with a visual-auditory oddball.使用视觉-听觉Oddball 评估跨模态目标转换效应。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2018 Jul;129:58-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.04.010. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
7
When aging does not increase distraction: Evidence from pure auditory and visual oddball tasks.衰老不会增加干扰:来自纯听觉和视觉Oddball任务的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Dec;41(6):1612-22. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000112. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
8
Behavioral distraction by auditory novelty is not only about novelty: the role of the distracter's informational value.听觉新颖性引起的行为分心不仅与新颖性有关:分心物的信息价值的作用。
Cognition. 2010 Jun;115(3):504-11. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.03.002. Epub 2010 Mar 24.
9
'What's in a name?' 'No more than when it's mine own'. Evidence from auditory oddball distraction.“名字有什么意义?”“对于我来说,名字并没有什么意义。”来自听觉失匹配负波干扰的证据。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Jul;150:161-6. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.05.009. Epub 2014 May 31.
10
Early auditory change detection implicitly facilitated by ignored concurrent visual change during a Braille reading task.在盲文阅读任务中,被忽略的同时发生的视觉变化会隐式促进早期听觉变化检测。
J Integr Neurosci. 2013 Sep;12(3):385-99. doi: 10.1142/S0219635213500234. Epub 2013 Sep 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Neural Mechanisms Underlying the Effects of Novel Sounds on Task Performance in Children With and Without ADHD.新声音对患有和未患有注意力缺陷多动障碍儿童任务表现影响的神经机制
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Jun 21;16:878994. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.878994. eCollection 2022.
2
Alignment of Continuous Auditory and Visual Distractor Stimuli Is Leading to an Increased Performance.连续听觉和视觉干扰刺激的对齐导致表现提高。
Front Psychol. 2020 May 8;11:790. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00790. eCollection 2020.
3
Task-Irrelevant Novel Sounds have Antithetical Effects on Visual Target Processing in Young and Old Adults.
与任务无关的新奇声音对年轻人和老年人的视觉目标处理有相反的影响。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2017 Oct 31;9:348. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00348. eCollection 2017.