Harkey Matthew S, Gribble Phillip A, Pietrosimone Brian G
Musculoskeletal Health and Movement Science Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Toledo, OH. Mr Harkey and Dr Pietrosimone are now at the Neuromuscular Research Laboratory, Department of Exercise and Sports Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
J Athl Train. 2014 May-Jun;49(3):411-21. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-49.1.04. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
To determine the effects of various therapeutic interventions on increasing voluntary quadriceps muscle activation.
Decreased voluntary quadriceps activation is commonly associated with knee injury. Recently, research has focused on developing specific disinhibitory interventions to improve voluntary quadriceps activation; yet, it remains unknown which interventions are most effective in promoting this improvement.
We searched Web of Science from January 1, 1965 through September 27, 2012, using the key words quadriceps activation and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, transcranial magnetic stimulation, cryotherapy, focal joint cooling, joint mobilization, joint mobilisation, joint manipulation, manual therapy, and neuromuscular electrical stimulation.
Studies evaluating the effect of disinhibitory interventions on volitional quadriceps activation were used in our review. Standardized effect sizes (Cohen d) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated from voluntary quadriceps activation means and standard deviations measured at baseline and at all available postintervention time points from each study.
Ten studies were grouped into 5 categories based on intervention type: manual therapy (4 studies), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (2 studies), cryotherapy (2 studies), neuromuscular electrical stimulation (2 studies), and transcranial magnetic stimulation (1 study). Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation demonstrated the strongest immediate effects (d = 1.03; 95% CI = 0.06, 1.92) and long-term effects (d = 1.93; 95% CI = 0.91, 2.83). Cryotherapy (d = 0.76; 95% CI = -0.13, 1.59) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (d = 0.54; 95% CI = -0.33, 1.37) had moderate immediate effects in improving voluntary quadriceps activation, whereas manual therapy (d = 0.38; 95% CI = -0.35, 1.09) elicited only weak immediate effects. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation produced weak negative to strong positive effects (range of d values = -0.50 to 1.87) over a period of 3 weeks to 6 months.
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation demonstrated the strongest and most consistent effects in increasing voluntary quadriceps activation and may be the best disinhibitory intervention for improving the same.
确定各种治疗干预措施对增加股四头肌自主激活的效果。
股四头肌自主激活降低通常与膝关节损伤有关。最近,研究集中在开发特定的去抑制干预措施以改善股四头肌自主激活;然而,哪种干预措施在促进这种改善方面最有效仍不清楚。
我们检索了科学网,时间跨度为1965年1月1日至2012年9月27日,使用的关键词为股四头肌激活、经皮电神经刺激、经颅磁刺激、冷冻疗法、局部关节冷却、关节松动术、关节松动、关节手法治疗、手法治疗和神经肌肉电刺激。
我们的综述采用了评估去抑制干预措施对股四头肌自主激活效果的研究。根据每项研究在基线和所有可用的干预后时间点测量的股四头肌自主激活均值和标准差计算标准化效应量(Cohen d)和95%置信区间(CI)。
根据干预类型,将10项研究分为5类:手法治疗(4项研究)、经皮电神经刺激(2项研究)、冷冻疗法(2项研究)、神经肌肉电刺激(2项研究)和经颅磁刺激(1项研究)。经皮电神经刺激显示出最强的即时效应(d = 1.03;95% CI = 0.06,1.92)和长期效应(d = 1.93;95% CI = 0.91,2.83)。冷冻疗法(d = 0.76;95% CI = -0.13,1.59)和经颅磁刺激(d = 0.54;95% CI = -0.33,1.37)在改善股四头肌自主激活方面有中等即时效应,而手法治疗(d = 0.38;95% CI = -0.35,1.09)仅产生微弱的即时效应。在3周至6个月的时间内,神经肌肉电刺激产生了从微弱负效应到强烈正效应(d值范围 = -0.50至1.87)。
经皮电神经刺激在增加股四头肌自主激活方面显示出最强且最一致的效果,可能是改善股四头肌自主激活的最佳去抑制干预措施。