Kim Byung Seup, Kang Kyung Ho, Kang Hyun, Park Sung Jun
Departments of *Surgery †Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2014 Feb;24(1):67-72. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182a4bfec.
Despite advancements in surgical robot technology, the da Vinci-assisted central neck dissection (CND) in thyroid cancer remains challenging. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of robotic thyroidectomy and CND.
Between March 2011 and July 2012, 515 consecutive patients who had undergone thyroidectomy and CND for papillary thyroid carcinoma were retrospectively reviewed. A thyroid surgeon performed either an open thyroidectomy and CND (n=392) or a robotic thyroidectomy and CND (n=123) using the bilateral axillo-breast approach (BABA). Propensity score matching using 10 clinicopathologic factors was used to generate 2 matched cohorts, each composed of 123 patients.
Mean age, body mass index, and tumor size were lower in those who underwent BABA compared with an open procedure before propensity matching. Evaluation of stimulated thyroglobulin levels did not show significant differences between the 2 groups. After cohort matching, significant differences in age, body mass index, and tumor size between the 2 groups were no longer present. The matched cohort showed that the number of retrieved lymph nodes was lower in the BABA (8.74±5.13) than in the open thyroidectomy (10.71±6.68) (P=0.006).
BABA robotic thyroidectomy revealed that a less-extensive CND was obtained when compared with an open procedure. BABA may be suitable for thyroid cancer without lymphadenopathy in central neck compartment. Conversely, BABA should not be recommended to a patient with thyroid cancer when multiple lymph node metastases in the lower central neck compartment are suspected.
尽管手术机器人技术取得了进展,但达芬奇辅助的甲状腺癌中央区颈淋巴结清扫术(CND)仍然具有挑战性。本研究的目的是评估机器人甲状腺切除术和CND的可行性。
回顾性分析2011年3月至2012年7月连续515例行甲状腺切除术和CND治疗的甲状腺乳头状癌患者。一名甲状腺外科医生采用双侧腋窝-乳房入路(BABA)进行开放甲状腺切除术和CND(n = 392)或机器人甲状腺切除术和CND(n = 123)。使用10个临床病理因素进行倾向评分匹配,以生成2个匹配队列,每个队列由123名患者组成。
在倾向匹配前,接受BABA手术的患者的平均年龄、体重指数和肿瘤大小低于开放手术患者。对刺激甲状腺球蛋白水平的评估显示两组之间无显著差异。队列匹配后,两组之间在年龄、体重指数和肿瘤大小方面不再存在显著差异。匹配队列显示,BABA组(8.74±5.13)的淋巴结清扫数量低于开放甲状腺切除术组(10.71±6.68)(P = 0.006)。
BABA机器人甲状腺切除术显示,与开放手术相比,CND范围较小。BABA可能适用于中央区无淋巴结转移的甲状腺癌。相反,当怀疑甲状腺癌患者在下颈部中央区有多个淋巴结转移时,不建议采用BABA。