• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“名字有什么意义?”“对于我来说,名字并没有什么意义。”来自听觉失匹配负波干扰的证据。

'What's in a name?' 'No more than when it's mine own'. Evidence from auditory oddball distraction.

作者信息

Ljungberg Jessica K, Parmentier Fabrice B R, Jones Dylan M, Marsja Erik, Neely Gregory

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; School of Psychology, Cardiff University, UK.

Department of Psychology, University of the Balearic Islands, Spain; School of Psychology, University of Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Jul;150:161-6. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.05.009. Epub 2014 May 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.05.009
PMID:24880979
Abstract

Research of the distractor value of hearing the own name has shown that this self-referring stimulus captures attention in an involuntary fashion and create distraction. The behavioral studies are few and the outcomes are not always clear cut. In this study the distraction by own name compared to a control name was investigated by using a cross-modal oddball task in two experiments. In the first experiment, thirty-nine participants were conducting a computerized categorization task while exposed to, to-be ignored own and matched control names (controlling for familiarity, gender and number of syllables) as unexpected auditory deviant stimulus (12.5% trials for each name category) and a sine wave tone as a standard stimulus (75% of the trials). In the second experiment, another group of thirty-nine participants completed the same task but with the additional deviant stimulus of an irrelevant word added (10% trials for each deviant type and 70% trials with the standard stimulus). Results showed deviant distraction by exposure to both the irrelevant word, own and the control name compared to the standard tone but no differences were found showing that the own name captured attention and distracted the participants more than an irrelevant word or a control name. The results elucidate the role of the own name as a potent auditory distractor and possible limitations with its theoretical significance for general theories of attention are discussed.

摘要

关于听到自己名字的干扰值的研究表明,这种自我指涉性刺激会以一种非自愿的方式吸引注意力并造成干扰。行为学研究较少,且结果并不总是清晰明确。在本研究中,通过在两个实验中使用跨模态奇偶数任务,对自己名字与对照名字相比产生的干扰进行了调查。在第一个实验中,39名参与者在进行计算机化分类任务时,会接触到作为意外听觉偏差刺激的、待忽略的自己的名字和匹配的对照名字(控制熟悉度、性别和音节数)(每个名字类别占12.5%的试验次数),以及作为标准刺激的正弦波音调(占75%的试验次数)。在第二个实验中,另一组39名参与者完成相同任务,但增加了一个无关单词的偏差刺激(每种偏差类型占10%的试验次数,标准刺激占70%的试验次数)。结果显示,与标准音调相比,接触无关单词、自己的名字和对照名字都会产生偏差干扰,但未发现差异,表明自己的名字比无关单词或对照名字更能吸引注意力并分散参与者的注意力。研究结果阐明了自己名字作为一种强大听觉干扰因素的作用,并讨论了其在注意力一般理论方面理论意义的可能局限性。

相似文献

1
'What's in a name?' 'No more than when it's mine own'. Evidence from auditory oddball distraction.“名字有什么意义?”“对于我来说,名字并没有什么意义。”来自听觉失匹配负波干扰的证据。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Jul;150:161-6. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.05.009. Epub 2014 May 31.
2
Distraction by deviance: comparing the effects of auditory and visual deviant stimuli on auditory and visual target processing.异常刺激的干扰:比较听觉和视觉异常刺激对听觉和视觉目标加工的影响。
Exp Psychol. 2015;62(1):54-65. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000273.
3
Behavioral distraction by auditory deviance is mediated by the sound's informational value. Evidence from an auditory discrimination task.听觉偏差引起的行为分心由声音的信息价值介导。来自听觉辨别任务的证据。
Exp Psychol. 2013;60(4):260-8. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000196.
4
When aging does not increase distraction: Evidence from pure auditory and visual oddball tasks.衰老不会增加干扰:来自纯听觉和视觉Oddball任务的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Dec;41(6):1612-22. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000112. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
5
Facilitation of responses by task-irrelevant complex deviant stimuli.任务无关的复杂偏差刺激对反应的促进作用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 May;148:74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.01.006. Epub 2014 Feb 1.
6
Sadness increases distraction by auditory deviant stimuli.悲伤会增加对听觉偏差刺激的分心。
Emotion. 2014 Feb;14(1):203-13. doi: 10.1037/a0034289. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
7
The cognitive locus of distraction by acoustic novelty in the cross-modal oddball task.跨通道Oddball任务中声音新奇性引起分心的认知位点。
Cognition. 2008 Jan;106(1):408-32. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.008. Epub 2007 Apr 18.
8
Aging increases distraction by auditory oddballs in visual, but not auditory tasks.衰老会增加视觉任务中听觉异常刺激引起的注意力分散,但在听觉任务中不会。
Psychol Res. 2015 May;79(3):401-10. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0573-5. Epub 2014 May 23.
9
The informational constraints of behavioral distraction by unexpected sounds: the role of event information.行为分心的信息约束:意外声音的作用——事件信息。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Sep;38(5):1461-8. doi: 10.1037/a0028149. Epub 2012 May 7.
10
Distraction by deviant sounds: disgusting and neutral words capture attention to the same extent.分散注意力的异常声音:令人厌恶和中性的词语吸引注意力的程度相同。
Psychol Res. 2020 Oct;84(7):1801-1814. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01192-4. Epub 2019 May 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Neurophysiological Evidence for Semantic Processing of Irrelevant Speech and Own-Name Detection in a Virtual Café.神经生理学证据表明,在虚拟咖啡馆中,人们可以对无关言语进行语义处理,并检测到自己的名字。
J Neurosci. 2023 Jul 5;43(27):5045-5056. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1731-22.2023. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
2
Distraction by violation of sensory predictions: Functional distinction between deviant sounds and unexpected silences.感官预测违背引起的分心:异常声音和意外静音之间的功能区别。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 6;17(9):e0274188. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274188. eCollection 2022.
3
Longitudinal Differences in Response to Name Among Infants Developing ASD and Risk for ADHD.
自闭症谱系障碍和注意缺陷多动障碍风险婴儿对名字反应的纵向差异。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2021 Mar;51(3):827-836. doi: 10.1007/s10803-020-04369-8.
4
Metacognition in Auditory Distraction: How Expectations about Distractibility Influence the Irrelevant Sound Effect.听觉分心任务中的元认知:关于分心可能性的预期如何影响无关声音效应。
J Cogn. 2017 Nov 30;1(1):2. doi: 10.5334/joc.3.
5
Food words distract the hungry: Evidence of involuntary semantic processing of task-irrelevant but biologically-relevant unexpected auditory words.食物相关词汇会分散饥饿者的注意力:无关但与生物相关的意外听觉词汇的非自愿语义加工证据。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 4;13(1):e0190644. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190644. eCollection 2018.