• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用 Clavien-Dindo 分类标准对乳腺癌手术中的发病率进行评估的标准化。

Standardization of morbidity assessment in breast cancer surgery using the Clavien Dindo Classification.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Breast Health Center, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, Austria.

Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Breast Health Center, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2014;12(4):334-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.01.012. Epub 2014 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.01.012
PMID:24486930
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There are no published data on standardized scoring systems for morbidity after breast cancer surgery. Aim of the study was to establish the Clavien Dindo Classification (CDC) as assessment tool and to identify risk factors for morbidity after breast surgery investigating new techniques including oncoplastic surgery and neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2008 and 2010, data were retrospectively evaluated from 485 women with breast cancer who underwent surgery at a university hospital. The CDC was used to assess the severity of postoperative complications. Multivariable analyses were adjusted by body-mass index, smoking, diabetes mellitus and tumour size.

RESULTS

Overall complications (CDC 1-4) were reported in 28.7%. Second surgery related to major complications (CDC 3-4) was mandatory in 4.7%. Axillary dissection was an independent predictor for CDC 1-4 in all patients (P = 0.008, OR of 1.81, 95%CI 1.17-2.82). We found no independent predictor for CDC 3-4. Oncoplastic surgery increased the rate of wound infections (P = 0.010, OR: 2.94, 95%CI 1.30-6.67) and necroses (P < 0.001, OR: 8.38, 95%CI 3.28-21.4). Axillary dissection elevated wound infection (P = 0.040, OR: 2.07, 95%CI 1.03-4.14) and seroma rates (P < 0.001, OR: 2.46, 95%CI 1.51-4.01). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy had no impact on morbidity.

CONCLUSION

The CDC is a valid assessment tool for future clinical trials and may be useful for hospital quality control. While axillary dissection and oncoplastic surgery raised morbidity, no single factor predicted for morbidity related second surgery.

摘要

简介

目前尚无关于乳腺癌手术后发病率的标准化评分系统的相关数据。本研究旨在建立克利夫兰分类(CDC)作为评估工具,并确定乳腺癌手术发病率的风险因素,包括新的技术,如肿瘤整形术和新辅助化疗。

方法

回顾性分析 2008 年至 2010 年间在一家大学医院接受手术的 485 例乳腺癌患者的数据。使用 CDC 评估术后并发症的严重程度。多变量分析通过体重指数、吸烟、糖尿病和肿瘤大小进行调整。

结果

总并发症(CDC1-4)发生率为 28.7%。需要二次手术的严重并发症(CDC3-4)发生率为 4.7%。腋窝清扫术是所有患者发生 CDC1-4 的独立预测因素(P=0.008,OR 为 1.81,95%CI 为 1.17-2.82)。我们没有发现与 CDC3-4 相关的独立预测因素。肿瘤整形术增加了伤口感染(P=0.010,OR:2.94,95%CI 为 1.30-6.67)和坏死(P<0.001,OR:8.38,95%CI 为 3.28-21.4)的发生率。腋窝清扫术增加了伤口感染(P=0.040,OR:2.07,95%CI 为 1.03-4.14)和血清肿的发生率(P<0.001,OR:2.46,95%CI 为 1.51-4.01)。新辅助化疗对发病率没有影响。

结论

CDC 是未来临床试验的有效评估工具,也可用于医院质量控制。虽然腋窝清扫术和肿瘤整形术增加了发病率,但没有单一因素可以预测与二次手术相关的发病率。

相似文献

1
Standardization of morbidity assessment in breast cancer surgery using the Clavien Dindo Classification.采用 Clavien-Dindo 分类标准对乳腺癌手术中的发病率进行评估的标准化。
Int J Surg. 2014;12(4):334-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.01.012. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
2
High body mass index and smoking predict morbidity in breast cancer surgery: a multivariate analysis of 26,988 patients from the national surgical quality improvement program database.高身体质量指数和吸烟预测乳腺癌手术发病率:国家手术质量改进计划数据库中 26988 例患者的多变量分析。
Ann Surg. 2012 Mar;255(3):551-5. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318246c294.
3
Comparative analysis of the incidence of surgical site infections in patients with liver resection for colorectal hepatic metastases after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.新辅助化疗后结直肠肝转移行肝切除术患者的手术部位感染发生率的对比分析。
J Surg Res. 2014 May 1;188(1):183-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.11.1092. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
4
Determinants of wound infections for breast procedures: assessment of the risk of wound infection posed by an invasive procedure for subsequent operation.乳房手术的伤口感染决定因素:评估后续手术中侵袭性操作造成伤口感染的风险。
Int J Surg. 2009 Dec;7(6):543-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.08.012. Epub 2009 Sep 10.
5
Surgical management of early stage invasive breast cancer: a practice guideline.早期浸润性乳腺癌的外科治疗:实践指南
Can J Surg. 2005 Jun;48(3):185-94.
6
Early self-reported impairments in arm functioning of primary breast cancer patients predict late side effects of axillary lymph node dissection: results from a population-based cohort study.原发性乳腺癌患者早期自我报告的手臂功能损伤可预测腋窝淋巴结清扫术的晚期副作用:一项基于人群的队列研究结果
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006 Dec;100(3):285-92. doi: 10.1007/s10549-006-9247-3. Epub 2006 May 20.
7
[Post operative complications after neoadjuvant systemic therapy in primary breast cancer treatment - Case-control study].[新辅助全身治疗在原发性乳腺癌治疗中的术后并发症——病例对照研究]
Rev Med Brux. 2016;37(6):469-475.
8
[Clavien-Dindo classification and risk factors for complications after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer].[胃癌根治性胃切除术后的Clavien-Dindo分类及并发症危险因素]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2013 Dec;93(46):3667-70.
9
Incidence and predictors of neuropathic pain following breast surgery.乳腺手术后神经病理性疼痛的发生率及预测因素。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Oct;20(10):3330-4. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3156-6. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
10
Breast irradiation in women with early stage invasive breast cancer following breast conservation surgery. Provincial Breast Disease Site Group.保乳手术后早期浸润性乳腺癌女性的乳房放疗。省级乳腺疾病站点组。
Cancer Prev Control. 1997 Aug;1(3):228-40.

引用本文的文献

1
The Combination of Chest Wall Perforator Flaps and Surgeon-Performed Breast Ultrasound: An Effective Synergy to Expand the Boundaries of Breast-Conserving Surgery.胸壁穿支皮瓣与外科医生实施的乳腺超声检查相结合:一种扩大保乳手术边界的有效协同作用。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Sep 12. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-18281-x.
2
Pilot Study: Blue Light Photobiomodulation for the Treatment of Complicated Wounds in Breast Surgery.试点研究:蓝光光生物调节疗法治疗乳腺手术中的复杂伤口
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 Jul 28;13(7):e6989. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006989. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Breast-Conserving Oncoplastic Surgery Stratification: Morbidity Retrospective Analysis and its Association with Procedure Complexity Level.
保乳肿瘤整形手术分层:发病率回顾性分析及其与手术复杂程度的关联
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Jul 20. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17838-0.
4
Advantages of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction over delayed breast reconstruction in women treated with postmastectomy radiotherapy for breast cancer.对于接受乳腺癌乳房切除术后放疗的女性,即刻植入式乳房重建相较于延迟乳房重建的优势。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Jul;212(1):37-46. doi: 10.1007/s10549-025-07690-x. Epub 2025 May 12.
5
Chest Wall Perforator Flaps in Breast Conservation: Versatile, Affordable, and Scalable: Insights from the Largest Single-Surgeon Audit from India.保乳手术中胸壁穿支皮瓣:多功能、经济且可扩展:来自印度最大规模单中心手术审计的见解
Curr Oncol. 2025 Mar 14;32(3):165. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32030165.
6
High-impact complications after breast cancer surgery in the Dutch national quality registry: evaluating case-mix adjustment for hospital comparisons.荷兰国家质量登记处中乳腺癌手术后的高影响并发症:评估用于医院比较的病例组合调整。
BJS Open. 2024 Dec 30;9(1). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae147.
7
Vasoactive Inotrope Score as a Predictor of Postoperative Complications in Cancer Surgery Patients-A Prospective Observational Study.血管活性正性肌力药物评分作为癌症手术患者术后并发症的预测指标——一项前瞻性观察研究
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2024 Dec;15(4):844-848. doi: 10.1007/s13193-024-02004-x. Epub 2024 Jun 29.
8
Clinical Outcomes for BRCA Pathogenic Variant Carriers With Breast Cancer Undergoing Breast Conservation.BRCA 致病性变异携带者行保乳术治疗乳腺癌的临床结局。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2418486. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.18486.
9
Role of allogeneic placental tissues in penile inversion vaginoplasty.同种异体胎盘组织在阴茎内翻阴道成形术中的作用。
Transl Androl Urol. 2024 May 31;13(5):736-747. doi: 10.21037/tau-23-420. Epub 2024 May 28.
10
Level-2 Oncoplastic Surgical Techniques for Breast Cancer: A Preliminary Vietnamese Report.2 级乳腺癌整形手术技术:越南初步报告。
Med Arch. 2024;78(2):131-138. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2024.78.131-138.