• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

缓和医疗患者和医疗保健提供者之间的幽默的可接受性。

The acceptability of humor between palliative care patients and health care providers.

机构信息

1 Department of Family and Community Medicine, Division of Palliative Care, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario, Canada .

出版信息

J Palliat Med. 2014 Apr;17(4):472-4. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0354. Epub 2014 Feb 3.

DOI:10.1089/jpm.2013.0354
PMID:24490909
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Humor frequently occurs in palliative care environments; however, the acceptability of humor, particularly between patients and health care providers has not been previously examined.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the importance and acceptability of humor to participants who are patients in a palliative care context, the study determines if demographics are correlated with the degree of acceptability, and examines the acceptance of humor by patients with advanced illness when interacting with nurses or physicians.

METHODS

One hundred participants admitted to a palliative care unit or residential hospice were surveyed. Basic demographic data were collected, as well as responses on a five-point Likert scale to a variety of questions regarding the participants' attitudes about humor before and after their illness and the acceptability of humor in a palliative setting. Participants were also given the opportunity to comment freely on the topic of humor and the palliative experience.

RESULTS

A large majority of participants valued humor highly both prior to (77%) and during (76%) their illness experience. Despite this valuation, the frequency of laughter in their daily lives diminished significantly as patients' illness progressed. Most participants remembered laughing with a nurse (87%) and a doctor (67%) in the week prior to the survey, and found humor with their doctors (75%) and nurses appropriate (88%).

CONCLUSION

The vast majority of participants found humorous interactions with their health care providers acceptable and appropriate, and this may indicate a opportunity for enhanced and more effective end-of-life care in the future.

摘要

背景

幽默经常出现在姑息治疗环境中;然而,幽默的可接受性,特别是在患者和医疗保健提供者之间,尚未得到之前的检验。

目的

探讨幽默在姑息治疗环境中对患者的重要性和可接受性,本研究确定人口统计学是否与可接受性程度相关,并检查患有晚期疾病的患者在与护士或医生互动时对幽默的接受程度。

方法

对 100 名入住姑息治疗病房或住院临终关怀病房的患者进行了调查。收集了基本的人口统计学数据,以及对参与者在患病前后对幽默的态度的五点李克特量表的回答,以及在姑息治疗环境中幽默的可接受性。参与者还有机会就幽默和姑息治疗体验的话题自由发表意见。

结果

大多数参与者在患病前(77%)和患病期间(76%)都非常重视幽默。尽管有这种价值观,但随着患者病情的发展,他们日常生活中的笑声频率显著下降。大多数参与者在调查前一周记得与护士(87%)和医生(67%)一起大笑,并且认为与医生(75%)和护士(88%)的幽默是合适的。

结论

绝大多数参与者发现与他们的医疗保健提供者进行幽默互动是可接受和适当的,这可能表明未来有机会加强和更有效地进行临终关怀。

相似文献

1
The acceptability of humor between palliative care patients and health care providers.缓和医疗患者和医疗保健提供者之间的幽默的可接受性。
J Palliat Med. 2014 Apr;17(4):472-4. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0354. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
2
Is There a Place for Humor in Hospice Palliative Care? Volunteers Say "Yes"!临终关怀与姑息治疗中幽默有一席之地吗?志愿者回答:“有!”
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017 Jun;34(5):417-422. doi: 10.1177/1049909116632214. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
3
Challenges faced by palliative care physicians when caring for doctors with advanced cancer.姑息治疗医生在照料患有晚期癌症的医生时所面临的挑战。
Palliat Med. 2008 Jan;22(1):71-6. doi: 10.1177/0269216307084607.
4
Humor and laughter in palliative care.姑息治疗中的幽默与欢笑。
J Palliat Care. 1997 Spring;13(1):34-9.
5
Humor in hospice care: who, where, and how much?临终关怀中的幽默:何人、何处以及程度如何?
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2005 Jul-Aug;22(4):287-90. doi: 10.1177/104990910502200410.
6
The Use of Humor in Palliative Care: A Systematic Literature Review.姑息治疗中幽默的运用:一项系统文献综述
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 Oct;35(10):1342-1354. doi: 10.1177/1049909118764414. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
7
Anger in palliative care: a clinical approach.姑息治疗中的愤怒:一种临床方法。
Intern Med J. 2007 Jan;37(1):49-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2006.01236.x.
8
Supportive versus palliative care: what's in a name?: a survey of medical oncologists and midlevel providers at a comprehensive cancer center.支持治疗与姑息治疗:名称有何含义?:对一家综合癌症中心的医学肿瘤学家和中级医疗服务提供者的调查
Cancer. 2009 May 1;115(9):2013-21. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24206.
9
'Death is difficult in any language': A qualitative study of palliative care professionals' experiences when providing end-of-life care to patients from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds.“死亡在任何语言中都是难以言说的”:一项针对姑息治疗专业人员在为文化和语言背景多样化的患者提供临终关怀时的经验的定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2018 Sep;32(8):1419-1427. doi: 10.1177/0269216318776850. Epub 2018 May 16.
10
Exploring Health Care Providers' Views About Initiating End-of-Life Care Communication.探索医疗服务提供者对启动临终关怀沟通的看法。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017 May;34(4):308-317. doi: 10.1177/1049909115627773. Epub 2016 Feb 14.

引用本文的文献

1
"I Need Presence and a Listening Ear": Perspectives of Spirituality and Spiritual Care Among Healthcare Providers in a Hospice Setting in Pakistan.“我需要存在和倾听的耳朵”:巴基斯坦临终关怀环境中医疗保健提供者的灵性和精神关怀观点。
J Relig Health. 2021 Aug;60(4):2862-2877. doi: 10.1007/s10943-021-01292-9. Epub 2021 May 24.
2
Visiting Nurses' Perspectives on Practices to Achieve End-of-Life Cancer Patients' Wishes for Death at Home: A Qualitative Study.访视护士对实现临终癌症患者在家中离世愿望的实践的看法:一项定性研究
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2019 Oct-Dec;6(4):389-396. doi: 10.4103/apjon.apjon_18_19.
3
Humor Assessment and Interventions in Palliative Care: A Systematic Review.
姑息治疗中的幽默评估与干预:一项系统综述。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jun 19;9:890. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00890. eCollection 2018.
4
Positive emotion communication: Fostering well-being at end of life.积极情绪沟通:促进临终关怀的幸福感。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Apr;101(4):631-638. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.11.018. Epub 2017 Nov 28.