Płotek Włodzimierz, Łyskawa Wojciech, Kluzik Anna, Grześkowiak Małgorzata, Podlewski Roland, Żaba Zbigniew, Drobnik Leon
Department of Teaching Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland.
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Medical Center in Pleszewo, Pleszew, Poland.
Med Sci Monit. 2014 Feb 3;20:173-81. doi: 10.12659/MSM.889776.
Human cognitive functioning can be assessed using different methods of testing. Age, level of education, and gender may influence the results of cognitive tests.
The well-known Trail Making Test (TMT), which is often used to measure the frontal lobe function, and the experimental test of Interval Timing (IT) were compared. The methods used in IT included reproduction of auditory and visual stimuli, with the subsequent production of the time intervals of 1-, 2-, 5-, and 7-seconds durations with no pattern. Subjects included 64 healthy adult volunteers aged 18-63 (33 women, 31 men). Comparisons were made based on age, education, and gender.
TMT was performed quickly and was influenced by age, education, and gender. All reproduced visual and produced intervals were shortened and the reproduction of auditory stimuli was more complex. Age, education, and gender have more pronounced impact on the cognitive test than on the interval timing test. The reproduction of the short auditory stimuli was more accurate in comparison to other modalities used in the IT test.
The interval timing, when compared to the TMT, offers an interesting possibility of testing. Further studies are necessary to confirm the initial observation.
人类认知功能可以通过不同的测试方法进行评估。年龄、教育水平和性别可能会影响认知测试的结果。
比较了常用于测量额叶功能的著名的连线测验(TMT)和间隔计时实验测试(IT)。IT中使用的方法包括对听觉和视觉刺激的再现,随后产生无规律的1秒、2秒、5秒和7秒时长的时间间隔。受试者包括64名年龄在18 - 63岁之间的健康成年志愿者(33名女性,31名男性)。基于年龄、教育程度和性别进行了比较。
TMT完成速度快,且受年龄、教育程度和性别的影响。所有再现的视觉和产生的时间间隔都缩短了,并且听觉刺激的再现更复杂。年龄、教育程度和性别对认知测试的影响比对间隔计时测试的影响更显著。与IT测试中使用的其他方式相比,短听觉刺激的再现更准确。
与TMT相比,间隔计时提供了一种有趣的测试可能性。需要进一步的研究来证实初步观察结果。