Olson Ashley D, Meyer Laurence, Prins Maria, Thiebaut Rodolphe, Gurdasani Deepti, Guiguet Marguerite, Chaix Marie-Laure, Amornkul Pauli, Babiker Abdel, Sandhu Manjinder S, Porter Kholoud
Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1018, Université Paris-Sud, le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 28;9(1):e86719. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086719. eCollection 2014.
Understanding the mechanisms underlying viral control is highly relevant to vaccine studies and elite control (EC) of HIV infection. Although numerous definitions of EC exist, it is not clear which, if any, best identify this rare phenotype.
We assessed a number of EC definitions used in the literature using CASCADE data of 25,692 HIV seroconverters. We estimated proportions maintaining EC of total ART-naïve follow-up time, and disease progression, comparing to non-EC. We also examined HIV-RNA and CD4 values and CD4 slope during EC and beyond (while ART naïve).
Most definitions classify ∼ 1% as ECs with median HIV-RNA 43-903 copies/ml and median CD4>500 cells/mm(3). Beyond EC status, median HIV-RNA levels remained low, although often detectable, and CD4 values high but with strong evidence of decline for all definitions. Median % ART-naïve time as EC was ≥ 92% although overlap between definitions was low. EC definitions with consecutive HIV-RNA measurements <75 copies/ml with follow-up ≥ six months, or with 90% of measurements <400 copies/ml over ≥ 10 year follow-up preformed best overall. Individuals thus defined were less likely to progress to endpoint (hazard ratios ranged from 12.5-19.0 for non-ECs compared to ECs).
ECs are rare, less likely to progress to clinical disease, but may eventually lose control. We suggest definitions requiring individuals to have consecutive undetectable HIV-RNA measurements for ≥ six months or otherwise with >90% of measurements <400 copies/ml over ≥ 10 years be used to define this phenotype.
了解病毒控制的潜在机制与疫苗研究以及HIV感染的精英控制(EC)密切相关。尽管存在众多关于EC的定义,但尚不清楚哪一个(如果有的话)能最好地识别这种罕见表型。
我们使用25692名HIV血清转化者的CASCADE数据评估了文献中使用的一些EC定义。我们估计了在未接受抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)的总随访时间内维持EC的比例以及疾病进展情况,并与非EC进行比较。我们还检查了EC期间及之后(未接受ART时)的HIV-RNA和CD4值以及CD4斜率。
大多数定义将约1%的人归类为EC,其HIV-RNA中位数为43 - 903拷贝/毫升,CD4中位数>500个细胞/立方毫米。除了EC状态外,HIV-RNA水平中位数仍然较低,尽管通常可检测到,并且所有定义的CD4值都较高,但有明显下降的证据。未接受ART时作为EC的时间中位数≥92%,尽管定义之间的重叠率较低。连续HIV-RNA测量值<75拷贝/毫升且随访≥6个月,或在≥10年的随访中90%的测量值<400拷贝/毫升的EC定义总体表现最佳。如此定义的个体进展至终点的可能性较小(与EC相比,非EC的风险比范围为12.5 - 19.0)。
EC患者很少见,进展为临床疾病的可能性较小,但最终可能失去控制。我们建议使用要求个体连续6个月以上HIV-RNA检测不到,或在≥10年内90%以上的测量值<400拷贝/毫升的定义来界定这种表型。