School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, and Neuropsychology Unit, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
Merck Sharp and Dohme Research Laboratories, Harlow, UK.
Behav Neurol. 1996;9(3):135-48. doi: 10.3233/BEN-1996-93-405.
In vivo neuroimaging studies have generally indicated a greater involvement of posterior cortical areas in early-stage dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT) relative to frontal involvement. By contrast, some recent neuropsychological studies have shown that DAT patients perform poorly in frontal lobe tasks even in the early stages of the disease, although there is disagreement as to whether this necessarily implicates frontal pathology. The main aim of this study was to examine the hypothesis prompted by both neuroimaging studies and the traditional clinical conception of the disease, that, compared with the functioning of posterior association cortex, executive functions (thought to depend on frontal lobe integrity) are relatively spared in the early stages of DAT. A group of patients with a diagnosis of early-stage, probable DAT (n = 17) was compared with age- and IQ-matched controls (n = 17) across a range of neuropsychological tasks presumed to exercise frontal or temporoparietal functions. A profile of strengths and weaknesses was observed across 'anterior' and 'posterior' cognitive tests, including dissociations among some tests of temporoparietal function, in particular visual object perception (impaired) and spatial analysis skills (intact). Thus there was little support for the notion that the disease progresses cortically in a posterior-to-anterior direction. Possible reasons for the discrepancy between neurophysiological and neuropsychological observations are discussed, including the possibility that neuropsychological tests do not provide a valid indication of regional brain function when used in the context of DAT. Caution is urged in the clinical application of 'frontal lobe tests' for the differential diagnosis of DAT.
在体内神经影像学研究中,一般表明在阿尔茨海默病(DAT)的早期阶段,后皮质区域比额叶区域参与程度更高。相比之下,一些最近的神经心理学研究表明,即使在疾病的早期阶段,DAT 患者在额叶任务中表现不佳,尽管对于这是否必然意味着额叶病理学存在分歧。本研究的主要目的是检验神经影像学研究和疾病传统临床概念所提示的假设,即与后联合皮质的功能相比,执行功能(被认为依赖于额叶完整性)在 DAT 的早期阶段相对不受影响。一组被诊断为早期、可能的 DAT 患者(n = 17)与年龄和智商匹配的对照组(n = 17)进行了一系列神经心理学测试,这些测试被认为可以锻炼额叶或颞顶叶功能。在前额叶和后顶叶认知测试中观察到了一种优势和劣势的模式,包括一些颞顶叶功能测试之间的分离,特别是视觉物体感知(受损)和空间分析技能(完好无损)。因此,几乎没有证据支持疾病从前向后沿皮质方向发展的观点。讨论了神经生理学和神经心理学观察结果之间差异的可能原因,包括当在 DAT 背景下使用时,神经心理学测试可能无法为区域脑功能提供有效指示的可能性。在 DAT 的鉴别诊断中,对“额叶测试”的临床应用应谨慎。